OC’s Anti-Sanctuary State Revolt is On the Wrong Side of History

On the march (Courtesy OCIYU)

By Erik Garcia

Many cities in Orange County faced a decision to make last week regarding California being a “Sanctuary State.” Fullerton chose to take no action in Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ federal lawsuit against our state’s laws, including SB 54, that offer a measure of protection from deportation to undocumented immigrants. But the city proved to be the exception. San Juan Capistrano, Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, and Aliso Viejo all jumped aboard the Trump Train to the wrong side of history in moving to file court documents in support of the Sessions suit, passing resolutions, or in Surf City’s case, suing the state all on its own. 

Another OC city took an entirely different course of action last week. SanTana, which is the only declared “Sanctuary City” in the county, decided not to rest on its laurels. While Trump sympathizers gathered at other meetings defending hate, SanTana city council voted to file a friend of the court brief in the lawsuit against California. In a stark contrast to other cities, SanTana sided with the public safety of its residents, especially the undocumented community that stands to benefit from California continuing to be a Sanctuary State. 

Under the guise of “public safety,” cities across the county and state are actually opposing legislation that was put in place to create “safe zones” from immigration enforcement. SB 54 makes sanctuaries of schools and hospitals. It also supports public safety because it helps protect due process for everyone, including undocumented immigrants, who–contrary to what some Trump supporters may think– are extended that right in this country. 

Let’s be very clear. Opposition to California being a Sanctuary State is not about public safety, nor has it ever been. This is about pushing a political agenda that endorses hate.

Fountain Valley’s city council voted to formally oppose SB 54 after congressman Dana Rohrabacher offered to help raise money to front the legal fees. At that same meeting, the Los Angeles Times quoted a SanTana resident speaking out against SB 54 by saying, “I’m a little tired of being called a racist because I believe in the law.” It’s telling that Trump supporters will grasp at the “law” as a shield against accusations of racism and xenophobia. As more OC cities step up to the Sanctuary State question this week and council chambers echo with anti-immigrant hysteria again, the truth is laid bare. 

Besides, as the history of the United States shows, the law and what’s right have been on opposite sides of the spectrum before. SB 54 aligns the two for a change. Those opposed to California being a “Sanctuary State” want to return the Golden State back to the days of Prop. 187, but we’re too busy moving forward to live in the past. 

3 Replies to “OC’s Anti-Sanctuary State Revolt is On the Wrong Side of History”

  1. Wow, fantastic weblog format! How lengthy have you been blogging for?

    you make running a blog glance easy. The entire look
    of your site is wonderful, let alone the
    content material! You can see similar here e-commerce

  2. Spot on with this write-up, I honestly feel this website needs much more attention. I’ll probably be
    back again to read more, thanks for the advice!
    I saw similar here: Najlepszy sklep

  3. Someone necessarily assist to make significantly posts I would state. That is the very first time I frequented your website page and to this point? I surprised with the research you made to create this actual publish incredible. Excellent process!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *