The Orange County District Attorney’s office declined to press charges against Costa Mesa policeman Dana Potts in a non-fatal shooting last year. The agency published an investigation letter about the incident yesterday afternoon. Bradley Montgomery, a 49-year-old, survived a gunshot wound to the abdomen.
According to the OCDA report, Costa Mesa police responded to a call on the morning of Aug. 15, 2018 regarding a man attempting to break into the patio of an apartment residence. Potts and fellow officer Isidro Gallardo began looking for the suspect, guns still in holsters. Suddenly, Gallardo heard a single gunshot fire off. Potts walked towards the front door of a residence that Montgomery tried to break into and found him laying on the floor nursing his wound
Both Potts and Montgomery refused to speak with investigators about the shooting.
The OCDA looked at other available evidence, including Potts’ digital audio recorder. “Oh shoot!” he said moments after shooting. “What did you have in your hands?” Officer Ryan Novikoff arrived on scene before the shooting and recalled that Potts told him that it looked like Montgomery had something in his hands. Potts asked the suspect if he had a metal stick, but he denied having anything. Police later retrieved two metal objects from the scene.
If Potts sounds familiar, it’s because former district attorney Tony Rackauckas cleared him of another non-fatal shooting in 2012. In that incident, the cop located a stolen truck driven by Vincent Leon at the New Harbor Inn motel. Leon struck Potts’ patrol car twice. Potts fired six times at the truck the second time, but didn’t hit Leon.
The officer gave a voluntary statement to investigators; not so in the Montgomery shooting. Either way, district attorney Todd Spitzer’s crew cited a “lack of sufficient evidence” to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Potts acted criminally.
“It appears that Officer Potts acted justifiably when he shot Montgomery,” the report concludes. “It was dark, Montgomery was dressed in all black, was observed climbing over a wall into an enclosed, locked patio which had an open sliding glass door of a residence. This could have reasonably created a belief in Officer Potts’ mind that the use of lethal force was necessary to stop the threat that Montgomery was posing.”
The OCDA charged Montgomery with misdemeanor prowling, a crime that he pleaded guilty to on Feb. 19, 2019 and received a 30-day sentence for.
As always, read the report in its entirety online.
Gabriel San Román is from Anacrime. He’s a journalist, subversive historian and the tallest Mexican in OC. He also once stood falsely accused of writing articles on Turkish politics in exchange for free food from DönerG’s!
10 Replies to “OCDA: Costa Mesa Cop’s Shooting of Prowler ‘Appears’ Justifiable”
Prowlers should be hanged in public.
Hey, “Tyler D.”
Now that you’ve declared we should take a big steaming dump on the right to due process, how about you go goose-step off a cliff?
So did the guy who was shot have a criminal record? All I read in this dribble piece was a biased view against the officer or DA office…and I’m sure you’re well aware that not giving a statement is the correct thing to do until you discuss the matter with an attorney. (Unless you think cops shouldn’t have as equal rights like crooks do…)
As always, read the report in its entirety.
And stay classy!
Hi Allen, just in case you are seeking treatment after Gabriel’s reply: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_burn_centers_in_the_United_States
Hey Allen! I didn’t read any bias at all against the Police of the DA. Just a statement of facts.
Leaving out key facts from the DA report for this “article” is biased no matter how you read it…
Allen sez: Did he have a criminal record?
Story sez “Prowler” in the headline!
Besta check out those burn centers, son!
Being accused of being a prowler has nothing to do with a persons criminal history…criminal history is what the guy has been “convicted” of… Its all good, guess you’re not willing to take criticism. I’ll check on the burn center but commenting on your own articles under a assumed names is just sad.
Guess you read the report…you know, that part where he was convicted of misdemeanor prowling, something I mentioned in my article after providing a link to the full report. Seeing that’s the crime committed at the time of the police shooting, it’s most relevant.
Also, I don’t comment under assumed names. That’s your assumption.
Another swing and a whiff!