Lawyer for Jailed Brotherhood Figure Demands Dismissal of Case

Wow, that was fast.

Yesterday I blogged that a judge denied a request by Gerardo Gutierrez, the lawyer for Brenice Lee Smith, the onetime member of the Brotherhood of Eternal Love who has spent the past three decades living in a Nepalese monastery, to reduce his client's bail from $1.1 million to $50,000. Smith has now been behind bars for a month, apparently awaiting trial on 40-year-old charges that he conspired to smuggle a bunch of hashish from Afghanistan. In the post I mentioned that Gutierrez hadn't filed a motion to have the charges dismissed but that he planned to do so no later than Dec. 7. I also outlined some common-sense reasons why Smith should be set free immediately.

Today, Gutierrez emailed me a copy of that very motion, which essentially argues that the 1972 conspiracy indictment against Smith and more than two dozen other Brotherhood defendants failed to convincingly charge anybody with any specific crimes, instead simply stating that all of the defendants had conspired to form a church, live in Laguna Beach, deal acid and smuggle hash. (And yes, one of the charges in that indictment really was living in Laguna Beach, and yes, every single person charged in that indictment either pled guilty to lesser charges or had the charges dismissed with prejudice, meaning they can never be refiled).

]
“Brenice Smith respectfully submits that both of his indictments and all
charges thereof should be dismissed with prejudice,” the motion states.
“In the indictment…there is not any allegation or specifics provided
concerning the allged  'importation, transportation, ale of marijuana
(in all its forms) poessession of  marijuana for sale, furnish(ing)
marijuana to [a] minor, possession of marijuana, sale, transportation,
furnishing, manufacturing, administering drugs without prescription,
unlawful possession of drugs for sale, possession of drugs without
prescription, using a minor as agent or inducing violation by
furnishing to a minor, maintaining places for the unlawful disposal of
narcotics, possession for purposes of sale of narcotics other than
marijuana, transportation, importation, sale, etc., of narcotics other
than marijuana, and to commit acts injurious to the public health, to
public morals, and to pervert and obstruct justice and due
administration of laws.”

Whew. Back to Guitierrez' motion.

“Simply
stating that someone is involved in in a conspiracy, without more, is
exactly the evil that needs to be avoided by at least requiring an
assembling of defendants to form a conspiratorial agreement.”

In fact, the
closest the original Brotherhood indictment now being used to jail
Smith actually comes to alleging a specific 'conspiratorial agreement' is when it
cites the group's October 1966 articles of incorporation, which were
filed in Sacramento about two weeks after the California Legislature
banned LSD, becoming the first state to prohibit the drug, and
unwittingly turning the Brotherhood of Eternal Love from a (relatively)
law abiding group of acid heads into the biggest group of outlaws in
the Golden State.

By the way, this is what the Brotherhood of
Eternal Love set out to do in those articles of incorporation cited in
the indictment in question: “[to] bring the world a greater awareness
of God through the teachings of Jesus Christ, Buddha, Ramakrishna,
Babaji, Parahamansa Yogananda , Mahatma Gandhi, and all true prophets
and apostles of God, and to spread the love and wisdom of these great
teachers to all men irrespective of race, color or circumstances.”

Thank god the cops put a stop to that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *