Four Reasons Why Patrón Tequila is an Affront to Mexicans–And One Reason Why It's Not

Something called National Tequila Day happened this past weekend, and one PR hack or another asked us to write about it promoting some brand or other. No go. However, it does give me an opportunity to bash the Lola Gaspar of the tequila world: Patrón, elixir for fools, favored by those who still think tacos come best in a combo plate. Patrón is an affront to everything good and wonderful about the drink, at least to us Mexis. Let me count the ways:

1. The taste:
Don't buy the company's hype about ultra-premium this or double-distilled that: the flavor of Patrón, from its “silver” to its “Gran” is consistently that of mineral water spiked with a drop of agave nectar. I've tried enjoying it various times and can say with authority it bests only Sauza and Jose Cuervo on the tequila goodness scale–and the latter two are legalized rotgut.


2. Patrón is just another example of wily gabachos making fortunes off of Mexican culture:
You have to admire the business acumen of Patrón founder John Paul
DeJoria (also a co-founder of Paul Mitchell The School). He built a cult around a brand of a product that has
existed in American restaurants for over a century, and something
Mexicans have drank since Mexico's foundation, and made it seem new to
gabacho consumers. Why couldn't a Mexican do this? Why did it take
gabachos to make tequila hip? DeJoria now joins Glen Bell, James
Pace, the founders of Chipotle, and William Gebhardt as Americans who
made millions selling their countrymen safe imitations of the real pinche Mexican deal. Mexicans, as usual, slept under a cactus on this business opportunity.

3. Patrón spawned a wave of imitators that complicated a classification system that worked just fine before:
Before Patrón began its ultra-premium lies, tequila fell under three
classes–blanco, reposado, and añejo, referring to how aged each category
was. It was another category, oro, that inspired too many bad tequila
memories for coeds during the 1970s and 1980s.

Then came Patrón, boasting their bottling process created an
“ultra-premium” blend. Um, that was reposado, nectar of the gods. But
because American companies, by default, are more trustworthy in the eyes of
gabacho consumers than
Mexican companies who have been at it for centuries, rivals who should know better began unveiling new
lines, leading the Mexican government to create an extra añejo category
in 2006. By the way, the difference between extra añejo and añejo is

4. Patrón is proof that Americans will never truly trust Mexicans on matters of taste on Mexican food: Somewhat related to #2, and definitely related to the luxe-lonchera
craze of today. Simply put: American consumers didn't embrace tequila
until other gabachos said it was okay to drink, just like jokes about Montezuma's Revenge reigned about Mexican food until Taco Bell spread across the land and Diana Kennedy began selling her cookbooks This trend really
started with Sammy Hagar's Cabo Wabo brand, but Patrón's aura of
“coolness” sparked the latest tequila fad. This point, however, is more
an indictment of the American mind than against Patrón. Which leads us

One reason why Patrón is okay: DeJoria, by all accounts, is a mensch. “Success unshared is total failure,” he told Forbes, and the man does give to charity while keeps his politics to a nil. At least DeJoria hasn't turned into another fast-food conservative blowhard ala Karcher, Kroc, and too many others…yet.

One Reply to “Four Reasons Why Patrón Tequila is an Affront to Mexicans–And One Reason Why It's Not”

  1. Patron isn’t consistent in the color of tequila. I have seen the silver look more of a yellow tint. The flavor leaves a lot to desire. I would be more likely buy Milagro tequila as it is smoother than any of the Patron products. Asombroso is also one of my favorite tequilas. The Rosé being my favorite with it’s peppery notes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *