I'm from Estonia, where the punk movement was extremely strong cause of the f-ing russians in the 80s. And I have to say that this just seems like pretentious bunch. They're guys who seem to be ''living the life''. But I'm used to seeing punk as a far more serious movement, and part of the movement WAS being a rebel, you went against authorities. Or punk bands for example, worked under the disguise of something else (Because punk was banned by russians.). And to make music videos/records, the bands needed to travel to Finland because the russians owned the music studios in Estonia. But it wasn't being a rebel to BE a rebel. The tongue thing that they did was just a pretentious shit. And I don't think I'll ever approve of the
For example, punk in estonia was more about the message than being rock. Look for ''Vennaskond Insener Garini Hüperbolid lyrics'' on youtube (The song was made after we managed to free ourselves from the russians, but it still holds a shit ton of symbolism.). That song had a fucking meaning and the music was just to give it out. Punk rock movement isn't the same as punk, hence I think the ''punk'' in the name is unfitting and disgraceful to what was the meaning of it before.
I'm not huge punk fan like I was before,
because the times have moved on, and I have a life that i need to be
giving my 100% in. But I still feel somewhat involved and this.. F this.