Late Friday afternoon, Judge David O. Carter passed down his judgment on Orly Taitz's Barnett v. Obama lawsuit: denied. Again!
Taitz had filed a motion for reconsideration of Carter's earlier dismissal. The motion--and a follow-up filing--accused Carter of hiring a clerk with ties to Obama, rehashed most of the debunked eligibility arguments, implied that Carter was implicit in the Fort Hood shootings, and presented a new piece of "evidence": a printout, supposedly from some immigration database, showing Obama's "ethnic region" as Equatorial Guinea.
Carter's response was uncharacteristically curt. After all, this is the judge that allowed Taitz and her co-counsel to ramble for hours in court and that dismissed her case with a 30 page ruling. Here's the basic reason Taitz likely won't be showing up at Ronald Reagan Federal Buliding and Courthouse in Santa Ana for this lawsuit ever again:
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
After reviewing the moving and opposing papers, the Court finds no factual, legal, or bias grounds upon which to grant the motion for reconsideration.