This is all well and good for the crowd at Johnny's when that drunken pinup girl wanting to entice the boys in the room with a little girl-on-waterfowl action wraps her stems around Donald's face. But when you put the intended user on the ride--a 5-year-old child--you're running the risk of winding up on the Megan's Law registry.
File this under Disney
's boners. Like previous "uh-ohs" by the House of Mouse during its illustrious history, Disney has probably done its best to erase this latest evidence of its crime against common decency. Only a few pictures of this ride can be found online. Most feature a young girl with a perplexed look on her face
, as if she knows uncle Donald is acting weird.
Multiple requests for comment from Disney were lost in the company's vast PR machine, but thankfully, we have tavern keeper Johnny Kresimir, who didn't try to duck the obvious questions.
"The way the story was told to me was that Disney licensed [Donald's image] to someone and let it be made," said Kresimir. "Then they realized what it looked like, and that it wasn't proper."
The result? This Dirty Donald isn't available on just any street corner. Still, Kresimir wanted one for the saloon that would substitute for a photo booth (take that, Alex's Bar). He initially contacted a company in China that offered to manufacture one, but he bided his time and waited five years for the real deal.
"One of my employees knew I wanted it, and her boyfriend at the time found one somewhere in LA," Kresimir said. "I thought this was a cooler photo opportunity, if you will. Sure enough, everybody loved it."
Though he declined to divulge the item's price tag, Kresimir says Dirty Donald came with a hefty bill.
Is there any surprise something so perverse would come from the mind of a German? This Donald Duck thing is weird, too.
But Dirty Donald isn't the first PR brushfire Disney has had to piss on, as the company has a long history of sexually suggestive slipups. An Arkansas woman sued the company in 1995 over what she believed were shimmering golden penises in the background of the Little Mermaid VHS box. Though the woman quickly dropped the suit, Disney altered the image in subsequent releases.
VHS cover art for 1989's Little Mermaid, the real deal, or a total pipe dream?
YouTube also features a neat little video of a wedding scene from the Little Mermaid wherein the officiating priest steals focus when a bulge in his pants mysteriously appears. Disney flacks said this was actually the priest's knee moving, though the scene was subsequently altered.
So are these images simply fevered delusions springing from the overactive imaginations of litigious viewers? Or are they an artistic rebellion by Disney animators splashing onto the silver screen despite their master's iron-fisted attempts to present a sterilized fantasy universe? We may never know. It could be awhile before Disney publicly acknowledges a world in which the prince actually bends Snow White (or another prince, for that matter) over a log while the dwarves watch intently from the trees.
We know our readers can envision such a world. Please feel free to comment on your favorite Disney boo-boos. And keep them coming.