Wish you would look into Eric Naposki case! We convicted this man on a conspiracy theory with absolutely NO hard evidence placing him at the house, in the house, pulling the trigger. We've released more murderers on lesser evidence. I'm disgusted with the system. We have convicted people for murder in the past with "eye witnesses " statements only and NO REAL Hard evidence, other then a missing gun, which was also available to the ex with a lust for rich men, manipulation and greed. Yet we convicted her boyfriend for entering the house? Pulling the trigger? 17 years later? Where is the reasonable doubt? I've written down license plates numbers in the past for my own personal reason. So would I be convicted of murder? Could he have written down the plate number to perhaps plan to investigate his ex's story that he was starting to not believe? Question is ..it possible? YES...reasonable doubt, but we want to say YES he MUST have done it. Disgusting. Where is the shoe prints, DNA??? in the victims house? anything?? NO, 17 years later we take away a father from a family whose only guilt was to get himself with a woman she devil. All I hear is "Could Have, Should Have, Would Have..." where's the Evidence???