@sesmithwrites Education push that most adults are not current on pertussis and are the main carriers =yes please
By Charles Lam
By R. Scott Moxley
By Taylor Hamby
By Matt Coker
By R. Scott Moxley
By Charles Lam
By LP Hastings
By Taylor Hamby
Steve and Vicky Carrico watch their 5-month-old twin daughters, Ashley and Dalen, as they wiggle on their tummies in the living room of their Capistrano Beach home. Dressed in matching "I [heart] Mom" onesies, the wide-eyed girls coo softly while lifting their heads to gaze at their surroundings.
"I can't describe it," says Steve, a realtor. "I never knew there was such a hole in my life until they got here. I would do anything in the world for them."
Like all new parents, they want nothing more than to protect their children. And for the Carricos, this mandate includes fiercely guarding what gets injected into their bodies. When the babies were born, doctors said they would need the Hepatitis B vaccine, given to all newborns in the United States, before being discharged from the hospital. The Carricos refused.
"They don't need to be vaccinated for a sexually transmitted disease," Steve says with a tone of disdain. "Come on, they're babies! They're barely out of the womb, and it's like, 'Let's dope them up and stick them with needles!'"
Vicky, a stay-at-home mom, adds softly, "They're so little. Their immune systems aren't strong."
Since then, the couple has decided to skip or delay various vaccines recommended by government health agencies, believing the injections could have harmful side effects. "The human body was put together pretty darn good," says Steve, who has always believed in medication as a last resort. "God did a great job in giving us all the tools we need to heal ourselves."
* * *
The Carricos are part of a growing group of moms and dads that questions the vaccine schedule set forth by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), a standard pediatricians have long seen as sacrosanct. It's a group with which doctors don't know what to do. In the parenting sphere, few issues are as polarizing as childhood vaccinations. Those who forgo some or all of the recommended children's shots do so for a spectrum of reasons, from concerns about toxicity to fears about autism to religious beliefs to a faith in "natural immunity" to a general distrust of the government agencies that approve vaccines and the manufacturers that profit from them.
Those who do vaccinate their children, along with a majority of medical experts and public-health officials, contend that most fears about vaccine safety are based on unproven science and that skipping vaccinations is fundamentally irresponsible—low vaccination rates can threaten the immunity of entire communities. In his book The Panic Virus, which delves into the vaccine wars in the U.S. and England, author Seth Mnookin writes, "If only there were a shot for irrational fears."
For years, the issue seemed to be black and white—moms and dads either gave kids all their shots or were ostracized by doctors and their communities. But now concerned parents are discovering what they see as refreshing middle ground. They're turning to Dr. Robert Sears, a Capistrano Beach pediatrician and author of The Vaccine Book, described as an "authoritative, impartial, fact-based guide to childhood vaccinations." In his turquoise, 335-page manual, which has sold more than 180,000 copies in the five years since it debuted, Sears pinpoints the vaccines he deems most crucial and presents his own alternatives to the CDC-recommended schedules. He backs up his claims with countless findings from medical papers, translating medical information into layman-friendly language. "This infection can be a real pain in the . . . diaper area," he explains of the rotavirus disease. Across the world, parents walk into their doctor's offices armed with his book, highlighted and dog-eared.
"It's a lot of common sense," says Steve, whose daughters are patients of Sears. "I'll take my chances with diseases that haven't been seen in America in 50 years. Sometimes, you gotta put your faith in somebody."
But whether Sears is the man to follow has been a focus of intense debate. A quick Google search on the Orange County doctor results in headlines such as "Cashing In On Fear: The Danger of Dr. Sears" and "Bob Sears: Bald-faced liar, devious dissembler, or both?" The book has been called "the bane of pediatricians everywhere" and Sears himself a "prophet of doom." Steven Novella, a writer for the medical website Science-Based Medicine, compares Sears' alternative stance to "trying to compromise between mutually exclusive positions, like young-earth creationism and evolution," adding, "it doesn't work." Sears' opponents criticize his downplaying of vaccine-preventable diseases, with some even blaming him indirectly for the 2008 measles outbreak in San Diego, which infected 11 people. The child who had brought back the disease from a trip to Europe was once Sears' patient.
Where does Sears stand on vaccines? He makes his proclamation in the opening line of The Vaccine Book: "I am a pro-vaccine doctor." He then follows this statement with "I am also a pro-information doctor, and today's parents are asking many more questions about vaccines than parents in decades past."
His open approach is what brings flocks of parents to his offices at Sears Family Pediatrics, a red-tile-roofed, Spanish-style building he shares with his dad, Dr. William Sears, author of the ubiquitous parenting guide The Baby Book and the father of attachment parenting. (The elder Sears catapulted to mainstream prominence earlier this year when he was profiled in a Time magazine piece that featured a woman breastfeeding an almost 4-year-old on the cover.) Taped onto the front desk is a newspaper article with a declarative headline: "Nursing a 3-year-old is normal, child experts say." Brochures stacked on wooden shelves offer statistics on autism and lists of resources. (One in 88 children—and 1 in 54 boys—is diagnosed with the disorder, according to the CDC.)
Sears, who goes by "Dr. Bob" to avoid confusion, sits in an exam room after sending home a little patient with a high-five and a sticker of her choice. The bespectacled 43-year-old wears a polo shirt, khakis and a stethoscope around his neck and looks as though he could be your high-school science teacher.
"Anyone who thinks I'm a radical hasn't read my book or hasn't met me," he says with a gentle smile. "I'm just a regular, small-town doctor."
The families that come to him, he says, are often fed up with the condescension they've experienced at other doctors' offices. Some have a baby who once had a bad reaction to a vaccine, yet the doctor wouldn't alter the vaccine schedule. Others have been barred from practices that won't accept patients who aren't immunized. Roughly 25 percent of his patients do not vaccinate, and another 25 percent partially vaccinate. Sears takes them all. "Vaccines are probably the only area of medicine that we're not allowed to question," Sears says. "Doctors are very happy to answer questions all day, but as soon as someone asks about vaccines, some sort of alarm goes off and it's suddenly, 'Oh, no, you're one of those parents.' I don't know why that is."
So Sears sees his role as a bridge between the medical community and those skeptical of it, declaring that vaccinations don't have to be an all-or-nothing decision. "More and more parents are wanting to do vaccines differently, and if we keep kicking them out of our offices, we're going to have fewer vaccinated kids," he says. "I see using alternative vaccination approaches as a way of keeping vaccination rates higher and preserving our nation's immunity."
And it may just be effective. He's finding that some parents who once rejected vaccines altogether are easing into them with his modifications tailored for their individual needs.
"A doctor is finally listening to them," he says.
* * *
Vaccines protect us in two ways. On an individual level, they expose the body to a weakened, usually harmless form of a disease, allowing the immune system to strengthen its defenses in order to fight that disease if it encounters it again. On a societal scale, when a certain threshold of a population is vaccinated, it creates what's known as "herd immunity." Diseases need hosts in order to survive, so if the vast majority of people in a given area is protected, a disease has nowhere to go and disappears. For decades, vaccines all but wiped out many diseases in the U.S. that once killed millions, including smallpox, polio, measles, diphtheria and bacterial meningitis. The only children who went unimmunized were those who had medical issues or whose parents couldn't afford the shots, a problem now remedied through federal funds.
In 1998, the public's confidence was shaken when British medical journal The Lancet published a study linking the common MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine to the onset of autism. The author, Andrew Wakefield, had found traces of the measles virus, presumably from the shot, in a dozen autistic children, eight of whom developed regressive symptoms soon after receiving the vaccination. But the paper was later discredited by scientists. In 2010, after an in-depth investigation concluded that Wakefield was guilty of dishonesty and misconduct, the journal retracted the study, with editors noting, "It was utterly clear, without any ambiguity at all, that the statements in the paper were utterly false."
Meanwhile, when her son Evan was diagnosed with autism, actress and former Playboy pinup Jenny McCarthy became one of the world's most prominent advocates for autism, writing several best-selling books in which she claimed the MMR vaccine had probably contributed to her child's disorder. Medical professionals blasted McCarthy for spreading what they saw as dangerous misinformation. Parents with autistic children, many who were diagnosed not long after they were vaccinated, hailed the actress as the "voice" of the medical mystery. The fiery debate intensified when the self-proclaimed "mother warrior" went on Oprah in 2007 and proudly told the audience, "The University of Google is where I got my degree."
Years before the wave of panic had been set off, Sears, a graduate of San Clemente High School and Biola University, began his own road of questioning as a first-year medical student at Georgetown University. He and his wife, Cheryl, had a new baby, and the young family was living with a friend during the transition to the new city. The friend happened to be an early vaccine-rejector and had Sears read Harris Coulter and Barbara Loe Fisher's 1985 book, A Shot In the Dark. It had sparked the first modern popular concern about the risk of neurological damage from vaccines, in this case the DTP vaccine, which doctors no longer use.
"When the book came out, a lot of people didn't believe it," Sears says. "I didn't believe it either. I'd always been taught that vaccines don't cause any bad side effects and that there were no worries whatsoever."
But the book cited numerous scientific articles, and Sears was intrigued. So outside of class, he'd spend his days in the medical library reading every paper he could find on childhood vaccines. A soon-to-be pediatrician, the information was relevant to his career, but he also wanted to know if he had done the right thing by giving his infant son, Andrew, all the standard shots. "I didn't want to just listen to all the mainstream messages that were being taught to me without reading the research myself," he says. "I wanted to investigate."
After graduating and moving back to Orange County, Sears' interest in vaccines escalated. He started dissecting every ingredient in every vaccine pamphlet, highlighting each one and studying its side effects. Ethyl mercury in the preservative thimerosal, which some parents associated with autism, had already been removed from common childhood vaccines starting in 1999, but Sears discovered others that weren't exactly organic. "Some of the chemicals are very toxic and can cause cancer and reproductive problems," he says. "There are chemicals such as formaldehyde. MSG is in some vaccines. There are chemicals that are very similar to antifreeze. Some flu shots actually have a spermicide used as a preservative. But they're all in tiny amounts, and I believe they're probably safe because they're in such tiny quantities."
One chemical did stand out to him—aluminum. It's found in about half of vaccines, and Sears dedicates about 15 pages in his book to the potential dangers of it. (According to a paper published by the AAP, aluminum can cause neurological harm, but the quantity at which it's a threat has not been determined.)
In his practice, Sears would host monthly lectures about his findings. He'd ask parents why they were declining vaccines, and the most common answer was they didn't like the "overload." Back in the 1980s, doctors gave children a total of 12 vaccines throughout their childhood, with no more than three on the same visit. Now, Sears says, doctors give children 54 doses of 12 vaccines, sometimes with seven vaccines on the same day. Parents also expressed they only wanted to give their kids vaccines against diseases that posed a real threat, not long-shot illnesses. Sears listened.
"Most doctors aren't even willing to discuss vaccine options," he says. "They will say every single vaccine is absolutely important and just as important as any other vaccine. Those statements are very closed-minded. If you have disease such as meningitis that does occur in babies and kills babies, and then you have a disease such as Hepatitis B that doesn't occur in babies, how can you say the Hepatitis B vaccine is just as important? When parents hear those types of statements from doctors, they automatically tune them out. Because parents are smarter than that."
He also had an issue with the way vaccines are approved by the government. When a medical manufacturer makes a vaccine, a panel of doctors at the Food and Drug Administration must decide whether to approve it. Doctors on that panel might own stock in the vaccine manufacturers or even work for the vaccine manufacturers. "It's a huge conflict of interest," Sears says. "We're asking doctors to approve these vaccines when their whole life and professional world is being funded by the people that make that vaccine."
With all his material, Sears decided to write an easy-to-digest vaccine guide that presented information for each of the 12 standard vaccines and answered questions about every disease: Is it common? Is it serious? Is it treatable? When is the vaccine given? How is the vaccine made? What ingredients are in the final solution? Should you give this vaccine to your baby? For every vaccine, he included a section called "The Way I See It," in which he simply shared what makes the most sense to him. (Polio: get the shot. Hepatitis A: wait until the child is at least 2. And so on.) He designed two alternative vaccination schedules—one for parents who only wanted the most crucial shots for their children, and the other for parents who wanted to minimize the number of shots per visit to no more than two. Both spaced out the vaccines under the theory that tiny bodies could better process fewer shots at a time. With the alternative schedules, he says, he rarely sees the severe side effects he hears about from patients coming from other doctors' offices.
The Vaccine Book became a parent's bookshelf staple. Vanessa Showalter, a 39-year-old mom in Mission Viejo, started reading it while pregnant with her second child, Justin, now 2. She says she wanted to do things differently from the first time around after learning more about possible links to autism. "As a first-time parent, you really just go along with what the doctors tell you," says Showalter, whose first-born, Jacob, had all the standard vaccines. "Your baby is 2 days old, and the doctor wants to give him a shot, and you don't know any better, so you say yes." With Justin, Showalter went through Sears' book, making notes in the margins and picking out what she felt were "common diseases." She eventually came up with her own vaccination timetable, calling the process "empowering."
Rebecca Estepp, an activist with Talk About Curing Autism, a national organization that offers support and information to families, believes Sears' approach "makes far more sense than the CDC schedule." Her 14-year-old son, Eric, was diagnosed with autism at age 3, and she believes a Hepatitis B vaccine was the cause. "[Sears] spent a lot of time thinking about how to prevent infectious diseases while not creating chronic ones at the same time," says Estepp, who moved from Aliso Viejo to San Diego. "Vaccines should be a risk-benefit analysis." (Sears contends that there is no scientific proof that vaccines trigger autism, but he is pushing for more large-scale research to be done.)
Dr. David Nunez, family-health medical director of the Orange County Health Care Agency, emphasizes that low vaccination rates put the community at risk for outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. According to the California Department of Public Health, more than 9,000 cases of pertussis, also known as whooping cough, were reported in California in 2010. (See "Host Bodies" for more information about OC parents in a cluster of South County schools who are choosing to not vaccinate their kids.)
"Providers should not be advocating for delayed vaccines as a matter of practice," Nunez says. "The research shows us that vaccines are safe and that there's no evidence the number or the schedule of vaccines overwhelms the immune system. Many of the vaccine-preventable diseases have the potential to cause severe illness or death for infants."
Sears doesn't see a problem. At least not immediately. "Right now, enough people are vaccinating that the herd immunity of our nation is not being compromised yet," he says.
He continues to be an advocate for parents who want choices, and at the moment, that includes fighting against Assembly Bill 2109, which would require parents to obtain a doctor's signature before they can enroll ther child in public school if they wish to skip one or more vaccines. Authored by Dr. Richard Pan (D-Sacramento) and supported by the California Medical Association, the bill was passed by the state House in a majority vote and is currently being discussed by the Senate Health Committee. "We're giving doctors too much power," Sears says. In the next five or 10 years, what else are parents going to need their doctor's permission for? This sets a dangerous precedent." As of press time, the bill is in the Senate.
Sears does emphasize that from a public-health standpoint, vaccinating is "clearly in everyone's best interest." He offers a quote from Star Trek to further the point: "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few . . . or the one."
But most parents aren't Spock. Most parents simply want to be protectors.
"You can argue with these parents that the decision they're making to not vaccinate is bad for public health, but most parents are trying to make a medical decision that's best for their baby," Sears says. "I think we're all selfish when making any decision for our own children. I can't fault parents for thinking that way."
This article appeared in print as "The Needle Doctor: OC's Dr. Robert Sears, author of The Vaccine Book, finds the middle ground in America's war on vaccinations."
@sesmithwrites Education push that most adults are not current on pertussis and are the main carriers =yes please
@sesmithwrites Debate maybe, but why are autism link people who are neither doctors nor scientists interviewed for all these articles?
@sesmithwrites the question shouldn't be "Should we vaccinate?" It should be "How do we vaccinate more people?"
The human body was NOT put together so well that "in nature" any more than ONE out of FIVE children survive to breeding age.
80% mortality rate. THAT's "natural".
If vaccines are safe then why are our doctors, nurses and vaccine companies free from liability? What other procedures to they do where they have zero responsibility for the outcome, regardless of their own negligence? If a vaccine kills or harms you or your child, The maximum amount awarded is $250,000, and the money for the fund that covers it is paid for by the people purchasing vaccines via a surcharge. To get any compensation, you have to hire a lawyer to file a "claim" and good luck getting anything, this law is set up to skirt liability. It is frightening and a violation of our tort rights, not to mention an insult that this was ever described as protecting the consumer. It only protects the medical community. The last thing we need is the AMA having more control over what we do to ourselves and our children. I urge everyone to read the Vaccine Protection Act, it changed my mind for good on this topic. The last thing we need is for our state to dictate what we do to our bodies. Read the labels, these vaccines contain cell from human aborted fetuses, monkeys and chickens and they inject into your blood while taking no liability for the outcome. No thanks!
"The current schedule, as recommended by the AAP and CDC, is completely safe and thoroughly studied." Then why does VAERS exist? Sears is making how much profit from promoting choice, partnership in health care..relative to the doctors who have stock in pharm companies that are making how much profit from attempting to vaccinate every child with how many vaccines? I realize to many Americans do not want the responsibility of making their own choice let alone the having to put forth the extra effort to do the research themselves to be able to make an informed choice!
This article is completely irresponsible and misleading. There is no evidence for the safety of the delayed schedule Dr. Bob proposes. He merely preys on the vulnerability of new parents to make significant profit. The current schedule, as recommended by the AAP and CDC, is completely safe and thoroughly studied. I will continue to vaccinate my children according to THAT schedule.
I've just looked at the Cochrane Collaboration on the topic of flu vaccines. I can't find anything to support plasmarules' contention. I did find a comment that there was insufficient data to evaluate the safety of the killed virus vaccine in children under 2, but that's hardly what he's claiming. The same article is discussing how effective the vaccine is. The anti-vaccination crowd will appear any time there is an open discussion like this. It's frustrating hearing the same old tired arguments. I feel for any parent who has to make choices about their child's safety, but it's sad that the misinformation and paranoia gets such a big megaphone.
Lots of comments suggesting that anyone who doesn't want to vaccinate isn't following the science. Well the Cochrane Collaboration is the gold standard of science and they've shown that there is ZERO evidence the flu shot has any effectiveness for those under 2, yet the CDC still says vaccinate at 6 months. They've shown that the vaccine is pointless for healthy adults and doesn't affect transmission or complications but the CDC still says it's the best way not just to prevent getting the flu, but to protect others. So tell me who is really ignoring the vast bulk of science, parents or the CDC/AAP?
I get dirty looks from my daughters doctor even for denying the flu vaccine. I'm sorry, Is that one mandatory for school, NO, so stop trying to push it. The response: You know you are just playing with fire by doing that". Yes, I know, time to switch doctors. While I agree with some of the vaccines, I certainly do not agree with all of them. If I had known some of the things I do today, she would not have gotten half of the vaccines she has. But, I guess it's not too late to start delving into them and making my own choice. Besides, what child likes getting a shot? I don't remember getting nearly this many shots while I was growing up.
Great article. If I'd had a pediatrician like Dr. Sears when my first baby was born, she would still be alive today. Our then-pediatrician said to 'bring your baby down for her shots' we obeyed like lemmings and our daughter died within hours of getting the hepatitis B vaccine at age 5 weeks, a vaccine for a sexually and blood transmitted disease that is given to most newborns today. The coroner found a swollen brain, the classic medical textbook definition of a vaccine adverse reaction. We've gone on to have two more kids who are unvaccinated, healthy and neurologically normal, unlike so many over-vaccinated kids today. After studying the risk of vaccine adverse reactions vs. the risk of diseases and disease complications, I'd have to be a total idiot to vaccinate my kids. I'm not an idiot, I'm a graduate of UC Berkeley Haas Business School and I am a quantitative financial market strategist (Salomon Brothers 1986-1991). Parents, do your homework on the risk of vaccine adverse reactions before you vaccinate. It's your family and your choice, don't be intimidated by government pseudo-scientific propaganda that won't even admit what a vaccine adverse reaction is. http://therefusers.com/about/vaccine-epidemic-how-corporate-greed-biased-science-and-coercive-government-threaten-our-human-rights-our-health-and-our-children/
"Rebecca Estepp, an activist with Talk About Curing Autism, a national organization that offers support and information to families..."
TACA also promotes unproven and potentially dangerous "alternative treatments" for autism. One such "treatment" is MMS, also known as bleach, which is administered as an enema to autistic children. TACA is joined at the hip with Jenny McCarthy.
Sears is a huckster. Too bad the OC Weekly didn't see through him.
@NoLiabiltyForVacs - Doctors, nurses, and companies are not free from liability. NVICP is a no-fault compensation system. It is far easier to win in vaccine court than in civil. The court pays your legal fees, win or lose, and there is no shortage of ambulance chasers ready to take your case. Provided you have one.
And no vaccine is injected straight into the bloodstream. I know that sounds scarier, but most vaccine are injected IM or sub-Q.
You are obviously not concerned with getting your facts straight. No wonder the anti-vaccine movement is marginalized to posting comments on the internet.
@JustSayNo Have you ever actually taken a look at any of the VAERS data? A kid gets vaccinated. Two days later they die in a car accident. It gets reported to VAERS. Sears is making a heck of a lot more money than any family practice/pediatrician is making right now, I can tell you that. Vaccines are not something doctors make any money from. In fact, they LOSE money in some circumstances. It's one thing to take the time to do research on your own about what your doctor recommends for your doctor, but not all 'research' is created equal, and the anti-vax movement is a perfect example of how scientifically illiterate Americans are.
@mellis28 At least the kids are GETTING vaccinated at some phase. Better than never.
@mellis28 How can it be "thoroughly studied" when it's constantly changing to add more vaccines and more boosters? That doesn't sound like a thoroughly thought out statement to me. Have you compared the schedule from 1982 until 2012?
@daniel.weinstein1 Here's an interview with Cochrane's head of vaccines Dr. Tom Jefferson - http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/interview-with-epidemiologist-tom-jefferson-a-whole-industry-is-waiting-for-a-pandemic-a-637119-2.html
SPIEGEL: For a number of years, as part of the Cochrane Collaboration, you have been systematically evaluating all the studies on immunization against seasonal influenza. How good does it work?
Jefferson: Not particularly good. An influenza vaccine is not working for the majority of influenza-like illnesses because it is only designed to combat influenza viruses. For that reason, the vaccine changes nothing when it comes to the heightened mortality rate during the winter months. And, even in the best of cases, the vaccine only works against influenza viruses to a limited degree. Among other things, there is always the danger that the flu virus in circulation will have changed by the time that the vaccine product is finished with the result that, in the worst case, the vaccine will be totally ineffectual. In the best of cases, the few decent studies that exist show that the vaccine mainly works with healthy young adults. With children and the elderly, it only helps a little, if at all.
SPIEGEL: But aren't those the exact groups that influenza immunization is recommended for?
Jefferson: Indeed. That's one of the contradictions between scientific findings and practice, between evidence and policy.
SPIEGEL: So, what's behind this contradiction?
Jefferson: Of course, that has something to do with the influence of the pharmaceutical industry. But it also has to do with the fact that the importance of influenza is completely overestimated. It has to do with research funds, power, influence and scientific reputations!
SPIEGEL: So, at the moment is it reasonable to keep vaccinating against seasonal influenza?
Jefferson: I can't see any reason for it, but I'm not a decision maker.
@daniel.weinstein1 For adults: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20614424 In the relatively uncommon circumstance of vaccine matching the viral circulating strain and high circulation, 4% of unvaccinated people versus 1% of vaccinated people developed influenza symptoms (risk difference (RD) 3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2% to 5%). The corresponding figures for poor vaccine matching were 2% and 1% (RD 1, 95% CI 0% to 3%). These differences were not likely to be due to chance. Vaccination had a modest effect on time off work and had no effect on hospital admissions or complication rates.andAn earlier systematic review of 274 influenza vaccine studies published up to 2007 found industry funded studies were published in more prestigious journals and cited more than other studies independently from methodological quality and size. Studies funded from public sources were significantly less likely to report conclusions favorable to the vaccines. The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions and spurious notoriety of the studies.
@daniel.weinstein1 Here you go - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18425905In children under two, the efficacy of inactivated vaccine was similar to placebo.andInfluenza vaccines are efficacious in children older than two but little evidence is available for children under two. ****There was a marked difference between vaccine efficacy and effectiveness.**** No safety comparisons could be carried out, emphasizing the need for standardisation of methods and presentation of vaccine safety data in future studies. It was surprising to find only one study of inactivated vaccine in children under two years, given current recommendations to vaccinate healthy children from six months old in the USA and Canada.
@aflac6981 Which diseases are you comfortable with her contracting and passing on to others in your community? You are already okay with her contracting influenza and passing it on to children who may have chronic conditions like asthma. The Hib vaccine wasn't around when we were children. Would you be okay with your daughter contracting Hib meningitis?Your doctor may be trying to protect your daughter. Perhaps you should ask him why he wants you to get the flu shot. A nice long conversation may change your mind.
@belkin Did the autopsy specifically note the cause of death to be a vaccine reaction?
No one says that vaccinatin is 100% safe. There are always risks, that's life. An analagous situation is do you go down in your airplane that's been disabled and is on fire or do you bail out? Do you think really we would be better off with endemic small pox, a true success story of modern medicine?
@belkin - Mr. Belkin is a hard-core anti-vaccine activist who makes no apologies for his wrong-headed views. His rock band, The Refusers, perform songs with such titles as "Vaccine Gestapo" and "Vaccination Uber Alles." He is the face of the anti-vaccine movement.
Still feel like compromising?
@cattycritic Thanks for reading. I have heard that as well. I do think it's important for doctors to acknowledge concerns.
@xtctopaz - Infant mortality has been estimated at about 40% in modern hunter-gatherer societies. The citations are easily found on Google scholar and elsewhere, xtc.
@xtctopaz I don't know whether the stat quoted is supportable or not (my guess is not) but it's an irrefutable fact that nature is cruel; and were it not for modern medicine we'd be lucky to survive pregnancy, childbirth and infanthood. There's PLENTY of evidence to support that assertion.
FACTUALLY UNTRUE. Look who needs to get his facts straight. A FRACTION of vaccine injuries ever see a dime. You ARE A MORON.
@Lawrencium "no fault" is no liability. The doctors nurses and companies do NOT pay the compensation, it is paid for by every person who buys vaccines, as a surcharge. Who "wins" in vaccine court? Is the lives of your children worth more than $250,000? What if the hospital bill is more than that? What if there is gross negligence and your child is killed? Our bill or rights states that we have the right to tort, this is not the same thing. It is an insult to anyone injured by these vaccines. Your semantics regarding how the vaccine gets into the bloodstream is irrelevant, whether it be by I.V. or by a shot in the butt. It gets into your bloodstream, as does cells of human fetuses, monkeys, chickens, not to mention aluminum and mercury. Your argument is weak.
@Lawrencium ANTI-VAX don't need FACTS.
@Tamale "the anti-vax movement is a perfect example of how scientifically illiterate Americans are." And yet time and again any study on which parents are delaying or skipping vaccines show it's educated & professional parents who are opting out.
@Tamale You're talking about a few anomalies. Nice bit of misdirection.
@Tamale "Sears is making a heck of a lot more money than any family practice/pediatrician is making right now"
Indeed. Sears's alternative schedule calls for twice as many office visits in the first year as the AAP schedule.
@CEOTnLIndustries Have you even read the rest of the comments? Look at the rest and you will see documented studies that prove that the influenza vaccine actually does little to nothing for children and elderly in preventing the flu. Why shoot your kids up with artificial chemicals to have no effect except the harm from the chemicals? There's also been a study that shows unvaccinated kids have significantly LESS allergies, asthma, ADHD, autism, etc. than vaccinated kids. After shooting them up with all those chemicals at such young ages, I wonder why...... So sad. :(
@CEOTnLIndustriesI wonder why the number of people suffering from asthma has doubled since 1980? I wonder why inants to age 4 make up the sharpest increase?The vaccine for Haemophilus influenzae type b was licensed in 1985 and was recommended on the schedule published in 1989. When the schedule was published again in 1994, the hepatitis B vaccine had been added. The hepatitis B vaccine was not new, as it had been licensed in 1981; however, between its licensure and 1990, the vaccine was recommended only for high-risk sub-groups of the population, such as infants of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive mothers, healthcare workers, intravenous drug users, homosexual men, and people with multiple sexual partners. However, immunization of high-risk groups wasn’t stopping transmission of the disease. That’s because about one-third of patients with acute disease were not in identifiable risk groups. The change of recommendation to immunize all infants was the result of these failed attempts to control hepatitis B by only immunizing high-risk groups and to prevent the one-third of cases that occurred in individuals not identified as high risk.
@kbear09090 We're supposed to take Mr. Belkin's word for everything he tells us. That makes him no different than most of the "tens of thousands" of parents who tell "the same story."
No, I do not compromise when it comes to the health and well being of my children...I am also the face of the anti vaccine movement, a mother whose concern for her childrens' health and well being prompted me to do the work and research to make the INFORMED choice not to vaccinate my children as opposed to following the recommendations of those profiting from a) the vaccines themselves and b) the continuous treatment of the myriad diseases caused by compromised immune systems...
@Lawrencium Dear Lawrencium: Thanks for the kind mention of my band the Refusers, we are currently #14 in Seattle Rock (top 1% of 1900 local bands) on reverbnation (indie rock). Two steps above Heart. Music fans and the vaccine rights movement must have a different opinion about our music and message than Mr. Lawrencium. OCWeekly readers can check out our music (First Do No Harm, Get Your Mandates Out of My Body) for free here: http://www.reverbnation.com/artist/control_room/786155#!/therefusers
Watch our video here (287,000 views in 4 months) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9y4Pq7lXAw
Read our vaccine rights and science news blog here
and follow our facebook page here http://www.facebook.com/TheRefusers?sk=wall
Thanks again for your generous promotion of the Refusers, Lawrencium!
@michellewoo - Most MDs acknowledge concerns, but are frustrated by the amount of bad information out there. How about a story on vax myths?
@NoLiabilityForVacs - Wrong on both counts. Vaccine makers can still be sued in civil court - see Sykes v. Wyeth, for example. Regarding your expert opinion of how vaccines are delivered, your understanding of human anatomy and physiology is weak. Mode of delivery is an important factor for how quickly the body absorbs and reacts to substances. I don't expect you to admit you are wrong, much less to change your belief based on new evidence, but there may be others reading this who are interested in bettering themselves.
@xtctopaz How many of them, though, are actually educated in science, medicine or statistics? When you get to those numbers, I suspect it drops precipitously. A few years ago on Frontline when they covered the vaccine debate, the "very educated" person featured was a PhD in English literature. Her "research" was all done at Google U reading anti-vax sites.
@plasmarules Whether or not they are anomalies, VAERS does not prove causation. In fact, it doesn't even prove that an event happened. VAERS merely proves that someone thinks something happened and reported it. It is a passive reporting system, and not proof of anything at all other than people have access to a computer and think things happened.
Comparison of Blood and Brain Mercury Levels in Infant Monkeys Exposed to Methylmercury or Vaccines Containing Thimerosal Environmental Health Perspectives, Aug 2005. Thomas Burbacher, PhD [University of Washington]. This study demonstrates clearly and unequivocally that ethyl mercury, the kind of mercury found in vaccines, not only ends up in the brain, but leaves double the amount of inorganic mercury as methyl mercury, the kind of mercury found in fish. This work is groundbreaking because little is known about ethyl mercury, and many health authorities have asserted that the mercury found in vaccines is the "safe kind." This study also delivers a strong rebuke of the Institute of Medicine's recommendation in 2004 to no longer pursue the mercury-autism connection. Excerpt: "A recently published IOM review (IOM 2004) appears to have abandoned the earlier recommendation [of studying mercury and autism] as well as back away from the American Academy of Pediatrics goal [of removing mercury from vaccines]. This approach is difficult to understand, given our current limited knowledge of the toxicokinetics and developmental neurotoxicity of thimerosal, a compound that has been (and will continue to be) injected in millions of newborns and infants."
5. Gender-selective toxicity of thimerosal.
Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2009 Mar;61(2):133-6. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
Branch DR, Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
A recent report shows a correlation of the historical use of thimerosal in therapeutic immunizations with the subsequent development of autism; however, this association remains controversial. Autism occurs approximately four times more frequently in males compared to females; thus, studies of thimerosal toxicity should take into consideration gender-selective effects. The present study was originally undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of thimersosal in male and female CD1 mice. However, during the limited MTD studies, it became apparent that thimerosal has a differential MTD that depends on whether the mouse is male or female. At doses of 38.4-76.8mg/kg using 10% DMSO as diluent, seven of seven male mice compared to zero of seven female mice tested succumbed to thimerosal. Although the thimerosal levels used were very high, as we were originally only trying to determine MTD, it was completely unexpected to observe a difference of the MTD between male and female mice. Thus, our studies, although not directly addressing the controversy surrounding thimerosal and autism, and still preliminary due to small numbers of mice examined, provide, nevertheless, the first report of gender-selective toxicity of thimerosal and indicate that any future studies of thimerosal toxicity should take into consideration gender-specific differences.
@belkin - Although I am a life-long fan of rock music, I do realize that scientific matters are best settled with rigorous, peer-reviewed research, as opposed to power chords and forced rhyme.