-
LeeBeniteau 05/12/2010 1:27:00 PM
Bill Hunt’s got the cojones the other candidates’ lack. If it comes down to a confrontation between the sheriff and the feds, the feds will blink first. They are on thin state's rights ice here if they confront the CLEO of the county and they know it. If you want your water back somebody’s got to stand up to the feds and say enough is enough. Bill Hunt will do that.
Bill Hunt is part of a new breed of law enforcement. He stands with the people; not the deep pocketed special interests of the established business as usual Republican and Democratic candidate sponsors. The people can trust Bill Hunt to begin the long road back from the incestuous, federal and state, partisan Republican and Democratic Party political agendas which only serve the interests of the party sponsors with the big bucks and not the interests of the people.
The rule of law, as the founders intended is what Bill Hunt will bring back to the county. Listen to what he is saying, not the platitudes and dissembling of his opponents. Bill Hunt is correct about the sheriff's power to tell the feds to back off and he'll do it. His deputies will stand behind him. They trust his judgment. That's something the other candidates cannot claim. They haven’t got the cojones to stand up to the feds and they do not have the backing of the deputies.
Mr. Hunter is purposely misrepresenting the Oath Keepers in an attempt to slander Bill Hunt. The Oath Keepers are simply reminding active duty military personnel, police, sheriffs, and other first responders that the oath of service that they swore was to the Constitution of the United States, not to any man or political agenda. Oath Keepers also remind these men and women of service that it is illegal to obey an illegal order. If it is unconstitutional then it is illegal. Warrantless searches are unconstitutional as is gun confiscation, denying habeas corpus and trying civilians before military tribunals. All are absolutely unconstitutional. There are ten orders that anyone who has taken the oath does not have to obey. They are spelled out on OathKeepers.org
Many of the Oath Keepers spreading the word are Veterans of undeclared, illegal military interventions being waged right now and of other military interventions in which our young men died trusting their leaders to not waste their young lives in wrong-headed, armed political maneuverings touted as the right thing to do at the time. Many of us have been there because we trusted the wrong man under whom we served.
WE NOW KNOW THE RIGHT FROM WRONG THAT POLITICIANS IGNORE.
Visit the Oath Keeper website and find out what Mr. Hunter is full of. Make up your own mind. Do not listen to the misrepresentations of professional politicians. Discover the real truth for yourself. Then you'll have the confidence that only knowledge can give you. We are proud to stand with Bill Hunt, a Constitutionalist, who understands his responsibility is to the people not the party.
-
Biff 05/12/2010 5:50:00 AM
Craig Hunter is your typical politically correct police management pussy. I wouldn't piss on the guy if he was on fire. Hutches is no better.
-
jont92619 04/29/2010 7:27:00 AM
Well Bob, I'm glad you sleep so well because Sandra does not issue CCW permits to allow citizens to protect themselves, but if you don't mind I'd like the opportunity to do so. I'll make you a deal, why don't we have the CCW privilege revoked from off duty police officers and Judges, then let's see how it goes. I always hear the argument that cops are on duty 24/7 and speaking as a former cop, this is bunk. Make it equal for all...
I do not fear citizens with a CCW permit who are trained and who have been screened. I fear allowing one person to decide on a whim who's life is more important than another. Sandy's policy simply reflects her bias against the second amendment. She is very adept at hiding behind the phrase, "well that what the law makes me do" whenever there is a controversial topic. (CCW, Early Release of Prisoners) She is also adept at hiding behind others rather than simply admitting her bias. You may recall that this was the MO and reason the Nazi regime was allowed to grow and fester. It was filled with bureaucrats or those with wacky agendas who wound up in power.
As for CCW she loves to say that the state ties her hands, well I hate to break it to you honey but there are many other Sheriffs in CA who issue CCW and they haven't had any trouble from the state.
As for her management style, I'd say losing the rank and file Deputy endorsement by a two to one margin tells us how she is doing there. Face facts, she sucks and it's time for her to retire.
-
Bob Berardi 04/29/2010 5:39:00 AM
Sandra Hutchins is a great person and an intense leader. Having worked for her, prior to her appointment, you should know this: She is a person who listens to all sides of an issue and makes the best decision. Not for herself, but for the greater good of all. More impressive is the fact that she's not afraid to admit her decisions may have been wrong. Unlike many people in high places, she doesn't suffer from arrogance and conceit. She is familiar with budgets. She is versed with custody issues. She has worked in the dark and in the cold like many of us. She worked the holidays and missed family moments. And, she has buried her fair share of friends and co-workers. Yes, in LA it's inevitable. Not so much in the OC. It's true that in certain parts of the country law enforcement activities very, and so does day-to-day and critical action experiences. Don't fault Sandra for having that experience or even consider introducing a gender issue as a deficit. We all experienced a dark day in law enforcement when a person, who catapaulted to fame, landed hard as a criminal. That brought down an entire organization. Not to mention a law enforcement community. As for CCW permits...personally, the less untrained and un-skilled people with guns in their cars and persons and, on the street, the better I sleep. It's one less confronation to concern myself with and should be one less confrontation you should concern yourself with. The rhetoric and personal attack references towards these candidates is childish. If you really care about quality of the candidate, evelauate your decisions based on capability, total experience, poise, character, judgement, intention, moral character, reverence and over all quality and ability to come to the table to discuss issues and concerns openly. Don't base your decisions on who will stand up to the federal government, scream the loudest, or is the most popular. Loyalty to a person is criminal. Loyalty to an organization is effective leadership. If that doesn't get your attention, then remember this advice passed down: "the loudest one in the room, is the weakest." I will cast my vote for Sandra Hutchens because she is the leadership OCSD needs. She's the leadership that will cause OCSD to rise to its feet and not embarrass you in the paper. She's the leadership that will not employ nepotism and who will bring fairness to a selection and promotion process. More importantly, she will be the leadership you want that will weed out those who have no business with a badge; those who fail to act when necessary; or even those who do not accept accountability with the oath they swore to. You will decide your vote as you have been given the right to do. All the best to everyone.
-
Oscar 04/28/2010 5:46:00 AM
Bill Hunt for Sheriff!!! “I’d put together an armed posse of deputies at the shut-off value,” said a dead-serious Hunt. LOVE IT! Someone with some real cajones.
-
Sean 04/16/2010 8:54:00 AM
Hunt is exactly what we need. A real experienced officer of the law who is going to clean up this county from years of neglect and politics. This county has been on a decline in the last 10-15 years as far as crime, drugs, gangs, illegals, and the sanctuary city that is Santa Ana. Now Lake Forest is following suit in the south AND San Juan Capistrano. He will also bring back a good name and morale to the O.C. Sheriffs department which has had a rough ride the last few years.
-
Mike 04/14/2010 12:23:00 AM
A few years back, Sheriff Baca had only a 10% endorsement from the LA Sheriff Union and yet he won overwhelmingly with 70% or so fo the votes in the County. In Fact I think it was closer to the mid 80's. Hunt in respect, really has no command experience to run a department. his Lieutenant(watch commander) experience in San Clemente is not a wise paltofrm to stand on. His work experience, while impressive in the Sheirrs dept in OC, tells me he has done very little. The cities they work out of, rarely use the swat team, I think Aliso Viejo did once last year. The other police agencies in OC never utlize the Sheriffs for anything.
In LA, the Sheriff is called quite a bit to handle many smaller police agencies swat call outs and homicides.
There has not been any real issues except for the CCW issue. That issue alone is not enough to sway the vote away from Hutches. Hutchens will win quite easily.
-
Cotysevan 04/13/2010 6:26:00 AM
LBCityGrl
What do you know about the race. Have you researched any of the ideas that any of the candidates have? Or are you taking the word of Douche Bags like LtPar? Yes Douceh Bag I'm bringing you up again, Douche Bag!
-
LBCityGirl 04/13/2010 6:03:00 AM
Wow, this Bill Hunt guy is almost as scary a candidate as LB's Mike Hedges. I'm feeling kind of sorry for OC right now!
-
Randel Young 04/08/2010 7:29:00 AM
It's little wonder that Bill Hunt was endorsed by the Deputies.
He is the only candidate for Sheriff who is even in the physical condition necessary to function as an actual professional peace officer. The other two are fat, out-of-shape, desk-bound functionnaires who would risk a cardiac to even chase a mugger across a parking lot. Bill Hunt is the pro and his fellow law enforcers recognize and respect that.
The voters should also note that Bill Hunt is a man of highest integrity. He was the one and only local official (acting police chief for San Clemente) that took on corruption in the Carona Sheriff's office. Bill Hunt did the right thing even though he knew it was not the best career move for him. He put the citizens of Orange County first. He took a stand for us now it's time for us to do our part and stand up for Bill Hunt.
-
Ltpar 04/08/2010 5:51:00 AM
Cotyseven, I'm always up for a learning experience, so could you explain my new name, i.e, "Dueche Bag?" Is that anything like a "douche bag?" You spelled it right the first time, but I suspect after sniffing all that cleaning solvent with your "gun nut" buddies, your senses are dulled (along with your intellect). If you are going to call someone a name, at least spell it right, as in Cotyseven, "you are an Ass Hole."
-
Cotysevan 04/07/2010 11:06:00 AM
LtPar and Joe Don't know. Both of you guys are Dueche Bags. LtPar, lemme guess Lieutenant Par as in golf you Dueche Bag? Thanks for letting me know Jesus loved me you Bible Thumper Dueche!
-
Thomas 04/07/2010 12:44:00 AM
I'm voting Hunt for sheriff. We need leaders. I feel he will have a positive impact on the county.
-
Joe Don't Know 04/06/2010 9:24:00 PM
TA,
When you're wasting tens of thousands of dollars of Maricopa County taxpayer's money on lawsuits, large-brand new inmate buses and other assorted crap, I'd say it's a big deal. When the voters want you gone because you're in over your head, IT'S A BIG DEAL.
Do you or have you ever lived in Maricopa County? I bet the answer is "NO".
On another note, do you think it's ok to give the voting public false promises (CCW's for one)? I bet your answer is "YES", because lying is accepted in our wonderful society, right???
-
mrgmorgan56 04/06/2010 8:02:00 PM
This guy is a putz.
-
Tenth Amender 04/06/2010 7:26:00 PM
Much about nothing Joe Don't Know.
-
Joe Don't Know 04/06/2010 10:12:00 AM
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has not
read the book he co-authored in 2008,
which includes information on Arpaio's
philosophy on America's immigration
problem and how to cope with the nation's
porous borders.
Arpaio's lack of familiarity with the book,
"Joe's Law - America's Toughest Sheriff
Takes on Illegal Immigration, Drugs and
Everything Else That Threatens America,"
was among the revelations to emerge from a
nine-hour deposition the sheriff gave as
part of a racial-profiling lawsuit filed against
the Sheriff's Office.
Arpaio's attorney, Tim Casey, said plaintiffs
are losing the racial-profiling case so their
attorneys are attacking the sheriff.
"I thought Arpaio did very well," Casey said.
"He's basically a CEO of a several thousand
person organization, and he certainly sets
policy. There's not a single thing in there
that helps their case."
Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, Jessica
Quitugua Rodriguez, David Rodriguez, Velia
Meraz and Manuel Nieto, Jr., all allege in the
suit filed in U.S. District Court that deputies
searched them without cause or
unreasonably detained them between
September 2007 and March 2008.
The plaintiffs are represented by David
Bodney, who also represents the Republic,
among other Valley media organizations.
Bodney made the deposition transcript
available.
Casey pointed out that attorneys are given
broad latitude in deposition to ask questions
about anything that might lead to the
discovery of more evidence that could be
admissible to a case.
Among the other details that emerged
during Arpaio's Dec. 16 deposition.
• Arpaio has not read the racial-profiling
claim related to the deposition.
• Arpaio has not instituted any training for
deputies on racial profiling, and he does not
believe any training is necessary.
• Arpaio says he was not well versed on the
Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,
or its counterpart in the Arizona
Constitution, which prohibit unreasonable
searches and seizures. He says he relies on
his legal team to deal with those intricacies.
• Arpaio frequently claims ignorance about
the details of Sheriff's Office operations and
repeatedly states that reporters misquote
him and take what he says out of context in
stories for print and television media.
Throughout the deposition, Arpaio comes
across as a leader who prefers to delegate
ample amounts of authority to high-ranking
sheriff's officials and media-relations staff
members. The bulk of Arpaio's testimony in
the deposition involved his public-speaking
engagements, appearances in television
shows on FOXNews and CNN and quotes
related to the sheriff's immigration-
enforcement policy Arpaio gave members of
the print media.
Bodney refers to statements Arpaio made in
those forums in an effort to paint a picture
of a sheriff who is often inclined to pursue
law-enforcement policies - whether it's
forcing inmates to wear pink underwear or
making immigration a top priority - with an
equal emphasis on how the practices will
play out with the voting public as he has in
the impact on crime.
"Is it possible that your reason for moving
forward on this get-tough (immigration)
policy is because it is popular or might
become popular?" Bodney asks.
After an objection from Arpaio's attorney
about whether the question already was
asked, Arpaio responds:
"I could say 'no' with a straight 'no,' but -
maybe I should not say this, but I have been
sheriff for 17 years. I have been reelected 15
years without the illegal immigration
problem, so I don't do this for politics."
Arpaio on Monday called the release of his
deposition testimony a public-relations
move from the plaintiffs. He said he
responded to questions truthfully, but did
not elaborate when it was not required.
"In depositions, they'll ask you questions
100 different ways and try to trick you," A
rpaio said. "When you have 4,000 employees,
and I have a philosophy to delegate, I do
know what's going on in general terms. I
don't micro-manage."
Copyright © 2010, azcentral.com.
-
Tenth Amender 04/05/2010 2:31:00 AM
Well then it didn't take much effort to get LtPar riled up now did it. Old Kona Lanes? Across from the old Kerm Rima? ;) Never been there but I can see you know all about it.
-
Tai 04/04/2010 10:01:00 AM
I'm a Republican and I'm voting for Bill Hunt. I reviewed each of the candidates web sites. I read and watched the various debates and forums. The only person who has a plan and is not afraid to commit it to public record is Bill Hunt. He is the only candidate who has the intimate knowledge of the Orange County Sheriff's department thanks to his 20 plus years of service. But most of all, he is the only candidate who actually appears to passionately want the job. All three candidates are qualified for the position. All three have served our community well. But Bill is the only one who does not sound like a politician to me. He sounds like a sheriff. And if his fellow deputies back him, then that's enough for me. For those of you who don't have a dog in this fight, i urge you to do your own independent research. I am confident that you will come to the same conclusion as I have. Bill Hunt is the best candidate to serve as our sheriff.
-
CB 04/04/2010 6:15:00 AM
Conspicuous by their absence from this story are the names of Mike "Darth" Schroeder and DA-for-life Tony "T-Rack" Rackakas (sp?). Those of us with attention spans longer than a twitter remember it was actually Schroeder who was Carona's chief political operative. Are Darth and T-Rack letting 2nd-stringer Baugh (I know he's the chairman, but so what) ostensibly carry the party's water in this 1st round, only to swoop in when a runoff is necessary? Also, I doubt that 3rd-string candidate Hunter's name similarity with Hunt is a coincidence. This will cost Hunt maybe hundreds of votes, especially in the "elder-rich" towns such as Laguna Woods.
-
Ltpar 04/04/2010 5:08:00 AM
cotyseven and Tenth Amender, so the gloves come off in this little philosophical discussion? You two sound enough alike to be clones, or even significant others. I am definitely not your brother, but are you sure we have never met, perhaps at the old Kona Lanes in Costa Mesa. We used to get a lot of limp ----- there, just like you guys; shooting off their big mouths, but not able to score, until the handcuffs went on. Didn't you just love those black tile walls in the men's room?
By the way, thanks for the compliment. "Douche Bag," is one of the nicer names I have been called in many years. Sorry, but you guys have got to do a lot better than that, to hurt my feelings.
The medicinal marijuana tea you guys drank to get a "vision" of who I am, must be the same stuff Obama is feeding his clones. Add a little LSD, next time and it might clear your mind right up. As much as I would like to be collecting consultant fees from a political candidate, I am not an operative, paid or otherwise and don't have a horse in the race. You were right on one point, I do "leech" but it is in Afghanistan and Iraq training Cops. For the record, my home has been in Orange County for over thirty years and I have nothing to do with Los Angeles. Keep smiling, Jesus loves you.
-
cotysevan 04/03/2010 10:10:00 AM
Ltpar....Classy words. I didnt resort to name calling you douche bag!
-
Yoshida 04/03/2010 8:34:00 AM
Go Hunt... I have had the oppoutunity to have a one on one meeting with all three candidates for the next Sheriff. Hunter is a very nice real person who does not stand a chance against Hunt. Sandra has driven moral even further into the gutter so God bless Bill Hunt for sticking to principle even when at times it wasn't popular. Hunt will win and the taxpayers of O.C. will be the ultimate winners.
-
OC Native 04/03/2010 8:16:00 AM
CARRUTH. This IS civil as far as blogs go. What's wrong with you? :)
-
Tenth Amender 04/03/2010 8:00:00 AM
Martinb. Dude you totally sidestepped the issue of the PACs. I am shocked! Bwahhaha. Hey brother Ltpar. Cut the crap. You are a paid operative who's song and dance doesn't detract from the fact that the old lady is an appointed import out of touch with Orange County. You are just a Troll cruising all the blogs professing your infinite wisdom. You are obviously some old fart sucking Hutchens campaign contributions dry with your "consultant" fees. Political "leech" comes to mind. Remember the name of our airport is "John Wayne" airport. Have you ever heard of the guy? It is NOT, repeat NOT Lee Baca or Peter Pitches airport. John Wayne you may recall was a Second Amendment buff. So you LA types should drag your sorry tails back to that gang banging crime pit you call home.
-
Dawn 04/03/2010 3:43:00 AM
Lol, in this political climate, independent is the best thing to be. I am SO shocked that the GOP establishment would chastize someone for being independent! (/s obviously :) )
-
ANON 04/03/2010 2:14:00 AM
Bill Hunt is a proven Oath Keeper and will not back down from bureaucrats such as Hutchens and Hunter their phonies...
Look how mad these spammars get from a positive article for Hunt. Their fuming because their going to get ran over this election. The only defense they have is sit defenseless on their computers and talk, talk, talk... BILL HUNT FOR SHERIFF VOTE JUNE 8!!
-
CARRUTH 04/03/2010 1:51:00 AM
Please keep comments civil, and even if you believe that Mr. Hunt is full of S..., maybe you can be more mature and explain why. Maybe if you went and visited everyone's website, then you could make more of a mature decision and comment. For me, it is BillHuntForSheriff.com, ro you maybe it is Craig Hunter or Sandra Hutchens. Let us all try to back up our passionate feelings with logical debate, like they do. Thank you.
-
Kiko 04/03/2010 1:29:00 AM
"Bill Hunt=The Next Obama"
Well said & oh so true.
Keep making those promises, Bill. You even know you're full of shit.
-
martinb 04/03/2010 1:09:00 AM
10th Amender,
Hutchens - $55,378.00 = for this period and $63,087.00 year to date and $81,885.78 cash on hand
Hunter - $39,134.00 = for this period and $56,634.00 year to date and $24,958.55 cash on hand
Hunt - $37,437.00 = for this period and $37,437 year to date and $3,606.93 cash on hand
Orange County Registrar of Voters
Is there no end to what you will say? $3,000 cash on hand? Sheriff Sandra would annihilate disgraced former Lt. Hunt. She has about 25times the amount of cash on hand.
you assume the union's as bad at investing and math as you. I guess we'll see.
p.s. grown ups cite sources and statistics
-
Ltpar 04/02/2010 11:52:00 PM
cotyseven, how about you "kiss my ass." Is that new, fresh and subtle enough for you?
You support your candidate, I'll support mine and never the twain shall meet. On the day after the election, we will then see who was right and who was wrong, and please no whining.
As far as the troops following, they will follow whomever is elected Sheriff. They followed Mike Corona, even being led down the wrong path? I remind you that only 50% of the Association Members endorsed Bill Hunt and they consider him to be their favorite son. The challenge here is, to provide them with the leadership needed to move the Sheriff's Department ahead and not three steps back. Yes, I do believe that Sandra Hutchens will provide the best leadership of the two real contenders for the job. Bill Hunt has a lot of potential, but still needs a little fine tuning before becoming Sheriff.
-
Tenth Amender 04/02/2010 11:35:00 PM
Martinb doesn't know what he doesn't know. Aside from presumably not liking any of the candidates, he hasn't been following the money game. Hutchens might have $70,000 ON HAND. Hunt, in addition to his own fundraising efforts, has about 4 PACs endorsing him including the 800 pound gorilla PAC that Hutchens basically called out. That makes it about 5-1 in favor of Hunt in the money game.
Except for the venues this is what the crime rate looks like:
#1 Sanctuary City – Anaheim
Population 333,746
Violent Crimes 1,312
Homicides 11
Forcible Rapes 83
Robbery 573
#2 Sanctuary City – Santa Ana
Population 339,674
Violent Crimes 1,726
Homicides 30
Forcible Rapes 66
Robbery 842
-
good game 04/02/2010 10:21:00 PM
i cant wait to see one of these 800 year olds get taken to county for driving on the wrong side of the road. of course it would never happen, but it would be nice.
there is no winner in this election. we all lose
-
Mark92691 04/02/2010 9:55:00 PM
"advocate cuts in public subsidies to the criminal-defense bar working on behalf of the indigent"
That isn't what I heard. Bill Hunt was complaining that 90% of criminal defendants in Orange County get a public defender (at taxpayer expense). And then he asked if that many of them could possibly be indigent. My interpretation of his remarks is that he would institute or recommend some sort of means test rather than automatically giving everyone who asks for one, a public defender.
-
TommyGun 04/02/2010 9:37:00 PM
Sandy will be retiring very soon. Bill Hunt for Sheriff!!
-
martinb 04/02/2010 8:51:00 PM
Hutchens will make mince meat of Bill Hunt in the run off.
What has changed since the last time he ran? Hunt is still screaming about Mike Carona who is no where in site and Hunt has less money and less endorsements this time round. Am I wrong? He has less money and endorsements. He had the AOCDS thing last time right? I dont like Hutchens, and I dont know Hunter that well, but in the end we need a new Sheriff and Hunt just has zero experience. Dont give me this he ran a jail crap, thats not a city, and dont trash Anaheim which has more landmarks in it than anywhere else in the county. When i take my kids to a ball game i feel safe at Angel stadium. We should all take a good look at who will make us safe.
Oh, and as for sending armed deputies to take on federal agents and removing public defenders from the jail, that's not even in the Sheriff's purview. This reminds me of all the things Obama said he would do, and despite the intelligent screaming that those things werent possible they elected him anyway for yelling that he would do those things. Bill Hunt - the next Obama.
-
jont92619 04/02/2010 7:42:00 PM
If Craig Hunter is such a great choice for OC Sheriff why hasn't the Anaheim Chief of Police or the Anaheim Police Association endorsed him? What do they know that we don't?
-
Tenth Amender 04/02/2010 7:21:00 PM
Hutchens is an LA bureaucrat and former 10 year democrat who has publicly stated that she is fashioning Orange County Sheriff's into the image of LA Sheriff's department. If that elitist attitude isn't enough for you, the appointed import is not adverse to spying on elected officials, intimidating persons from exercising their first amendment right before a public body because those persons were there to criticize her and then denying that any of that occurred. The constitutional right to bear arms is also a problem for Hutchens. It is not a right to be had by the "little people". So it is no wonder she has a problem with states rights. After all, it is her plan to turn all of our local jails into Federal Detention Centers to house criminal illegal aliens. To make this happen she is early releasing criminals into our streets now. Send the carpetbagger back to LA where she clearly belongs.
-
Catherine 04/02/2010 7:19:00 PM
Bill Hunt has proven he has integrity and fortitude - he is the only Sheriff that had to courage to stand up to Carona's unethical behavior when everyone else looked the other way. He will help restore Orange County to it's greatness! Another vote for Bill Hunt!
-
jont92619 04/02/2010 11:36:00 AM
I'd take Sheriff Joe over Hutchens or Hunter any day....
-
Oh my 04/02/2010 11:07:00 AM
Joe Arpaio is a fucking nimrod and the citizens of Maricopa County are getting tired of his shit.
You can go to azcentral.com and read all the articles. I guess Orange County better buckle in if Hunt becomes the next Sheriff. OC is no Maricopa County. The lawsuits will begin flowing in by the busload.
What a mess....
-
cotysevan 04/02/2010 9:39:00 AM
Ltpar...DO you know how to write something new or do you use the same post everywhere you go big guy? You cant possibly think that the troops would follow Hutchens into battle do you? Let me re-phrase that, You don't possibly think that Hutchens is a leader do you?
The deputies have spoken! Back off Ltpar!
-
Hunt 04/02/2010 9:28:00 AM
Great article. Hunt gets my vote.
-
Ltpar 04/02/2010 8:12:00 AM
I recently had a chance to watch the Sheriff's Association Candidate Forum on the internet. The forum was well done. The questions asked, hit most of the issues that the Sheriff must deal with. Also, the more the forum continued the more interesting it became. Many dispersions being cast by those with axes to grind toward Sandra Hutchens, were blown out of the water by her responses. Having participated in such candidate forums for many years, I made a few observations.
Of the three candidatess, only one, Craig Hunter, should have not been on the stage. He was not a good speaker, probably has a few inside contacts, but was very poorly prepared to discuss issues and solutions. If he were smart, Hunter would withdraw from the race, as he will draw off potential votes from Bill Hunt.
As a former law enforcement professional in Orange County, how can one not like Bill Hunt. In fact, listening to him, I saw a lot of myself from the old days. His enthusiasm, committment to the deputies, experience in all aspects of organizational operations, and future vision, made me want to support him. Bill is strong on leadership skills, but would have to tone down his act slightly with the public. I could sense his inexperience in a few critical areas, especially the political ramifications of the job which impact his ability to get elected. I think Bill will do better than expected in November, but barring any major scandals at the Department will not beat Sandra Hutchens. I fully understand why the Association endorsed Bill, as he is one of their own.
The third candidate, Sandra Hutchens, not being an inspirational, rah, rah, leader, like Bill Hunt, nontheless has her own style, confidence and professionalism, which comes across well in public. She has command experience in a Sheriffs department, which none of the other candidates have. Hutchens was completely accurate in her statement that running a Sheriffs Department is a lot different than a regular Police Department (Anaheim). Hutchens more than adequately fielded all the issues, that many like to criticize her for, especially the Los Angeles vs Orange County garbage. Having worked on many occasions with Los Angeles Police Department and Los Angeles Sheriffs Department, I know them both to be top notch professional agencies. We all had a common goal, put the criminal in jail. The CCW issue was also well covered by Hutchens. For those with short memories, I point out the intense criticism of Mike Corona for handing out the permits to his friends and contributors. Much of this criticism was by people who now blast Hutchens for tightening up the process. I believe this is called, "Damned if you do and damned if you don't." Either way, it is not a big voter issue. Hutchens has had to deal with a financial crisis that no other Sheriff before her has done and appears to be handling it well. No Sheirffs Deputies have lost their jobs, or are likely to do so in the future. Bottom line with Sandra Hutchens, is she is on track with moving OCSO from a good organization, to an excellent one. I believe the majority of voters will concur in November and provide her with the votes she deserves.
The only advice I would have for Sandra Hutchens is; after the waters have settled from the campaign, get together for a one on one with Bill Hunt. Not only could Bill be a tremendous asset to the Management Team of the Sheriffs Department, he could be groomed as the Sheriff of the future. That would be a win-win for the people of Orange County.
-
Steagle 04/02/2010 7:55:00 AM
I don't know about you, but this guy scares me. His rants and attitude are reminiscent of Adolf Hitler.
-
jont92619 04/02/2010 6:12:00 AM
Wow tanner, looks like that article was from December 2003... I know the government is slow and inefficient but I think if Hunt had done anything wrong they would have done something about it by now..
Yes, beat the dead horse of the unsuccessful lawsuit... If that's all you Hunter & Hutchens supporters have to prove you are the better choice for Sheriff, you should just keep your traps shut and pray people vote for your candidates out of confusion over the similar names.
-
cotysevan 04/02/2010 5:49:00 AM
I have seen the candidates in many forums and it seems as though Hutchens doesnt want the job. Hunter, doesnt seem to have the support and Hunt always has the people behind him. Great Article
-
Cotysevan 04/02/2010 5:41:00 AM
Great article. I have seen the candidates in open forums and Hunt has answers. Hutchens and the other guy remind me of a stumped Sponge Bob and Patrick! The should go pick their belly buttons in retirement!
-
tannerM 04/02/2010 5:19:00 AM
I guess the spelling geniuses over at your little blog are right and the attorney general is wrong, grand jury, and everyone else. How many times has this guy run for Sheriff? Better yet, how many times has this guy sued the county? Has he ever won either? He needs to face facts, he will NEVER get his hand on our tax dollars ever, EVER again
-
jont92619 04/02/2010 5:00:00 AM
Yawn... Old news tanner. The incident was investigated and nothing wrong was done. Once again the desperate Craig Hunter camp slings mud against Bill Hunt that is baseless...
www.whoiscraighunter.com
-
jont92619 04/02/2010 4:56:00 AM
Great article..... Hopefully the voters will come out to support Hunt.
-
tannerM 04/02/2010 4:55:00 AM
http://www.ocweekly.com/2003-12-04/news/our-little-secret/
that is one remarkable rise
-
Vote Bill Hunt june 8 04/02/2010 4:44:00 AM
It's time to elect Bill Hunt a true oath keeper!