Judge Goes Easy on CHP Pervert

[Moxley Confidential] After trying to screw a minor, Lieutentent Stephen Deck predicted he'd walk. He was very nearly right

One Orange County judge signals his philosophy to jurors by hanging a poster of a shoot-first-ask-questions-later Clint Eastwood character in his courtroom. Judge M. Marc Kelly is more subtle. The wall to Kelly’s left—the one that faces jurors who sit in his 10th-floor courtroom—is loaded with Notre Dame paraphernalia, including a headshot of the university’s loudmouth former football coach, Lou Holtz. It’s odd artwork in a criminal-justice setting for several reasons, including that Holtz famously uttered about a player, “He had shoulder surgery on his elbow.”

In the Orange County district attorney’s office, many believe Kelly recently made his own gaffe. He ignored prosecution and probation department requests of stern punishment for a condom-carrying, 51-year-old police officer who attempted to have sex with a 13-year-old Laguna Beach girl after she revealed her parents had left home for the evening. Prosecutor Robert Mestman wanted Stephen Robert Deck sent to prison because Deck had loudly proclaimed his innocence, lost a lewd-conduct jury trial in 2009, isn’t remorseful and “continues to be a danger to society.”

During the March 19 sentencing, a weepy, trembling Deck—who was a California Highway Patrol (CHP) lieutenant in OC when he was arrested in February 2006—pleaded for mercy. Reading from a handwritten note, he told Kelly that he had “no excuses,” he wasn’t a pedophile, and he’s “tackled the issues.”

“I’m asking for the opportunity to be on probation,” said Deck, who was handcuffed to his chair and wearing an orange OC Jail jump suit. “I will do well. I’m truly sorry for my actions.”

Deck’s acts were despicable. He used the Internet to search for underage sex partners in the sixth, seventh and eighth grades—or younger. For example, according to law-enforcement records, the CHP officer told Kristin, his 13-year-old Costa Mesa online-chatting partner, to turn off the Yahoo Messenger archiving feature on her computer so her mother couldn’t discover their relationship. Then he tried to lure the girl to a hotel room near South Coast Plaza. He hoped to get her pregnant there, according to a later-recovered chat log.

Court records show Deck also solicited Allison, a 13-year-old girl living in the Pacific Northwest. During an online chat, he sought sex with her and her 10-year-old sister. The veteran cop suggested that after they met, the trio’s foreplay should begin in the kitchen, where they’d eat food off one another’s naked bodies.

In chats with Jennifer, another underage girl living in an unknown location, the unmarried, 5-foot-8-inch, 170-pound Deck repeatedly sought a rendezvous. He told the minor he wanted “to eat her beautiful, young cunt” and stuff “daddy’s cock in my lil [sic] gurls [sic] pussy.” It’s unclear if he ever met this teen. What is certain, however, is that Deck belonged to an online incest-themed club called “Daddies & Daughters.”

The worst-known case involved Amy, the 13-year-old in Laguna Beach. While chatting online, he told the seventh-grader she was “hot” and “sexy.” He said he wished “people didn’t make such a big deal about older/younger.” He expressed concern to Amy that she might tell her mother. When at ease, he asked the girl if she “liked sucking cock.”

During a Feb. 18, 2006, chat, Amy told Deck that her parents had left for the evening. It was the opportunity he craved. The off-duty cop drove 45 minutes from his San Diego County home. In anticipation of what he’d called “that daughter/daddy thing,” he carried condoms.

In case it was a trap, he also carried pie as a cheap prop to help explain why he’d emphatically told the girl he wanted to eat her . . . pie. It turned out that the girl was actually a decoy working in conjunction with Laguna Beach police and Perverted Justice, the citizen group featured on Dateline NBC’s “To Catch a Predator” series. Besides Deck, the sting nabbed 12 other men.

Kelly—a former prosecutor—knew Deck’s “voracious sexual addiction” problems well: He presided over the trial. “There is no doubt in my mind that you would have gone through with sexual acts with a minor if [the Laguna Beach girl] hadn’t been a decoy,” the judge said. “That scares me.”

According to guidelines, Kelly could have sentenced Deck to anywhere from zero to four years in state prison. Mestman wanted the maximum; Deck didn’t want to spend a minute in prison. While the majority of the men nabbed in the sting quickly professed guilt and received probation plus 365 days in the local jail, two unemployed men—one Vietnamese-American, the other Mexican-American—each got 18 months in the state penitentiary.

Before making his announcement, Kelly noted that Deck, who is white, had been a cop during the commission of his crime. “That ought to count for something,” said the judge. To Mestman, it meant that Deck’s fall from grace was worse; after all, the CHP officer had held a high position of public trust. TheOrange County Register had quoted Deck on crime-prevention matters.

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Jsheresh 02/12/2012 8:48:00 PM

    Where does Mr. Deck reside now.

  • Jo WOods 03/31/2010 7:08:00 PM

    Wow, thats just messed up dude, That guy has some serious issues. Lou www.anon-browsing.eu.tc

  • F****** Amazing! 03/31/2010 1:42:00 AM

    I guess this means it's open season on our children as long as the perpetrator holds a position of power? It stand to reason that this former CHP officer is many times more of a threat than the average person due to his knowledge of law enforcement procedure, and the law itself. What if this was his neighbor's child and the parents tried to prosecute? What would they have been up against? These types of predators are infinitely MORE DANGEROUS than the average offender, and the punishment should have reflected that.

  • Uh-huh 03/29/2010 8:48:00 AM

    Yeah "jessi", he was apologetic and remorseful BECAUSE HE GOT CAUGHT. And he was terrified he was going to prison, where he wouldn't have his own private cell anymore. Where was his "remorse" during that long period of time he was conducting this bullshit? We'll see how he does while he's a 290 registrant-on probation.

  • Finley 03/28/2010 1:43:00 PM

    Way to go Perverted Justice!

  • jessi 03/28/2010 6:15:00 AM

    jamalynollinger makes some very valid points. Ltpar, on the other hand sounds like an uninformed, ignorant and not to bright. one oes not occupy the judges bench easily. not only is he requiredto know the law impeccably, he must also be able to exercise discretion in regards to the demeanor of the deft., which in this casewas very sincerely apologetic and remorseful. knowing steve as i do, i agree with the judge in reference to steve's sincerity. there should be more judges posessing the savy judge kelly has demonstrated in his careful and thorough consideration of the facts in this case. god bless...

  • LINSTER 03/27/2010 7:27:00 PM

    I LOVE YOU, MICHELLE..

  • jamalyn ollinger 03/27/2010 5:06:00 AM

    Judge goes easy? It appears that you can not attend a trial, know little about the Judge, other than his Notre Dame affiliation, not read or consider the sentencing report and psychological evaluations of the defendant and decide the proper punishment on a case because that is what you did in your article. But not only did you do that you also maligned the character of a very well respected, bright, and hard working Judge. Until you have sat in the chair requiring you to meet out punishment armed with all the relevant information about a case you are not qualified to determine what the sentence in this case or any other case should be. Judge Kelley had access to all of that information and he alone was qualified to determine what sentence should be imposed. I am certain that Judge Kelley considered the fact that most of the persons arrested for the same conduct during the sting were sentenced to a year in jail and probation which was the sentence he imposed on this defendant. Judge Kelley knows that an individual should never be punished for exercising his right to a trial with a higher sentence than those who plead guilty unless there is something additional meriting a harsher punishment. Judge Kelley was also aware of what several psycologists said about the proper punishment for the defendant and he could not have sentenced him to probation without those doctor's reports saying he was not a danger to society. Judge Kelley was also very aware of the fact that his sentence allows for a probation officer to closely moniter the defendan's conduct for five years which would not happen if the sentence was prison. So in imposing the probation sentence Judge Kelley was actually assuring that the defendant will be under the watchful eye of a probation officer which gives society a much greater protection against recidivism on the part of the defendant than does a prison sentence. Rather than maligning the character of a well respected Judge you should be commending him for not only imposing a legally proper sentence but one that gives society greater protection from the defendant should there be any risk he will reoffend. Meeting out punishment is an awesome responsibility and Judge Kelley acted out that responsibility in this case properly. Rather than maligning Judge Kelly's character you should be commending it and you should refrain from criticism when you are not fully informed of the facts needed to punish a defendant.

  • Bruce M 03/27/2010 1:01:00 AM

    The government class always takes care of its own. Besides, it wasn't such a big thing. The girls were all members of the peon class not the government class so it really doesn't matter. Now had it been an adult member of the peon class wanting to express his desires for young sex with the daughter of a member of the government class, well now, that would be a problem!

  • Ltpar 03/27/2010 12:14:00 AM

    Who knows what goes on in the minds of a Judge, but it is adequately clear that Kelly fumbled the ball big time on this case. If this is a typical decision that he renders, Kelly needs to be voted out of office next time he is up for confirmation. This case would have been a perfect example for the Criminal Justice System to send a strong message to those who are predators and who select children as their victims. Thes suspect should have gone to jail for the maximum allowable sentence and experienced what child molesters get there.

  • Shenanigans Continue 03/26/2010 10:21:00 AM

    Mr. Moxley, Thank you for your comprehensive report on this case. It's creepy, disgusting, and despicable that Deck was conducting this activity while serving as a law enforcement supervisor and manager. "Yes, Jesus. Thank you, Jesus", huh? Seems like Judge Kelly's courtroom sees a lot of colorful CHP (past and present) characters. Baffling......

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy