When Is It Not a Crime for an Adult to Hook Up With a Seventh-Grader?

[Moxley Confidential] Are there too many holes in the case against John Stuart Moses?

New Orange County resident John Stuart Moses was eager to find friends in December 2007, and not anticipating a looming law-enforcement disaster for himself, he felt elated when a horny local girl sent an e-mail message to his personal profile on Vampirefreaks.com.

Moses, 23, and the girl chatted on AOL Instant Messenger and discovered similar interests in Gothic and industrial music; they exchanged telephone numbers. The next day, they began a series of dates that, depending on who is telling the story, included varying degrees of physical intimacy.

Police, who learned of the relationship from a tip, arrested Moses, and prosecutors charged him with committing lewd acts on a minor. To get out of jail, he paid $100,000 bail. The girl—we’ll call her Jane Doe—had presented herself to Moses as an 18-year-old. According to court records, Doe’s looks suggested otherwise to Moses, but she addressed his suspicions by explaining that everyone in her family had “baby faces.” In fact, less than two months earlier, Doe celebrated her 13th birthday.

Skip ahead two years to last week: On the eighth floor of Orange County’s Central Courthouse in Santa Ana, a tense Moses asked a jury to acquit him of three sex-crime felony charges because, he explained, he’d been duped by a teenage “liar.”

“I really feel like I’m the victim, if there’s a victim,” Moses testified. “I feel like I was fooled. I still feel like I did nothing wrong.”

In this case, Doe—the animated, hair-tossing Anaheim Hills seventh-grader who admitted to using Ecstasy pills, alcohol and marijuana at the age of 12—told police she’d been a willing sexual partner who lied about her age in an effort to advance her relationship with Moses. In California, however, minors cannot ever give legal consent for sex. A suspect can’t even take comfort if the underage person instigated the intimacy. According to Deputy District Attorney Robert Mestman, state law also blocks as a defense the ignorance or mistaken judgment about a minor’s age.

Would a jury ignore the law and feel sympathy for Moses?

Events leading to the jury’s deliberations were relatively swift. Though there was a pretrial estimate the case would take three days to complete, Mestman, the prosecutor, and Christian Jensen, the defense lawyer, presented the entirety of their evidence to the jury in about 90 minutes. The government’s main witness was Doe, now 15 and admittedly reluctant to be in court. On the witness stand, she played with her long brown hair, made faces, chewed on a finger, occasionally stuck out her tongue and, at one point, sucked on a cloth string attached to her black hooded coat.

Under the guidance of Mestman, Doe testified she’d sneaked out to meet Moses on three occasions in the public-library parking lot across the street from her mom’s home. They’d talked, listened to music, took car rides, shopped, ate together, hugged and French-kissed. She acknowledged massaging Moses’ crotch through his pants, allowing him to fondle her breasts and, turning red-faced and stealing quick glances at jurors, declared, “I sucked his penis with my mouth.” She even admitted she gave him directions to an industrial area in the city of Orange where they parked and hopped into the back seat. The prosecutor got Doe to confirm Moses had put on a condom and attempted to engage in sexual intercourse.

“We tried to have sex, but we couldn’t,” she testified. “Not that we couldn’t. We didn’t. He was frustrated.”

“John put the tip of his penis in your vagina?” Mestman asked.

“Yeah,” Doe replied.

“Are you being truthful?”

“Yeah, it just wouldn’t go all the way in.”

At the defense table, Moses’ shoulders slumped. He exhaled and slowly shook his head. A lone male juror, who’d been watching the defendant’s response, scribbled a note.

But Doe’s assertion had been prefaced by some of the weakest testimony I’ve ever witnessed.

For example, the prosecutor asked about the first evening Moses and Doe met.

“What did you do?” Mestman asked.

“I don’t remember,” she said.

“Did you talk?”

“Oh, yeah.”

“What else did you do?”

“I don’t remember.”

“Did you hold hands?”

“Maybe.”

“Did you kiss?”

“Maybe,” she said. “Oh, yeah, maybe. But I don’t remember.”

Regarding another alleged encounter, Doe fared no better.

“What did you do that night?”

“I really don’t remember,” she responded. “It’s hard to remember specifics.”

Mestman repeated his question.

“Ummm,” she said. “Ummm, I don’t remember.”

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Bob 09/28/2011 9:11:00 PM

    That's easy to say, and clear to us mature adults, but John Moses was a young, dumb, gullible fool who still believed women when they talked. He didn't stand a chance. Thing is, there will always be 18-25+ year old gullible fools who are easily duped by women. Not much we can do about that. But we can fix the law that says anyone who has sex with a woman who appears under 30 is in danger of being convicted as a sex offender, since we are all responsible for determining their age, even if they lie and have fake IDs.

  • 09/23/2011 6:13:00 AM

    THE owner of this site was with minor and evrey member on VP know , but they coverup on him .you will see 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 17 / and over the age of 18 showing there titts or any other body part on camera , The filth words IS THE MAIN words members use / The word under age use on the VP, older people feel shame TO say .THE groups that members creat is filthy from pot to sex . the only way a person can see the chat is by joining .the members have code of silence they don't say any think becuase they all devil worshiper or pot smoker / or think they blood sucker / or dracula / most of the members photo is sexull and they all piant there body with blood or holding a knife So the site is beyound sickness / bipolar . kidds are members of cult or cults there famely don't know about them .

  • Shit 04/14/2011 12:06:00 AM

    This is why Vampirefreaks.com has an age limit. Meet the age limit, but keep your real age and real pictures. If she looked young, don't go out with her. But, why shit all on the site when how much shit has happened with MySpace and Facebook. Seriously?

  • G-funk 03/17/2010 5:27:00 AM

    Let this be lesson to all the dudes out there if you have doubts you better find out everything about the girl. It's not worth it, this really fucks up your life. Remember this there is other girls out there.

  • Omar $ 03/05/2010 8:51:00 AM

    Props to Jensen's legal aid for helping him to pick out a bunch of retarded ass jurors. This is a shame! Only in OC!

  • Omar $ 03/05/2010 8:50:00 AM

    Props To Jensen's legal aid for helping him pick out a bunch of retarded ass jurors.

  • truths 03/05/2010 4:21:00 AM

    It appears the OCDA is struggling with adding "conviction" notches on its prosecution belt nowadays. With budget cuts, it is odd the DA has enough in his budget to finance the re-trial in the Moses case, and also felt it was crucial in the interests of justice to appeal OCSC Judge Richard King's ruling, which the appellate court upheld in the unpublished decision dated 3/4/10, shown below. This information is based on public information at www.occourts.org. It also appears the "prosecution team" for the John Stuart Moses (09CF0367) case and the Christopher John Ontiveros case (09WF2599) are no longer exist on the court's online database. And, with the trial of former SAUSD teacher Lee Dinnie Henry (05CF3887) approaching after 4 plus years of hearings, Henry is no longer represented by the infamous criminal defense attorney Jack Earley. The DA definitely has some challenging prosecution decisions pending...... hopefully, those decisions will be in the best interests of the public's safety and justice. Still cannot figure out why the DA appealed the case below: Filed 3/4/10 P. v. Wandario CA4/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HENRY WANDARIO, Defendant and Respondent. G041114 (Super. Ct. No. 07NF0784) O P I N I O N Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Richard F. Toohey, Judge. AFFIRMED. Tony Rackauckas, District Attorney, Jessica Bingham and Stephen Sauer,Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Martin Kassman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Respondent. * * * A jury convicted defendant Henry Wandario of kidnapping for robbery (Pen. Code, § 209, subd. (b)(1)); all further statutory references are to this code), false imprisonment (§ 236) as lesser included offense of kidnapping for rape (§ 209, subd. (b)(1)), robbery (§ 211), aggravated assault (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)), and making criminal threats (§ 422). It also found the great bodily injury allegations true as to the robbery and aggravated assault counts. (§ 12022.7.) On defendant’s motion, the trial court dismissed the kidnapping for robbery count citing section 1181 and stating it “believe[d] that the movement of the victim in relation to the crime of robbery was really incidental . . . .” It subsequently sentenced defendant to the upper term of five years in prison on the robbery count, plus three years for the great bodily injury enhancement, and stayed or imposed concurrent terms on the remaining counts. The Orange County District Attorney contends the court erred in “disregard[ing] the jury’s verdict and dismiss[ing] the kidnapping for robbery” count. We disagree and affirm the judgment. See decision at: http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/npopinions.cgi

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy