[Moxley Confidential] Jury Tells 'The Signal' Attacker Steven Walter Robinson to Go to Hell

A Nightmare On Lemon Street
A defendant on trial for attempted murders in an OC theater blamed the devil. The jury told him to go to hell

Evan Yarbrough

Unlike private defense attorneys, public defenders can’t pick their clients. If they could, Orange County public defender Erica Gambale might not have represented attempted-murder suspect Steven Walter Robinson. On Feb. 24, 2008, Robinson—a 25-year-old Anaheim man obsessed with sexually deviant serial killers—used a knife and a hammer to ambush two unarmed strangers in a public place you would assume was safe from horrific violence: the inside of an upscale, suburban movie theater.

“When I got the case, I kind of really freaked-out,” Gambale told Robinson’s jury of six men and six women in her Sept. 28 closing argument. “I’m not going to lie about it.”

According to Gambale, her husband, prosecutor Keith Bogardus, is “a huge movie buff.” The couple enjoyed attending the opening nights of films—until Robinson’s unprovoked assault inside the AMC Theater on Lemon Street in Fullerton. The crime gave Gambale anxiety. Instead of focusing on the films, she analyzed other moviegoers. She didn’t like anyone to sit behind her and repeatedly demanded to change seats.

“I was nuts in there,” said Gambale. “But that was before I ever spoke to my client and the doctors and discovered the truth.”

The truth, according to the public defender, is that Robinson shouldn’t be feared. His actions were understandable in light of his consumption of whiskey and 10 to 12 grams of illegal psychedelic mushrooms for seven hours leading up to the crime, argued Gambale. But she also took the intoxication defense a step further. She claimed that her inebriated client believed that the low-budget horror flick he was watching had sent him telepathic messages, urging him to attack.

One online critic aptly described The Signal as a “bloody banquet of excessive, tasteless gore.” In the early minutes of the movie, a crazed man chops up restrained, screaming women in a back yard. Before Robinson’s real-life attack, an odd, distorted image appeared on the screen accompanied by an annoying, warped, bass-heavy sound—the signal for the actors to go crazy and kill.

“Mr. Robinson fully believed his hallucinations were real,” Gambale explained. “His actions were in response to voices he heard. He was experiencing an altered reality. . . . He couldn’t have known the consequences of his actions.”

Besides, she argued, Robinson was a sympathetic character: a lonely guy who struggled throughout his life with a weight problem, craved attention, fell into the dark world of substance abuse as an escape and genuinely felt sorry for “any pain” he’d inflicted on his fellow moviegoers. Given that Gambale didn’t dispute Robinson committed the acts (she couldn’t—DNA at the scene made him a trillion-to-one suspect), she asked jurors to vote for a lesser crime, attempted voluntary manslaughter, because he never intended to harm anyone.

Deputy District Attorney Andrew Katz wasn’t having it. “Do not be fooled,” he told jurors. “The defense is giving you a red herring. . . . It’s not the drugs kicking in and telling him to go kill. That’s his nature.”

Katz revealed that Robinson collected books on serial killers, including BTK: Bind, Torture, Kill; chose an online screen identity of “psychokiller666”; belonged to online groups such as “World Famous Serial Killers”; and committed burglaries. (The jury wasn’t told about the rest of his extensive rap sheet.)

“There is substantial evidence that provides a very revealing window into the dark, distorted and dangerous mind of this defendant,” Katz said.

Indeed, Robinson’s MySpace account was a treasure trove of evidence. A homepage image resembling the defendant morphed into the Devil. His online status was set as, “Steven puts a knife right in you.” He listed his interests as “money, drugs, murder, sex, torture and death.” He hailed movies such as Natural Born Killers and American Psycho. He prominently displayed a pentagram.

But it was his pre-stabbing online writings that really put frowns on the faces of jurors. Those statements included:

• “The time for killing is once again at hand! No one is safe. Only your tortured screams will resurrect my dying soul.”

• “I’m gonna stab your ass tonight; that’s what’s up, [expletive] gay boi!”

• “Murder, kill in the name of satanic revolution. Let it begin with you. Kill! Kill and die; leave the signs.”

• And, his most succinct message, six weeks before his stabbing rampage: “Kill, kill, kill.”

Gambale blasted Katz for “maligning” Robinson based on the books he read, the music he played, the movies he liked, “role-playing” messages he sent and the clothes (all black) he hung in his closet. She asked jurors to “protect the scary, protect the weird” and don’t render a verdict “based on fears.”

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Joe Poe 11/05/2009 1:29:00 AM

    At the trial I asked the weighty troll if his interest in torture included BEING TORTURED; he merely glared. I said that if he liked TORTURE, he was gonna LUV prison life! Win/Win!

  • KPR 10/24/2009 2:24:00 AM

    So the movie sent him messages and he would not have committed the crime had those messages not appeared to him. Were that the case, why then was he armed with a hammer and knife prior to viewing the movie? I guess his attorney would argue the 'boy scout' defense...the fat drug abuser was just 'being prepared' in case the movie or perhaps a billboard or cat crossing the street, or some handy excuse gave him a 'message' to kill... The lawyer has the temerity to say she was too scared at the movie theatre after this event, but that the scum should be offered sympathy because the silver screen spoke to him. Both are bums.

  • Scott 10/22/2009 8:42:00 PM

    It appears the Richard ramerizes, Ted Bundy's and Teresa Rathbun's of the world unite.

  • MGD 10/17/2009 8:02:00 AM

    Hey #2, the Constitution protects everybody? Oh, goodie! I'll run over and break the news to my gay neighbors.

  • El Gringo 10/17/2009 1:25:00 AM

    During the past few years I have sat in courtrooms and watched the "action". Only growing grass is slower than "justice". Except when there are public defender cases. I have yet to see a PD enter a plea of Not Guilty for low-income clients. I can understand why some other attorneys refer to them as "Public Pretenders".

  • Geronimo 10/16/2009 8:25:00 AM

    The reason why Public Defenders do not choose their clients is because they believe that everyone accused of a crime is entitled to a defense because the Constitution protects everyone.

  • Andre 10/16/2009 4:09:00 AM

    "He could get life in prison" ... but will probably get probation.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy