Who Killed Tootsie? And Should Her Owner Get Paid for Her Emotional Distress?

Who Killed Tootsie?
And should her bereaved owner get paid for emotional distress? Veterinarians and the pet industry sure hope the answer to the question is ‘no’

Would compensating Tootsie's owner for loss of companionship result in an animal-world Armageddon, as the pet industry claims?
Courtesy Gail McMahon
Would compensating Tootsie's owner for loss of companionship result in an animal-world Armageddon, as the pet industry claims?
Dr. Craig (pictured) says she gave Tootsie excellent care
Courtesy Dr. Diane Craig
Dr. Craig (pictured) says she gave Tootsie excellent care

Related Content

More About

Like this Story?

Sign up for the Weekly Newsletter: Our weekly feature stories, movie reviews, calendar picks and more - minus the newsprint and sent directly to your inbox.

Privacy Policy

The earliest known depictions of the breed of dog known today as the Maltese date back to some 500 years before Christ. These dogs’ characteristics include a miniature size, rounded skulls, dome-shaped noses, striking black eyes and silky white coats. They are popular, especially among women, for their cuddly, playful dispositions.

Tootsie was a pedigree Maltese. Given that she stood less than 10 inches tall and weighed 3.5 pounds, you might not expect her to command respect. But Tootsie was born from the union of show-dog champions and carried herself accordingly. Those who knew her say she was intelligent, quirky, fearless, well-behaved and affectionate.

But Tootsie had health problems: She’d undergone heart surgery as a puppy. Beginning in about 2001, she’d developed laryngeal paralysis, a problem that increasingly worried her owner.

Gail M. McMahon, of Aliso Viejo, spent untold thousands of dollars visiting veterinary clinics in hopes of curing Tootsie’s breathing problem. For years, nothing worked. Then, in late 2004, she learned of Dr. Diane R. Craig. During a consultation, McMahon told the Tustin-based veterinarian of her unique bond with Tootsie. Indeed, she told the vet that Tootsie was the most special dog she’d ever known and of her fear of losing her.

“What I recall is [McMahon] complained that her dog would be happy, happy, happy, jumping around, and then suddenly collapse,” Craig said in an interview. “This happened over and over, and she’d be rushed to an animal hospital.”

The vet recommended corrective throat surgery—tying back one of the dog’s two laryngeal folds. For the next six months, McMahon considered the option. The operation had risks, namely a 20 percent chance of Tootsie catching aspiration pneumonia. After gaining assurances of Craig’s time-tested surgical skills and promises that her beloved, fragile Tootsie would receive high-quality pre- and post-operation care, McMahon took her 6-year-old pet to Craig’s animal hospital on the morning of June 14, 2005.

Just after noon, a heavily sedated Tootsie emerged from the successful two-hour surgery. She was placed in a cage in the back of the hospital to recover. Before the end of the day, Craig called McMahon and said there had been minor post-op complications, but not to worry; the dog would be home in a few days.

But at 12:30 the following morning, a nurse saw fluid—including blood—oozing from the dog’s nose and mouth.

Within hours, Tootsie was dead.

A suspicious McMahon ordered an autopsy. Eventually, she took claims of negligence and a cover-up to Orange County Superior Court. In her view, Tootsie’s killer was the person charged with her safety: Craig.

McMahon’s battle to prove her theory has touched off a flurry of legal briefs between animal-rights groups on one side and veterinary and pet-industry groups on the other, all over a seemingly simple question: If someone kills your beloved pet, can you put a reasonable price tag on your own pain and suffering?

*     *     *

While Tootsie’s death was under legal review in May, a story appeared in The Orange County Register bearing the headline “Tustin Vet Aids Dog’s Recovery From Gunshot.” Craig, the heroine of the article, had operated on and saved Noah, a dog that had been found starving and shot in the face in Riverside County. The Register article—which failed to mention Craig’s role in the ongoing legal battle that had the attention of veterinarians and animal-rights activists nationwide—supplied an Internet link to Craig’s business, Veterinary Surgical Specialists Inc.

Craig’s lawyer, George M. Wallace, said questions about his client’s character are answered on her veterinary website. There, you’ll find Noah’s story is one of the many Craig can tell. She displays pictures of various content-looking dogs she has saved over the years at her state-of-the-art facility, located across Edinger Avenue from the old Marine Corps Air Station hangars.

Craig’s website also demonstrates that she is an animal lover in her personal life. Three cats and a Labrador retriever live with her, her husband (equine surgeon Dr. Richard Pankowski) and their three children. While growing up in San Francisco and the San Fernando Valley, she owned several show dogs and racehorses. She chose a veterinary career after completing degrees at the University of California at Davis and an internship and surgical residency at Cornell University in New York. Craig opened a private veterinary practice in 1988. In 2007, she served as president of the Southern California Veterinary Medical Association.

A brochure titled “When Your Pet Needs Specialized Surgical Care,” tells Craig’s prospective clients, “We care as much about the welfare of your pet as you do.”

Such advertising translated to reality for Tootsie, according to Craig. She said in an interview that the dog received “excellent” care.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next Page >>
 
  • Karen Vaccaro 09/14/2010 2:12:00 AM

    I totally empathize with Gail McMahon! I still dream of my black Cocker Spaniel, Dandy, who's been gone 30 years. I had to give him to my father-in-law, because he bit my 2-yr. old daughter's face when she constantly bothered him while he was eating--Thank God,I was 3 feet away when it happened and was able to pull him off of her, and no serious damage was done to my daughter....BUT, she was my daughter, and he was my 9 yrs. surrogate 'child.' I remember acting the same way Gail McMahon did when it happened--staring, not crying nor angry...just totally depleted, and I still miss my Dandy. In my case, there was a choice of a potentially dangerous attack on my child; but, if not for my child, I would have done anything to keep that dog alive, healthy, and happy!! My friends and family would ask me when I was going away, so they could 'babysit' for Dandy!! Everyone loved him, even my daughter!

  • Mandy 09/12/2009 3:32:00 AM

    I agree, Tootsie's owner should recieve a settlement for all her stress and the death of her dog in the care of the Veterinarian. My beautiful 9 year old chihuahua mix was killed by her vet this past Saturday, September 5th. In a routine check up a slight heart murmur was detected. My pet was in the care of the vet for 10 minutes and they told me she had a heart attack and died during an xray!!! I am mortified and going through tremendous grief right now. My pet was killed. Something needs to be done.

  • Ltpar 09/11/2009 12:39:00 AM

    Our kids are grown and on their own now and my wife has adopted several Chihuahua's. Each has their own personality and each shows their love for us in many ways. Sometimes, I like to kid my wife about them not knowing they are dogs. If an event happened to one of them, like that in this article, we both would be devastated. Don't know whether the Vet did or did exercise proper dilligence in the after surgery care, but I suppose a jury will make that detrmination for us.

  • Nana 09/10/2009 5:08:00 AM

    I agree that there are countless frivolous lawsuits and very likely this is another one of them, but what this highlights is a fundamental lack of accountability and regulation in the vetinary practice. I am sure that there are countless of people that have paid thousands of dollar to end up with a pet that is worse after surgery or treatments, even worse dead. Who does one tell those stories to make change for someone elses pet? I know that I have spent thousands of dollars on a vet visit with one vet to have to put him to sleep by another vet the following week. I think that vets need a level of accountability for quality of care first and foremost. I don�t think we hear half the horror stories of pets that are killed by negligent practices. With regards to emotional distress over the death of a pet, well that is pushing it. I can see the case of where pets were negligently tortured or mutilated in a vet office as grounds for a lawsuit. There has to be a strong line drawn here between medical expenses and emotional distress. How can care get better without these lawsuits without impacting the costs of care to consumers?

  • CHS 09/10/2009 12:22:00 AM

    The vet told us that she could run blood tests and do x-rays to figure out what was wrong with our cat. We decided to go the "budget" route and spend about $30 on medication which has really helped with his breathing problems. Frankly, we need to spend $$$ on our two little kids and not on a cat.

  • HH 09/09/2009 11:12:00 PM

    I wish you would kill comments from stupid people like the fool above.

  • SomeGuy 09/09/2009 8:14:00 PM

    Who Cares about who killed tootsie? Kill this story already! no one cares!

  • chere 09/08/2009 10:08:00 PM

    Geeze Scott, you got more comments on Tootsie than on my dad!! Luv my pets though. I won't be sueing anyone over them. Crazy world we live in.

  • nutjob 09/08/2009 8:48:00 PM

    The most digusting line yet of these comments: "for all intents and purposes, they [dogs] are my kids." To the previous poster: seek help immeidately. Dogs are dogs. Human beings are human beings. They are not similar in any way.

  • Karin 09/06/2009 8:09:00 PM

    I love my dogs, they get the best care, food, play sports, I opted not to have chilren, and for all intents and purposes, they are my kids. That said, this lawsuit is ridiculous. There are enough frivolous lawsuits without bringing a new low into it. I ahve worked at a vet, no vet wnats their patients to die. Tootsie had a congential defect, whats next, sue the breeder? The shelter? I lost my favorite dog last year, best dog I ever had, and I was and at some level still am devasted, lets put it in perspective, it is a dog!

  • chicomex 09/06/2009 6:30:00 AM

    It's stupid idiots like this that back up the court systems and waste our (taxpayers) time and money. This woman obviously has no life (and not just because she's a lawyer either!) and if she is still mourning her dog after 4 years, you know she's a nutcase too! Yes, I love my animals, but they are pets even though they are part of our family. Now if someone maliciously killed one of my pets, I'd probably go after them myself and kick their a$$, but this was something that just happened. That dumb bimbo probably can't get a guy to be with and so she obsessed with a dog. Please lady, go to Condom Revolution and relieve your stress! Your stupid!

  • bobbyc 09/05/2009 11:18:00 PM

    I have been over in that area where Dr. Clark resides. In fact, there are four or five veterinary related businesses all within a 100 yards of that area, and it is VERY confusing if you are trying to find a specific vet over there. Regardless, my dog hurt his back, and I was referred by my local vet, to see a neurologist over by where Dr. Clark resides. Needless to say, I paid $1,500.00 for an MRI, and was then told that my dog needed $3,000.00 spinal surgery ASAP, or he would lose all use of his back legs (mind you this is only one of two veterinary neurologist in all of OC). I decided to forgo the surgery, because my dog was in his senior years, and I didn�t want to put him through such an evasive surgery at his age. After two weeks, my dog fully recovered from his back pain, and has not had any problems what-so-ever for over two and a half years now (he is now 14 years old, and can still run and play). When it comes to any medical issue related to your pet, you FIRST need to do a great deal of research, before you make any rash decisions on major surgery. Like the article says, the veterinary business is a multi-billion dollar one, and like with so many wealthy American businesses today, few have any ethics anymore, and are ALL about the bottom line of making money, regardless of what suffering they put your beloved pet through. Always get a second, and or third opinion, before having any evasive surgery on your pet (if you do care about them). If it�s a life threatening emergency, try and make sure your regular vet is highly trained in all forms of major surgery, and or have a secondary highly trained emergency vet as a option, to your regular vet.

  • Morgan 09/05/2009 8:25:00 PM

    Ms. McMahon's money and time would be spent more wisely if she sought psychological counseling. This women is one sick puppy.

  • vindog 09/05/2009 5:07:00 AM

    An attorney can throw tons of malicious court paperwork at anyone they please, it costs them nothing but hurts the opposing party who has to pay to defend themselves, win or lose. McMahon is this person. If someone said I'd need to spend $6k on my dog for surgery, I'd say no thanks, I'll keep him comfortable until he passes on or put him down. There is a limit to what you should do for an animal whose life is short anyway, and exists solely to make ME happy. Another reality. I love dogs too; I think mine loves me. But insane vetrinary medical procedures, suing for anything under the sun, well that is just stupid. The vet probably should have refused to do the surgery, knowing already that McMahon was a loon, and would be trouble.

  • TheHorror 09/05/2009 2:20:00 AM

    When the word dog and love are used in the same refain, I get a little nervous. How is it that people can love a dog? It's just a little odd and shows how empty these peoples' lives have become. Additionally, I just can't get my mind around the idea that anyone should recover "emotional distress" for the loss of an animal. However, I do agree that you should get the fair market value of the dog.

  • mariposa 09/05/2009 1:39:00 AM

    I'm sure all can agree that McMahon has suffered, as any loving pet owner would. But Tootsie was a lemon. Even if she was "the last female in a champion line," she was a low-grade pet quality purebred, and would never be acceptable for pedigree breeding purposes. McMahon's guilty feelings must come from throwing so much good money after bad. Pedigree does not imply health, or good temperament. Next time, get a pound pup, mutt or pure! It's not like the world is suffering for lack of dogs. But hundreds of thousands of homeless dogs (and cats) are suffering for the purebred "dog fancy" of many owners. Spay/Neuter your pets!

  • imacobru 09/04/2009 8:27:00 PM

    Gail M. McMahon, of Aliso Viejo. Give it up, let it go, get a life.... You have way too much free time. Volunteer to assist evicted Real OC Housewives. Take up a sport like discus or shot-put catching,try Base Jumping but without the parachute or midnight freeway jogging in the Car Pool Lane....no don't do that you'll only screw up someone elses life. Swim to Hawaii....un-assisted.

  • Pamanda 09/04/2009 10:17:00 AM

    I have a miniature dachshund with an overbite, one eye, a gimp leg, nine nipples, and mild to moderate respiratory issues. All of these combined traits just make her who she is. Perhaps if Gail McMahon had let Tootsie live with it's quirky issues instead of insisting on fixing them, the dog would still be alive today. Did she ever stop to think that Tootsie was collapsing because it got so excited that it needed to suddenly take a nap? I mean, that shit happens to my grandmother on a regular basis...

  • CB 09/04/2009 7:32:00 AM

    The blood-sucking lawyer: "Craig never expressly guaranteed the dog would receive excellent care�declarations of excellent services on her veterinary practice�s website were generic and unenforceable" So much for truth in advertising.....

  • Holly 09/04/2009 6:16:00 AM

    I'm sorry but pets are more than simply property to people. I'm not saying they should be equated with children, but they do provide companionship and bring joy into lives. If you dump a table in the trash, no problem, but if you throw a pet in a dumpster you would be charged with animal cruelty. In other aspects of the law animals are regarded as something more than property-- the animal-care industry should not be immune to these laws!

  • really? 09/04/2009 4:52:00 AM

    At first I thought this article was talking about a human being. Then, I thought it was a joke. We are talking about a dog, not a human. Are peoples' lives that empty that they look to dogs for companionship?

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy