Orange's Barrio Cypress Residents Fought the DA's Gang Injunction—and Won (Sort Of)

Uprising
The residents of Barrio Cypress in Orange refused to let the DA’s office slap a gang injunction over their neighborhood without a fight

Yvonne Elizondo (with bullhorn) and Miguel Lara (center) lead the charge at a vigil and protest against the injunction in Orange on April 25
Keith May
Yvonne Elizondo (with bullhorn) and Miguel Lara (center) lead the charge at a vigil and protest against the injunction in Orange on April 25
Lissette Gonzales (with Captain Morgan the dog), her daughter Savanna, Marisol Figueroa, Sergio Vasquez, Emmanuel Gomez and Yvonne Elizondo in front of Emigdio Vasquez's mural, which, according to the Orange P.D., "promotes and glamorizes gang violence"
Keith May
Lissette Gonzales (with Captain Morgan the dog), her daughter Savanna, Marisol Figueroa, Sergio Vasquez, Emmanuel Gomez and Yvonne Elizondo in front of Emigdio Vasquez's mural, which, according to the Orange P.D., "promotes and glamorizes gang violence"

At about 7:30 on the cool morning of Feb. 23, Emmanuel Gomez arrived on the doorstep of Yvonne Elizondo’s office on Batavia Street in Orange. The shy, baby-faced high-school sophomore with a habit of dressing in collared shirts and pressed slacks didn’t know where else to go. He clutched a 6-inch-thick stack of documents under his arm and sat on the curb.

Before sunrise that day, police had jolted him awake with whacks on his front door. A pulse-pounding commotion had followed, with blinding flashlights and a din of deep voices. His name was called out, and then the daunting packet was dropped into his hands. His mom was crying. She was asked to sign something; Gomez told her not to sign anything.

Elizondo arrived at her office around 8:30 that morning. The community activist remembers that Gomez was groggy, frustrated and “all pissed-off.” She wondered what the cops wanted with him: soft-spoken, hard-working, gang-tattoo-free, with no violent criminal convictions on his record. He had a few misdemeanor charges from when he was younger, but those were dealt with. He wasn’t on probation; he’d made the honor roll in his alternative-education program and often talked with Elizondo, his case manager at the Bridge—the non-profit she works for that serves at-risk, low-income young people—about his dreams of becoming an engineer.

“Then the rest of them started trickling in,” says Elizondo. “They were confused and asking, ‘What is this?’”

Soon, the small conference room was crowded with teens and parents, all clasping the same fat packets, telling of similar SWAT-team scenarios and pleading with her for an explanation.

More than 100 people received that same rude awakening that morning from teams of gang-unit specialists, police officers, sheriff’s deputies and district attorneys. The preliminary injunction against the Orange Varrio Cypress (OVC) gang had been served.

Law-enforcement gang units and the DA’s office say that when serving these special lawsuits, they plow in like they’re doing a drug bust because the defendants are people whom they’ve determined to be active, potentially violent, criminal gang members. The goal is to surprise them with the suit, lest they plan any retaliatory attacks, skip town or, worse, reach for a weapon.

In this case, many instead reached for Yvonne Elizondo. Part den mother, part feisty provocateur, Elizondo came of age in Orange in the 1970s and has a long track record of youth advocacy and outreach.

Flummoxed, Elizondo leafed through the packets—and then looked into the pleading faces, many of them Bridge regulars whom she often affectionately refers to as “my kids,” “my girls” or “my guys,” and delivered the bad news.

“I said, ‘Well, as far as I can tell, they’re suing you guys,’” she says. “They said, ‘For what? We ain’t got no money.’ I said, ‘No, no. What they’re trying to do is they’re trying to put you on a gang injunction.’ They said, ‘What’s a gang injunction?’”

Everyone spoke at once. She felt like she’d been kicked in the stomach: She knew many of their stories intimately—how they’d busted their butts to go back to school, get their degrees, beat their addictions, volunteer, secure full-time jobs, turn their lives around.

“You know they’re doing well, you know they’re going to school, you know they’re going to college, you know they want to change their lives, and they say, ‘God, Yvonne, see? Now we can’t do it,’” she says. “And this is why.”

Elizondo knew these people. She knew that Erika Aranda, a young single mom who had frequented the Bridge, had never been convicted of a crime. Aranda had an uncle who had once been involved with the gang, and she knew some kids in the neighborhood whom the Orange Police Department alleges are gang members; those were the reasons given in the court documents for why Aranda was deemed a gang member.

She knew that the three De Herrera brothers—who are in their 30s and 40s—were too busy taking care of their ailing parents and their young kids, as well as volunteering at a local boxing gym and at church, to be participating in gang activity. She knew Gomez was on top of his homework and grades and that Miguel Lara worked full-time to help his mom and was excited about attending Santiago Community College. There were dozens more like them: people she worked with directly or had known for decades whom she knew were not actively leading criminal gang lives and terrorizing residents, as the lawsuit alleged.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next Page >>
 
  • Sonof Muralist 11/05/2010 3:55:00 AM

    My father painted that mural and i can remember helping him varnishing it as a kid. His work reflects a time gone bye, a time in his life when youngsters dressed up had pride not down like today the thugs in under garments and tattoos. Nothing on that mural that represents the ills of these small time gang members"The bald heads" the one whom perpetrate genocide on there own brethren. However I do not share Yvonne Elizondo politics. During the 80's the gangs became dangerous that Orange created a task force to root out the fatherless criminal because stray bullets were flying. I am out raged that Yvonne and the ACLU would try to pay for my dad to testify. Don't believe what you hear from these Mexican centrist activist. There is very little OG peoples from that hood.Someone needs to write a balanced story about this situation. I think there is a shakedown via the ACLU.

  • yoko@yahoo.com 02/28/2010 9:15:00 AM

    fuck mierda street!...

  • Mexican-American 11/29/2009 9:00:00 AM

    Ed Harrison, you are %100 right. Screw these people! I am Mexican-American and I get harassed all the time but I don't mind. The reason all these people are complaining is because they are up to no good. I, for one, am glad I have to deal with the harassment because I know that the enemies of civilization and peace are being thrown into the trash bin where they belong. To all the peace officers out there who read this, keep up the good work. God speed, god speed.

  • Ed Harrison 06/21/2009 4:04:00 AM

    WE HAVE THE GANG INJUNCTION HERE IN SAN MARCOS, CA. It is a great thing, I believe the government should go one step further and issue gang hunting permits, that allows any citizen the right to shoot on sight these little scumbags in our communities.

  • junior 06/04/2009 8:35:00 AM

    the gang unit r stupid they want every thing there way yeah we know we fuck up but they cross tha line this time not only in ovc but in santa ana costa mesa aint that some shit so i say fuck that fuck da g unit

  • Jenn 06/03/2009 1:28:00 AM

    To Reality: Why don't you READ the article?? Non gang members/GOOD CITIZENS are getting slapped in the face with these injunctions!

  • tired 06/02/2009 8:51:00 PM

    I pray that there will be a gang injuction in my neighborhood. i can't take living with all the scum anymore! sapd, if you're listening, i live on first and euclid in santa ana.

  • reality 06/02/2009 5:35:00 AM

    Protesting against a gang injunction? Ridiculous. Go cry me a river. What a waste of time. Why even write an article about it? You people are savages, that's why you are getting slapped with this injunction. If you were decent citizens that contributed to society, this would not happen to you.

  • Ale 05/30/2009 3:00:00 AM

    I have spoken to residents affected by the injunction in SJC. Not gang members, but hard working people, who have been included in the injunction for having a relative who IS a gang member (just one of the many examples of how truly innocent people get caught up in this). Cousins who can't talk to one another, even though neither is a gang member. This injunction in SJC IS a nightmare for the residents IN Las Villas and other predominantly Latino neighborhoods in SJC. Make no mistake, the more affluent (dare I say, predominantly Non-Latino?)neighborhoods love the injunction, "Daffy's dumb" from OC. You know why? They don't want Latinos living in "their" quant little SJC. San JUAN Capistrano. NOT Saint John, mind you. Were you there, at the City Council meeting last year, when the renewal for the Family Resource Center CHEC was discussed? No? Let me tell you. No, let me enlighten you. Some of the things some residents said would've made Jesus Christ himself angry. Mothers complaining that they were afraid of allowing their children walk along side Latino mothers walking with THEIR brown children. Nothing to do with the Family Resource Center (FRC). They just wanted to complain that there are "too many Latinos (I decided to use a more PC term that was used by them) in SJC". The meeting was about the FRC, not about illegal immigration, as so many of the opposition tried to impose onto the council's discussion. Didn't help their cause that Gilchrist was there in person. I dare you to take a walk INSIDE the neighborhoods included in the injunction in SJC, talk to the people there. Ask THEM how the injunction was served, how accessible legal counsel was made available to them (isn't this country's legal system BASED on Innocent BEFORE proven Guilty?) You can respond to my comment AFTER you've done your homework. Correctly this time. Because I don't know who you spoke with that claim this injunction is pure heaven to them, but I sure know you didn't talk to anyone inside the neighborhoods included in the injunction.

  • Andy Anaheim 05/30/2009 2:55:00 AM

    Notice how the Sophomore in high school had previous convictions, but that was "when he was younger"... as if it was so long ago.

  • Maira 05/30/2009 12:39:00 AM

    It is not fair what the DA's office tried to accomplish in the city of Orange. If they had valid proof, then why didn't they go ahead and come fourth with it. Because they knew that it was not going to hold up in court. Thankfully things went the way that they did and most of the cases were dismissed.

  • CHS 05/30/2009 12:13:00 AM

    If these gang members are criminals, then why not just arrest them for the crimes they've committed? Oh, I almost forgot...these gang injunctions make the DA and the cops look like they're fighting crime.

  • BrunoHockalugie 05/29/2009 8:03:00 PM

    I applaud Daffy for her non-biased, anti-crime article. Nothing makes more upset than when communities try to fight the gangs members that take their neighborhood hostage. We need to be more like LA and see gang members as "victims" and allow them to conduct their business like any other hard working American. And the cops MUST be racist because it seems that every gang member they arrest is Mexican, errr "Latino". "LA RAZA", eh Daffy?

  • Bridget 05/29/2009 10:53:00 AM

    To the commenter above - I've spoken with a handful of the kids who have been arrested and they are NOT gang members, not even close....so opposite that its laughable...so YES they are heroes for trying to fight for justice to clear the name of these kids whose permanent records shouldn't be tainted by racist policies. Gang injunctions are not heaven for the neighborhoods, because the people who live in the neighborhoods are PART of the injunctions. The affluent people you speak of who are for the injunctions live miles away from any of these neighborhoods. I'd suggest some people take half as much time as Daffodil did to research/actually talk to the people who are directly involved, and not just rely on hearsay from affluent communities, like the commenter above is suggesting.

  • Daffy's dumb 05/29/2009 10:35:00 AM

    Seriously Daffy, you've got to write a novel. Way to play up the drama, but are SURE the heroes of your story are really heroes? Do you believe everything they tell you? By the way, the horrors of the SJC injunction are pure heaven to the residents, or so I've heard. You might want to speak to more than a few gang members before putting your stories to bed.

  • Ira mullen 05/29/2009 4:29:00 AM

    Wednesday, May 27, 2009 Boy stabbed twice during confrontation with rival gang Six people were arrested following the stabbing in Orange, police said. By DENISSE SALAZAR The Orange County Register Comments 82 | Recommend 3 ORANGE � A boy was stabbed twice during a confrontation with a rival gang, police said. The attack occurred at 3:41 p.m. when the juvenile was walking north on Glassell Street at Everett Place and was confronted by a group of rival gang members, said Orange police Sgt. Dan Adams. Based on the investigation, three juveniles got out of a car and confronted the victim who was then kicked, punched and stabbed in the arm and back Friday, Adams said. The victim, whose identity is not being revealed because he is a minor, was taken to a hospital, treated for his injuries and released Friday night. The three suspects were arrested Friday evening a short distance from where the attack occurred. Three others who waited in the vehicle during the attack were later arrested. All of the suspects are minors, except for 19-year-old Galdino Derosas, who is being held at the Orange County Jail on suspicion of attempted murder. He is being held on $500,000 bail. The juveniles were taken to the Orange County Juvenile Hall on suspicion of attempted murder. The victim and the suspects are part of two rival gangs that each have a court injunction against them. The injunctions curtail activity of members, forbidding them to loiter or associate with each other, wear gang-affiliated clothes or stay out past a court-ordered curfew. --From the Reg . Umm, great reporting, Daffy. Viva la causa and all that.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy