The Lawsuit Against the Husband of Assemblywoman Diane Harkey Has Generated an Internet Shitstorm

Fecal Wrangling
The lawsuit against the husband of Assemblywoman Diane Harkey has generated an Internet shitstorm

Dan Harkey, husband of state Assemblywoman Diane Harkey, has a term for the lawsuits, government investigations and bad press directed toward him and his company, Point Center Financial.

“I look at this as a 90-day flurry of bullshit,” he says over the phone. “It’s all designed to embarrass Diane.”

Faced with accusations of running a Ponzi scheme and an inquiry from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Harkey has taken to defending himself in the realm where, traditionally, bullshit flurries most freely: the Internet. In the past month, Harkey has launched two websites: One is designed to refute the accusations against his company, while the other smears the guy who, he says, stirred up all this trouble in the first place.

That guy is retired lawyer Lloyd Charton, a Dana Point neighbor of the Harkeys who invested with Aliso Viejo-based Point Center Financial. His name is the first among more than 50 plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed in November 2008 against Point Center and the Harkeys. He’s also the star of LloydChartonInvestigation.com, which Harkey started in early March. Expulsion from the grand jury. Toothpaste theft. DUI probation. A police report documenting foul language and immature actions toward a neighbor. All these things, culled from Harkey’s public-records search into Charton’s past, are posted for download on the website with supposedly explanatory captions.

Not-so-prominently placed are the circumstances or the time lines for any of these things. Charton was on the grand jury in the early 1970s; the downloadable document shows that he wasn’t expelled, as the website suggests, but rather excluded from some proceedings due to a policy violation. Two anonymous contributors have posted items saying Charton was kicked out of Santa Ana Country Club for filching toiletries; Charton says he doesn’t know what they’re referring to, while Harkey admits those items are “not verifiable.” The DUI, however, was real, and Charton says he regrets it happened—which it did in 1999.

“It’s a silly attempt by Dan Harkey to post negative things about me in an attempt to deflect the scam that he pulled,” Charton says about LloydChartonInvestigation.com. “I doubt there’s anyone who has reached the age of 62 without the occasional dispute with a neighbor or an occasional drunk-driving 10 years ago. So what? Who gives a shit? [Harkey’s] making a fool of himself. The effort he should be making is to explain the failed loans and the fraud.”

The anti-Charton website is another volley in a war of words between Harkey and the people who say he scammed them. In the gated community of Ritz Cove—hemmed in by a golf course, the Ritz-Carlton resort, Pacific Coast Highway and Salt Creek Beach—Charton and the Harkeys live a few doors down from each other. That’s how they met, and, Charton says, that’s partly why he trusted Harkey with $1.23 million of his money.

“He befriended me,” Charton says. “I found him quite charming, likable, gracious, friendly.”

The warm feelings even led Charton, a Democrat, to contribute $1,000 to Republican Diane Harkey’s losing 2006 bid for the state Senate. But in the same year, Charton says he became aware that some of the loans Point Center had been making to developers were likely to fail. So he asked Harkey to let him out of the investment pool.

Snippets of the resulting e-mail chain are now posted on LloydChartonInvestigation.com, presented to bolster the argument that Charton demanded preferential treatment and has been planning all along to drag Harkey into litigation and take control of the company. Charton says he was simply the first one to sound the alarm about Harkey’s business, which Harkey told the Los Angeles Times has seen about 60 percent of its loans default. (Harkey will no longer comment on the percentage of failed loans.) Any sane person who realized his or her money was invested in a sham company would ask for an out, too, Charton says.

There are 148 pages in the complaint filed by Charton and others in Orange County Superior Court. The suit is packed with tales of loans designed to fail, company-owned investment property left to blight and an advertising campaign that discounted the riskiness of the hard-money loans issued by Point Center Financial. And it’s all posted on Charton’s own website: PointCenterInvestigation.com. While its name is mimicked by Harkey’s anti-Charton online venture, the content differs. Charton’s site contains links to coverage of the suit and other media reports supporting the claims against the company—and few personal mentions of Harkey’s past.

But both “investigation” sites capitalize on the power of blameless Web-based gossip by allowing visitors to anonymously contribute. Charton’s site allows users to “vote” to remove Harkey from control of their investments; Charton claims that more than 300 investors have done so. And Harkey’s website has bred a cottage industry of Point Center employees and investors annoyed by Charton’s pot-stirring and allegedly domineering personality. Harkey says his IT staffer edits out profanity, but nothing else. One commenter sneers, “I am very familiar with Lloyd and his ‘above the pheasants’ [sic] attitude.”

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • LC 11/29/2009 1:29:00 PM

    Dear Fellow Point Center Investors, My name is Lloyd Charton. I am an investor with Point Center. Dan Harkey was my friend and neighbor. He remains my neighbor. I retired in 2003 from nearly 30 years as a litigator, and soon thereafter Mr. Harkey asked me to invest money with him. I found him to be very convincing and listened to him attentively. We had many discussions in my home and his, and attended social events including dinners and parties. He charmed my socks off. He said he would be my loan manager and I could trust him to do all the due diligence necessary to protect my investment. He said he had a very experienced underwriting team. He described a �very safe, well diversified lending program for first trust deeds on commercial real estate.� Isn�t this what he told you as well? It turns out that a comprehensive, professional review of the underwriting and loan files reveals he did virtually no due diligence at all. He called this program the �National Financial Lending Pool� (or NFL), and said he had been doing this for 30 years. It turns out that Mr. Harkey began this business model in 2002 and seriously altered it in 2004 to a new model without the critical diversification clause. It began to fail very quickly and was so disastrous that by 2007 Mr. Harkey would not honor requests for redemption of shares. Mr. Harkey has blamed the demise of his business on the economy. Not so. A large group of us have filed an action in Orange County Superior Court and in connection with the action have just conducted an extensive review of the NFL Pool, based on records dating back to 2004, and its 16 largest loans. We have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars of our own money and thousands of hours to uncover what happened at Point Center. All the investors need to know what really caused the huge losses. We have used forensic accountants, underwriters, land development consultants and other experts. Although we requested to see the complete loan files, which we had every right to review, Mr. Harkey refused until he was sued. Mr. Harkey has sent letters saying he voluntarily produced these files upon request. Not so. We could not review these documents until we sued Point Center. Mr. Harkey seems to have little regard for the truth. Sadly, it�s as simple as that. Here is what we have unearthed in connection with the investigation and what we believe will be revealed in court. It appears that over 80% of the money loaned by Point Center�s NFL Pool since 2004, (at the height of our real estate boom) was never paid back by the borrowers. Mr. Harkey used roll-over (sometimes called Ponzi-style lending) techniques to stall the inevitable collapse of his �scheme.� He would take a loan the borrower could not pay back, increase the size of it by obtaining a new, much higher appraisal and bring in new money to replace the old. It appears he used impounded payments from our invested funds to make distributions to us, essentially giving our own money back to us. As a result, we all thought the borrowers were doing fine. They were not. Mr. Harkey did not diversify the lending on the 200 million dollars entrusted to him for the NFL Pool as promised. Instead, he plunged the vast majority into raw land development on residential housing. By and large this highly speculative loan type was on desert raw land, which was not entitled and not permitted, or on other highly speculative ventures. The borrowers had yet to go through the risky environmental impact reports and lengthy entitlement process. Virtually none of these projects have been paid off by borrowers or been completed as promised. Mr. Harkey has viciously attacked me with fabrication and innuendo because I sent communications to other investors, and had the audacity to ask to review the loan files on his failed loan, which are the majority of the loans made (by dollars invested) with our money. Mr. Harkey says I want to take over management. Not so. Again he fabricates this out of thin air. I have never asked to be anyone�s manager and do not want that task. Mr. Harkey became very rich by taking tens of millions of dollars for himself, or the entities he controls, as fees and commissions on these failed loans. Mr. Harkey has not been a very good fiduciary at all. On the management side of things Mr. Harkey has set new records for keeping his investors in the dark while he does very little to improve the properties or report on their status. He has been sued in multiple jurisdictions for fraud, misrepresentation, racketeering, etc. He continues to accrue huge management fees against our assets while doing little to help us. He refuses to comply with standard reporting requirements for his investors. He doesn�t tell us which properties have huge outstanding tax liabilities. He won�t inform us of the status of the entitlement process on our large REO properties. We have been sued by borrowers and cities. He won�t even tell us what the properties are worth in this market. He needs to be replaced. You might consider not allowing him to bully you or deflect the real facts by blaming the whistleblower, which is, yes - me -I�m proud to say. You can learn more by going to www.pointcenterinvestigation.com -and you can reply to this communication by sending me an email at pointcenterinvestigation@yahoo.com You will not find non-related, personal attacks. You will find out what happened to your money. Sincerely, Lloyd Charton

  • Santina Meath 04/10/2009 1:07:00 AM

    If this "company" is so reputable, why don't they pay the fines owed to the City of Palm Springs. Why have they left the owners at the Palm Springs Country Club with a field that is so retched, wild flowers won't even grow on it. This child-like name calling is ridiculous. Grow up people!!

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy