-
Debby Bodkin 04/10/2010 9:06:00 AM
The Orange County Sheriff has the duty to act in the interests of justice and the public's safety. Since my letters requesting information about the felony gun possession for R.J. Hemenway, the son of the former principal at Santa Margarita Catholic HS, have been ignored by the OC District, the OC Sheriff, and the OC Board of Supervisors, I thought maybe Sheriff Hutchens would have the integrity to at least respond to multiple potential corruption crime reports surrounding the felony gun charge dismissal by OCSC Judge Robert Fitzgerald and illegal business and employment practices continuing in religious institutions. I WAS WRONG!
In my opinion, Sheriff Hutchens has no business running for re-election when she cannot stop campaigning long enough to understand the need to respond to MULTIPLE letters from members of the public, letters involving failures to protect children from a repeat Columbine HS tragedy and as we have all witnessed, sex crimes committed by employees employed by the Diocese of Orange, and ongoing legal conflicts of interest violations committed by the attorneys and law firms representing the OC Sheriff's Department.
If the OC District Attorney, former OC Sheriff Mike Carona and the OC Board of Supervisors paid more attention to the citizens they have been elected to serve, Orange County, California would be a safer place to live and work. Since the latest appellate court ruling in the Lyle Wilson wrongful termination lawsuit will probably cost Orange County taxpayers $1 million plus, and the attorneys' fees to defend ultiple lawsuits still pending against the OC Sheriff's Department, Orange County is NOT a safe place to live, work or raise children. Why? Just check out public criminal and civil court records at www.occourts.org.... they show many mismanaged and unfair court proceedings that cater only to the rich and famous politically-connected attorneys and law firms.
Hutchens has the chance to make a difference -- and she has failed. Whether any other candidate can make a difference, I hope so, but will not place any bets on any type of reform in the future.
-
Ed 04/02/2010 8:05:00 AM
Sheriff Hutchens who have you turned out to be?
(1) the king-sheet cop who doesn't want anyone else carrying a gun?
(2) the shrewd agenda cop who wants to grow the idea that the people should rely solely on the sheriff's department for their personal protection (never the mandate of law enforcement and physically impossible, but do you expect it will cause us to fund your department out of desperation)?
(3) the liberal politico-cop, who would wrap her arms around the families of victims of street crime for the next press photo opp?.
(4) the defiant, insulated-within-the-fortress cop, who would start pointless wars with the OC Board of Sup's, instead of working on the county's biz with them?
Why the war on CCW bearers? Unless they became criminals in the interim or flunked their last range re-qual's, don't fix a non-existant problem. How many of us out here have obtained NV or AZ CCW's? : quick NCIC check, basic background, rec'd one week later in the mail, conscious law-abiding citizens thereafter, with greater appreciation for the work you and your deputies do. Last I heard, not one heinious murderer among us. Aside from the nonspecific and vague phobias of the timid or leftist revolutionary insane (who probably also file absurd complaints against your deputies), what's the problem?
Drop the L.A. agenda - please BE the good Sheriff of ORANGE COUNTY, California.
-
joel 04/01/2009 10:02:00 PM
A great photo of the "cop" on the March 27 cover. I hadn't thought about the Village People for years!
-
Chas. Brown 03/31/2009 6:29:00 AM
The sheriff should not drive herself. Neither should any sheriff in this state, for that matter. She needs to be in touch at all times with her command staff, her communications division, and other first responders.
Recoiling from the "posse" that traveled with her predecessor, Sheriff Hutchens has gone too far the other way, like Jimmy Carter carrying his own suitcase. But she needs to recognize what is and is not an effective use of an executive's time.
As to carry permits, if anyone in the OC can document multiple threats on his life, it should be Mike Schroeder! I mean, the man is very far from universally popular.
I predict that Schroeder will loose his court challenge to the sheriff pulling his CCW permit, because, for all the 'wingers' huffing and puffing, the szheriff's interpretation of the law is correct.
However, he will take revenge by masterminding the election of yet another far right hack to the post Sheriff Hutchens now holds. Chief Paul Walters may not be malleable enough.
The clue for us outsiders will be if Schroeder backs Walters for the job. If he does, we will know that the Santa Ana chief has sold the last shreds of his soul. If he does not, The OC Weekly will have a lot of fun with Schroeder's candidate of choice.
-
Mike Nunn 03/31/2009 2:12:00 AM
I find this lady to be a breath of fresh air for the county. I retired as a Dept. Dist Atty. of Orange County many years ago. The Republicans of the County will most likely eat her alive but I do like her. Particularly the recall of the gun permits. There is no need for all those guns on the streets.
-
DRE DAWG 03/31/2009 12:30:00 AM
If she's pissing off Corona Cronies, she's definitely doing something right!
The CCW and Supe Snoop is a ploy (by power-hungry, threatened, out of touch Republicans) to divert public attention. Norby says, "She didn�t have to do it. Why bother things? No harm, no foul, right?" This is the kind of attitude that kept Corona's blatantly illegal activities under the radar for so long. Thank god for Norby being termed out!!!
I don't care what political party she's with or switched from, she's gotta do something about the Orange County Jail system ASAP!!!
-
Ltpar 03/30/2009 11:48:00 PM
Ron, actually Santa Ana is known for a few more things than you listed. It is known among law enforcement circles as having a progressive and professional Police Department. From your comments, you appear to be an honest, patriotic American who gives back to his community. The only question I have for you is, why do you need a CCW permit and do you meet the "Cause" standard defined by the California Attorney General? If you meet the "Cause" standard, by all means you should get a permit and the Sheriffs Department would likely grant you one.
Apparently some readers are not paying attention, because as I understand it, 400 permits have not been revoked. I believe letters were sent to a number of questionable permit holders, asking that they communicate with the Sheriffs Department and demonstrate the "Cause" required by law. Many of these people failed to respond and as such, a few permits have been terminated. Perhaps the others will now become more motivated, that is if they have "Cause."
Bottom line here is, when you see who had their permits suspended, the logic of the review process becomes clear. It also makes one wonder, how many other people like that are running around Orange County carrying a gun?
-
Ron 03/30/2009 11:14:00 PM
Ok, let me see if I have this straight: I live in Santa Ana (a city known mainly for two things-- crime & illegals). I'm ex-military (Honorably Discharged, which is more than ex-Sheriff Corona can say) with more firearms experience and training than most Police/Sheriffs and I'm willing to bet Sheriff Hutchens. Other than a few traffic tickets, I have no record. I've also organized and taught a rape awareness/self-defense course here in Orange County. Yet, if I applied for a Concealed Weapons Permit, Sheriff Hutchens would employ typical cop paranoia and fear and deny my request.
Yea, she's the one I really want holstering a gun.
Oh, by the way, I wonder if the torture and mis-treatment of prisoners (human beings) is still common practice in her jail.
-
thom barney 03/30/2009 8:38:00 PM
THERE is still a long, long, LONG ways to go for the department and Orange County to go before overcomming what was universaly known as "AMERICA'S DIRTIEST [cop shop] SHERIFF!"
It will not happen in months, it will be at least years, if not decades.............and, realistically, there could have been a lot more in the way of charges to the former Chief and individuals within the Department......but, with their 'tactics of fear and repression', which in some ways exist still, and are happening to some who opposed the administration lead by mike 'the little sheriff' corona...
'if', and 'when' these tactics change, when the harrasment of those who complained stops, that is when the HEALING WILL BEGIN....until such a time everything to us who live[and lived] with this harrasment, and all we lost because of it, are now and forever the real issues and all talk is just that.....'so much talk' when there can safely be complaints about crimes and missconduct by officers in this department...without fear of retaliation....then that will be progress.............YOU ARE NOT THERE YET.and there are those of us who know this well.sincerely, thom barney
former OC resident
-
Ltpar 03/28/2009 4:45:00 PM
Scott, good article on Sheriff Hutchens. I have met her a couple of times and my opinion is that she is a top professional. The personal touch of puting a face on a high profile law enforcement official was well taken.
Pardon me if I don't have a lot of sympathy for the whining of the friends of Mike Carona who are getting their CCW permits pulled. Seems as I recall, that was an issue in his trial and everyone was saying something should be done about it. Along comes the new Sheriff who tries to fix that problem and the political cronies don't like it.
While being a strong supporter of the 2nd Amendment, I believe the Sheriff is correct in her interpretation of the law on gun permits. If a person is in a position where they need a CCW permit and can show cause, by all means give it to them. For the rest, try golf to pump up your egos.
Come election time in 2010, the radical gun enthusiasts, women haters, a few Republican misfits, and people who never supported Hutchens in the first place, will become a vocal minority, running around waving at windmills. The responsible voters will evaluate the performance of the Sheriffs Department on a number of fronts and decide if this is the kind of leadership we want. I am confident that when all is said and done, Sandra Hutchens will be elected by a substantial majority.
-
Irvine's Finest 03/28/2009 3:31:00 AM
If Larry Agran's tool Adam Probolsky is out to get Sheriff Hutchens, she can have my vote any time.
-
Bob 03/28/2009 3:17:00 AM
Hey Spastic Gary, no one said people with CCW permits commit more crimes than people without. I don't even know how your feeble mind extracted that from what I said. What I was talking about is the FACT that the now convicted Felon Mike Carona gave some of those permits to campaign contributors. That is a fact that is not in dispute. I have no problem with people having guns at all, but I want the process to be equal for everyone. Now, if the Sheriff feels it is necessary to start over in order to weed out those who did not properly meet the requirements, than why would any law abiding citizen have a problem with that. It seems to me that some of you gun rights activists minds are a little clouded with gun powder. Do you really want Michael Schroeder, and idiotic, angry, impulsive dumbass carrying a gun. What if you cross paths with that nutcase and he decides to shoot you? You know what's going to happen to him??? Nothing at all because he's connected to the GOP and his wife, Susan Cunt Schroeder is the corrupt mouthpiece of the DA's office. I'm glad they took his gun away and I'm glad the Sheriff decided she was not going to be anyone's puppet. You know darn well that is why the GOP told certain people on the Board to appoint her. They thought they were going to get someone they could control and to their surprise it diddn't happen. I will say this though, I really don't want her to get re-elected. I do think she has brought an LA mentality to the OC and I really don't like it. Instead of promoting some good people from within the department who deserved to advance, she brought in two idiots from LA. Hillman is the worst. They don't call him Hurricane Hillman because they like him. I know that for a fact. It is not a term of endearment. The line staff in the department think he's a nutcase. In any event, try not to stab everyone man, woman and child who may be on your side. just because I want there to be some checks and balances doesn't mean I want to disarm the public. I would actually prefer that the good peope of this community did carry firearms. But, I don't want assholes like Schroeder carrying them.
-
NH 03/27/2009 10:36:00 PM
"[Hutchens] pauses, mentions that [the Orange County Register] refused to publish a letter from her (an accusation that, I later learned, was mistaken)..."
That is a succinct summary of what's been going on since she was appointed. Question is...WAS she truly mistaken, or was she trying to mislead?
Did she mislead the BOS about her CCW stance during interviews before her appointment?
Is she misleading Orange County citizens in painting the CCW holders and the PSRs with the Carona Crony brush?
Was she misleading us by saying that security reasons (undercover officers' identities and meeting room blind spots) were her "good cause" for not releasing the uneditted video of the BOS meeting.
Is she mistaken in believing that these issues won't matter, or will be forgotten?
-
Abe 03/27/2009 10:15:00 PM
The current Sheriff is TWICE as corrupt as Carona ever was. She should do us all a favor and resign now.
-
Jack 03/27/2009 9:56:00 PM
Hutchens is an embarrassment to our county!!! She needs to move on!!! She brings Gestapo policing to a county that does not deserve such treatment!!!!
-
Jeremy 03/27/2009 9:10:00 PM
Sheriff Hutchens took an issue that was running quite well and re-politicized it. I'm referring to the CCW issue. Under Sheriff Carona, if you met some objective criteria for good cause, you passed a background check, you took approved training, you got a CCW. It didn't matter if you were a campaign donor or not. Everyone applying got the same treatment. I believe that I read recently that about 50-60 people that were campaign donors got a CCW from Carona.
About 400 people are getting their CCW licenses revoked or "voluntarily" having to turn their CCW licenses in because they did nothing wrong to warrant this action. This is purely because the Appointed Sheriff decided that she wants to change the policy and revoke all those licenses that do not meet her new standard.
Sheriff Hutchens has an extremely BROAD authority to issue these licenses. She chooses to "follow the law" and choose a restrictive policy. That's perfectly legal. Sheriffs that choose to issue these licenses for "personal protection" are also following the law. There's nothing in the law or in any biding opinion from an Attorney General that defines specifically what "good cause" is.
Where things get interesting is that the ability to revoke a license is more restricted. Doing what she's doing possibly constitutes a breach of contract for 400+ people because Sheriff Hutchens has decided to change the rules.
She isn't trying to confiscate anyone's guns. That's obvious to me. She's been flailing about trying to find a legal way to follow her own personal agenda. If there was a clearly legal way to do what she intends to do, it would have probably been done by now.
In a Board of Supervisor's meeting back in January, Sheriff Hutchens brought a lot of plainclothed Deputies to that meeting under the guise of providing added security for that meeting. Plainclothed is NOT "undercover". Several people were brought aside by Deputies after they'd been in the meeting room. That's a really poor way of "securing" a meeting place... seek out the specific individuals after they enter an area instead of screening everyone on the way in. There is only one way that can be viewed: intimidation.
She lied to the board about the security tape. She said that the video of Supervisor Norby's notes was too blurry to read. Well, it's obvious by the video clip that you can read those notes. She lied during her interview with the supervisors. She indicated that she thought the CCW program was basically working well. She revamped it. Big time.
I'm from way up north and even I know that Sheriff Hutchens hasn't really done anything notable except to get a lot of people upset at her. She is making headlines in an unfavorable way. She's losing key political support from all over Orange County, if I'm reading the article correctly. If she wins her upcoming election, it'll be one heck of a miracle with the way she's going.
Unless she does something grossly bad while in office, I doubt she could be held personally liable for her actions. That means that she's playing with YOUR money, good citizens of Orange County. If her Department gets money from the State, that means she's also playing with MY money too. With little accountability until November 2010.
-
Redspike 03/27/2009 8:39:00 PM
"Hutchens says, �I find here in the county . . . well, we Republicans have a tendency to eat our own.�"
LIAR! Hutchens was a registered DEMOCRAT until just before she started looking into the Sheriff position!!! The proof is out there!
Article was very long, so it's hard to pinpoint specific issues, but note the article, and the Sheriff herself, fail to point out that only a very small handful of the permits issued were to Carona "Cronies". She hangs her hat on this new good cause standard (does that make the Sheriff's who issue much more freely in other counties such as Kern, San Berdo, Fresno, etc, law breakers?) she has concocted, and when that fails to be supported by real facts, she likes to point to Carona and his alleged issuance of permits to campaign donors, of course, conveniently omitting that there are only a few of these out there. Had she had any real OC street smarts, she would have just revoked those very few permits connected directly with Carona and avoided this mess she created.
The good news is, we have an election coming up, and I know where my donatinon dollars already went. And they did not go to any Dana Point resident.
-
Redspike 03/27/2009 8:38:00 PM
"Hutchens says, �I find here in the county . . . well, we Republicans have a tendency to eat our own.�"
LIAR! Hutchens was a registered DEMOCRAT until just before she started looking into the Sheriff position!!! The proof is out there!
Article was very long, so it's hard to pinpoint specific issues, but note the article, and the Sheriff herself, fail to point out that only a very small handful of the permits issued were to Carona "Cronies". She hangs her hat on this new good cause standard (does that make the Sheriff's who issue much more freely in other counties such as Kern, San Berdo, Fresno, etc, law breakers?) she has concocted, and when that fails to be supported by real facts, she likes to point to Carona and his alleged issuance of permits to campaign donors, of course, conveniently omitting that there are only a few of these out there. Had she had any real OC street smarts, she would have just revoked those very few permits connected directly with Carona and avoided this mess she created.
The good news is, we have an election coming up, and I know where my donatinon dollars already went. And they did not go to any Dana Point resident.
-
Gary 03/27/2009 7:54:00 PM
OK, Bob. If you're going to state something as fact, give evidence of "...questionable activity..., or, this only repeats heresay and shows ignorance on the issue. What evidence do you have of questionable CCW activities? Do people with CCW's commit more crime than unarmed citizens. Show us the stats.
What is questionable in my opinion, is a sheriff who revokes a CCW permit without cause.
Here is a portion of CA Penal Code 12050: (b) A license may include any reasonable restrictions or conditions which the issuing authority deems warranted, including restrictions as to the time, place, manner, and circumstances under which the person may carry a pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person.
(c) Any restrictions imposed pursuant to subdivision (b) shall be indicated on any license issued.
I wonder if the permits that will be revoked, and the one that was revoked had idicated on their license that good caue may change and may initiate a revocation. If not, this constitutes a breach of contract by the sheriff, in my opinion.
The sheriff has the right and responsibility to define good cause. Hutchins however, hides behind the law with claims that there is nothing she can do about CCW's, that her new policy follows the law. Her claims are only partially true. The law does give her broad control over good cause, but it does not dictate good cause policy. Her good cause requirements are just that. Hers. If she was to say that her policy change was part of her personal agenda regarding CCW's in Orange County, I could respect and maybe even accept that. But, in my opion, she is pushing a personal agenda under the lie of following the law.
-
Barky 03/27/2009 7:50:00 PM
This sheriff is confused on what leadership entails. We need a real leader, not a ged secretary gone wild.
-
QP 03/27/2009 11:32:00 AM
Liar
-
Heather 03/27/2009 11:25:00 AM
the Sheriff of Orange County, Sandra Hutchens was sent to Command College while the President of the United States was in HER county. She must be so bad at her job, the only re-course was try and teach her something. One would think when the leader of the country is in town, the Sheriff would meet and greet. Not THIS appointed sheriff. She spent her birthday learning "how to be a sheriff" and so far she has failed miserably. Usually the first thing a Sheriff does is try and get re-elected, not THIS sheriff. She wants to turn orange county into South LA.
2010 is around the corner. Orange County needs a NEW sheriff. One that TRUSTS and communicates to the citizens. One who appreciatiates the reserves and volunteers. Sandi Sue has NOT shown up to one Reserves graduation this year. You would think all the money they are saving, helping the community, SHE would be there. NOPE.
This woman is out of her mind trying to be the sheriff. 2010 will be a new face!
-
SN 03/27/2009 11:22:00 AM
She's going to have a rude awakening. There's no way that woman will be elected.
-
William 03/27/2009 9:10:00 AM
I like the fact she has upset the power base that supported Carona, I will vote for her for that reason alone.
-
Stanley Fiala 03/27/2009 7:35:00 AM
It appears that Sandra could use some of these "Water Bra" as suggested by S.A. Councilman Carlos Bustamante.
Otherwise enjoy Sandra as a symbol of the true white socialist. That woman can be top cop for socialists Josef Stalin as well as Adolf Hitler.
I bet that she will be reelected by the same idiots who are screaming for the term limits.
-
Bob 03/27/2009 5:43:00 AM
I don't have a beef with the Sheriff. I think she is doing the right thing about re-evaluating the CCW permits. There was too much questionable activity with the permits so I think she should start over. Nobody who deserves one is losing out, the only thing happening to them is that they are a little inconvenienced now that they have to re-apply. But, if it restores integrity to the process it's worth it. I do have one thing bad to say though...Could she look any worse in uniform. My god, Jackie Gleason looked better in his bus driver uniform than she does. She really does a dis-service to that uniform. Yikes!
-
John 03/27/2009 4:02:00 AM
Norby is such a tool, what has the guy ever done for anyone except himself. What a crybaby, poor Norby did the deputies catch you doodling on your notepad. And Moorlach, could that dumbass be any more full of himself. Really Moorturd, she should have asked YOU for advice? I wouldn't ask you for a stick of gum. Moorlach and Norby don't equal an idiot between them. The sooner they're gone, the sooner this petty crap goes away. Don't they have bigger problems?