Top

film

Stories

 

Nothing Like a Bad Book Adaptation, Such as 'Inkheart,' to Turn Kids on to the Written Word

Reading Rainbow
Nothing like a bad book adaptation to turn kids on to the written word

Brendan “Kids’ Choice” Fraser returns to the multiplex daycare as “Mo” Folchart, antiquarian-book-repairman-cum-adventurer. In Inkheart’s opening chapter, he’s identified as a member of a race of “Silvertongues”—those who, when they read aloud, can suck people out of and into the texts they’re reciting from. Mo has abstained from practicing his gift ever since, when reading from some limited-press-run sub-Terry Brooks fantasy, the titular Inkheart, his wife was slurped off into limbo just as a motley assortment of the book’s rough-and-ready dramatis personae popped off the page.

Hmm . . . This must be the abridged version of the Necronomicon . . .
Hmm . . . This must be the abridged version of the Necronomicon . . .

Related Content

More About

Like this Story?

Sign up for the OC Weekly Screeners: Screening previews, news, reviews and features on everything from the silver screen.

Privacy Policy

All of this is retrospectively revealed a decade later to Mo’s daughter, now-adolescent Meggie (Eliza Bennett), when Inkheart’s villains catch up with Dad while he’s scouring obscure continental booksellers looking for a copy of The Book so he can reverse the switch. The Capo of the baddies, Capricorn (a clean-pated mortician’s waxen Andy Serkis, lending a squint of sardonic delectation), doesn’t want to go back into bindery and so orders copies of Inkheart put out of print by a private army of book-burning brigands. His henchmen are a crossbreed of Blackshirt thugs and a mid-’90s nu-metal band, operating from the castle whose dungeon holds a menagerie of literary beasties including Frank Baum flying monkeys, a J.M. Barrie ticking croc and a Bulfinch minotaur. (PBS’ Wishbone—with a Great Books reading list of Dickens, Poe and Stevenson—was comparatively AP English in its allusions.)

Inkheart’s source is the inaugural title in the lucrative Inkworld series by authoress Cornelia Funke—“Germany’s most successful children’s-book author of all time,” per the press kit. Strong international box office, for which the Anglo-American cast and built-in homeland fanbase seem well-designed, should line up the financing for a trilogy.

This opening petition for franchise is an upscale number, with resort-town Italian Riviera locales, top-shelf English actors (Paul Bettany, Helen Mirren, Jim Broadbent), and a nicely rendered, smoldering CGI end boss. The exteriors are passably picturesque but never indelible on the Maxfield-Parrish-doing-psychedelic-album-covers level of Tarsem’s The Fall.

Director Iain Softley, the man who honed himself to adapt Wings of the Dove by helming Hackers, is strictly a functionary; spreading the epidemic of fanbase-kowtowing “adaptation,” it seems as if every concession has been made to keep the book’s big cast of characters relatively intact. Condensing 535 pages from the English-language hardcover to a 103-minute runtime—certainly more daunting compressions have succeeded, but there’s a palpable feel of pinching here. Without the breathing room for characters to cultivate character, one-note shtick suffices, gamely appeasing the readership with walk-ons (“Hey, there’s Basta!”). A prickly apprenticeship between Bettany’s vagabond magician Dustfinger and Arabian Nights extra Farid (Rafi Gavron) never engages. It’s only thanks to reminders from the rest of the cast that one understands Mirren, as Meg’s Great Aunt, is “lovably eccentric.”

It all smacks of that overdone “passion for literature” common in off-putting English teachers who send any healthy-minded kid running from books at top speed. Mirren’s villa has a dream library that might grace a box of Celestial Seasonings tea, replete with an oh-so-cozy windowside nook. Bibliophile characters exclaim: “What in the name of Chaucer’s beard?” “For the love of Thomas Hardy!” and “Great galloping Knut Hamsuns!” (I made just one of those up.) Fraser intones, “The written word—it’s a powerful thing,” as though sitting for his “Reading Is FUNdamental” poster.

This is the sort of thing routinely let to pass because it “introduces young people to a love of reading” in a world perpetually panicked about the newest generation not learning how books work. (The introduction seemingly consists of convincing youths that sitting with a book is the sensory-assault equivalent of a Six Flags visit.) All of which is really just as likely to introduce young people to reading bilge. And anyway: Why being shut in with Boy Wizards or Tolkien’s drudging mythos should be inherently preferable to, say, working on a jump shot or watching SpongeBob SquarePants is quite beyond me—unless you happen to be in the Young Adult racket, that is.

Inkheart was directed by Iain Softley; written by David Lindsay Abaire, based on the novel by Cornelia Funke. Countywide.

 
  • Jasmina 02/08/2009 12:15:00 AM

    Thanks for posting an even handed review of the movie. The books are fabulous and have enchanted adult readers. The base plot this movie had to work with was stellar. It's a huge pity that the Hollywood exec's who made this looked at dollar signs versus creating a good movie. Firstly, I would not have misscast so badly. They should have actually picked actors even some without the Hollywood cachet to breathe the characters into life. It's ironic that a movie about a book that breathes life into characters fails at that from the first moment. Brenden Fraser is a twit, I would have cast Haggrith as the father figure, it needed to be someone who is a strong character. In comparison, I think the wild success of Twilight is that it featured non-Hollywood actors and wasn't that formulaic. Even the Harry Potter franchise movies looked like it had input from the author. Such a pity that the author Funke didn't seem to care about translating the books to the movie. Perhaps she was seduced by more dollars and royalty. As the book already had a cross-over adult/children audience the film is only targeted at children and lost the perfect opportunity to capture a broader built-in audience. I can only hope that an European version of this movie will be made by people who appreciate Funke's writing. Also to the author of this article, the other side of your "read-more" scenario for children is that I as a reader was told as a child to "go outside and play more" while my cousin was told "go inside and read".

  • Jeff 01/23/2009 7:31:00 AM

    The sad thing is that books...things with pages you can hold in your hand and read....are being overtaken by the internet. Civilization is going to lose... not the capacity to read... but the privilege of reading SLOWLY, digesting a book rather than wolfing it down on the web. Remember... you don't know what you'll miss 'till it's gone. (All of you folks schooled in CA public schools will not recognize that "it's" is the PROPER contraction for "it is" and is not a possessive. That is because you were educated in California.)

  • Jeff 01/23/2009 7:30:00 AM

    The sad thing is that books...things with pages you can hold in your hand and read....are being overtaken by the internet. Civilization is going to lose... not the capacity to read... but the privilege of reading SLOWLY, digesting a book rather than wolfing it down on the web. Remember... you don't know what you'll miss 'till it's gone. (All of you folks schooled in CA public schools will not recognize that "it's" is the PROPER contraction for "it is" and is not a possessive. That is because you were educated in California.)

  • Corrine 01/23/2009 5:11:00 AM

    Mr. Pinkerton: I read your article expecting a review about a movie. What I found was a mocking treatise on the state of reading amongst youths today. I was only vaguely irritated with the article�s abundance of quips and lack of real substance. Then, I came upon the last sentence where you slyly denigrate the importance of learning to read and those trying to impart a love of literature into our young. I truly hope this commentary was a poor attempt at satire and not your true point of view, since you are a writer. What relevance do you have in the world you paint? It�s interesting to note that your article is guilty of exactly what you criticize. By piling on your snide commentary about the book, the movie, and the Young Adult publishing industry, you never got down to the meat of the article � a review.

 

Find A Film

for free stuff, film info & more!

Most Popular Stories

Find A Coupon

Popular Coupons

Box Office

  1. The Vow, 0.0 mil, 0.0 mil
  2. Safe House, 40.2 mil, 40.2 mil
  3. Journey 2: The Mysterious Island 3D, 27.3 mil, 27.3 mil
  4. Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace 3D, 0.0 mil, 0.0 mil
  5. Chronicle (2012/ I), 12.1 mil, 40.0 mil
  6. The Woman in Black, 10.1 mil, 35.3 mil
  7. The Grey, 5.0 mil, 42.8 mil
  8. Big Miracle, 3.9 mil, 13.3 mil
  9. The Descendants, 3.4 mil, 70.7 mil
  10. Underworld: Awakening, 2.5 mil, 58.9 mil
Movie Title, Weekly Earnings, Total Earnings

Trailers

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy