Avery was busy working on Loose Change: Final Cut, which he hoped would be released in theaters worldwide. He didn't respond to interview requests for this story, but Marquis says Avery invited him and Ranke to combine their efforts. "I told him, no, we already had this planned," Marquis recalls. "He was trying to piggyback, but he said he'd pay for things. We went around filming, and he was mostly in the background while we did interviews. We figured, 'Great, he'll take this to the masses.'"

One of their first stops was Walter's Fairfax, Virginia, home. After noticing Ranke's not-so-subtle effort to secretly tape-record their conversation—and realizing that Ranke and Marquis weren't interested in hearing anything that contradicted their notion that a plane didn't actually hit the building—he refused to submit to an interview.

Aldo Marquis, Craig Ranke and the tools of their truth-sleuthing trade
John Gilhooley
Aldo Marquis, Craig Ranke and the tools of their truth-sleuthing trade
Aldo Marquis and Craig Ranke's map of the "real" vs. "official" story
John Gilhooley
Aldo Marquis and Craig Ranke's map of the "real" vs. "official" story

"They thought they were really going to uncover this thing, and I tried to set them straight," Walter says. "The next day, I told them I wasn't going to talk to them, and later, I found out they were really hammering on me on the Internet."

Walter's friend Troy Hanford, who was also at the barbecue, says that Pickering and Avery seemed like "opportunists" who were just trying to make it in Hollywood. "They wanted to be the next Michael Moore team," he said. "The other guys"—Marquis and Ranke—"their objective was to unseat the U.S. government."

Marquis and Ranke's next stop was a CITGO gas station across the street from the Pentagon, which they saw as a crucial place to search for eyewitnesses. The official flight path released by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) claimed that the American Airlines jet had passed on the south side of the gas station, where it struck down several light poles before hitting the building. But at least one eyewitness, a Pentagon police sergeant named William Lagasse, had said in an e-mail to a 9/11 researcher that he'd seen the plane on the north side of the gas station.

Where some might find contradictory eyewitness accounts a normal outcome of an intense, traumatic event, Marquis and Ranke view any eyewitness statement placing the plane on the north side of the gas station as clear evidence that the NTSB data is phony and further proof that the military was behind 9/11. They seized on Lagasse's e-mail as a smoking gun. Marquis and Ranke interviewed the manager of the gas station while Avery and Pickering filmed background shots of the Pentagon from a small hill next to the gas station. The manager claimed that one of her employees, Robert Turcios, had also seen the plane on the north side of the station. Marquis and Ranke couldn't believe their ears.

"We just looked at each other," Ranke recalls. "Huge bells went off."

Turcios wasn't at work that day. As Marquis, Ranke, Avery and Pickering prepared to leave, a police car pulled into the gas station. "One cop turns into two, turns into three, turns into a couple of suits," Marquis says. "They spent the next two hours interrogating us."

Police confiscated several rolls of film, citing the fact that the CITGO station was on U.S. Navy property. "They took our tapes but we knew they might, so we had already changed the tapes so they were blank," Ranke says.

After returning to California, Marquis says he started noticing strange clicks on the phone whenever he spoke with Pickering. He also noticed that Pickering didn't seem to share his enthusiasm for returning to Arlington to interview Turcios, the gas-station employee. "Russell got strange about it," Marquis says. "I almost got the feeling he was trying to deter me. . . . I think he was put there to be an operative."

Their relationship quickly soured. E-mails posted on conspiracy chat rooms show that what started as a professional disagreement about how to prove that the U.S. government was behind 9/11 had become a highly personal grudge match. Here's a typical e-mail from Ranke to Pickering:

"You are irrelevant, Pickering. . . . You can keep on sucking official story dick, and we'll keep proving 9/11 was an inside job."

And from Pickering to Ranke: "You are a mentally ill little man, and until you get some help, you always will be. A disgrace to truth . . . Fuck yourself. . . . Fuck you."

Pickering, who now runs an antiques store in Washington, recently told the Weekly he's aware Ranke and Marquis consider him to be a government operative. "They firmly believe that about me," he says, adding that his experience with Marquis and Ranke motivated him to drop out of the conspiracy movement. He still believes that 9/11 was an inside job, but Pickering strongly disagrees with Ranke and Marquis' fly-over theory, which isn't supported by a single eyewitness. "Nobody looked up and saw a plane fly over the Pentagon and fly away. Nobody reported a fly-over."

For his part, Pickering believes the plane crashed into the building. He thinks the American Airlines jet was somehow swapped for a remote-guided plane and—in one instance in which he does agree with Marquis and Ranke—that the crew and passengers were presumably executed. "If you tell people I think it was remotely guided, they'll think I'm as crazy as Aldo and Craig," he says. "But a reasonable look at the evidence is that the plane was not piloted by Hani Hanjour the way the government says it was."

*   *   *
<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next Page >>
 
  • Frank 12/15/2010 2:25:00 AM

    http://www.thepentacon.com/NickSchou.htm

  • Jay 08/17/2010 12:35:00 AM

    A friend of mine told me he thought 9/11 was an "inside job" two years ago and I almost kicked him out of my car. But once you look into it in any sort of depth, your attitude changes. You don't even have to look that far for Pete's sake. Consider the most obvious questions first: Why won't they just show us what hit the Pentagon? Why did WTC7 collapse? Why are there bright "flashes" before both planes hit the twin towers? Why do multiple witnesses describe the planes that hit the twin towers say they were "military planes" or "big gray plane(s)" or "not an American airline"? In fact, when you look at the four or five different images of Flight 175 approaching the second tower, why does it not appear to have a navy blue underbelly or blue tail like a United 767 is supposed to have? Why, why, why? I'll tell you why: The "Project for a New American Century" of which Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld were a part, wrote longingly of the need for a "New Pearl Harbor" to assert American primacy before they took power, and then they gave us one.

  • Jay 08/17/2010 12:26:00 AM

    These two guys, Ranke and Marquis, have brass balls to go to D.C. and canvass neighborhoods interviewing witnesses. They've made an important contribution. For you to insist that they not only prove gross inconsistencies in the official narrative but that they also tell you exactly how and whodunnit (without subpoena power) is condescending and snarky, even for a leftist weekly. Whose side are you on? If anybody should be doing it, the leftist weeklies should be canvassing those neighborhoods. I am a Registered Independent who tended to vote Republican in national elections until 2004 when I left the Presidential part of the ballot blank. I believed in "strong defense," "low taxes," and "limited government." Ha! What a laugh. The military industrial complex has run amok just like Eisenhower said it would, and things are perhaps much worse than that. The events of the last decade are appalling and give every indication of a series of genuine -- and NOT merely theoretical -- "conspiracies" to manipulate our markets, our housing, our food, our information, our foreign policy and to subvert all that was ever good or decent about this country. A revolutionary spirit is absolutely what is needed. The "at work forces" love partisan bickering between know-nothings. So keep snarking and let people like Renke and Marquis (and the rest of us) do the real work while O.C. Weekly kicks out "infotainment" for fun and profit. Seriously, you do some good work but the tone of this article really burns me considering what's at stake.

  • Frank 04/05/2010 12:18:00 AM

    Here's their response to this article http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWndd9q5Aac

  • Frank 04/05/2010 12:08:00 AM

    These two guys have done extraordinary job revealing the truth. Please visit their sites www.thepentacon.com, http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/index.html, http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?act=idx

  • People Investigating Toxic Sit 03/15/2010 11:39:00 PM

    The Pentagon was built on top of a former Arlington, Virginia garbage dump. Perhaps the explosion and fire were caused by gases generated in the landfill beneath and surrounding the Pentagon.

  • Alex Zelda 09/01/2009 1:41:00 AM

    so, then according to the author of this article the witnesses in the video are not telling the truth. lets have them take lie detector test...!?

  • Randy Lee 05/09/2009 9:27:00 PM

    I guess I am a little late for the show. What in the hell is this crap? The two guys from CIT are pathetic losers. WHO in their right mind would believe all the the evidence is planted...HAHA what a joke.

  • Passing Stranger 12/28/2008 10:52:00 PM

    What a pair of idiots...... They cherry pick *parts* of statements by less than 2% of witnesses to the Pentagon attack to suit their silly theory and then get upset when people don't accept this.... Even their own picked witnesses say the plane hit the Pentagon. And what's with the whole "CIT" bit? There's only the two of them.

  • Bob 12/22/2008 7:44:00 PM

    What bullshit. But what can you do but give the ppl what they want right?

  • James Dean 12/16/2008 5:15:00 AM

    I can't believe you tin foil nutters are still getting caught up in this. Nick pointed out how pathetic these two idiots are. All they are doing is looking for a few minutes of truther fame.

  • Mike 12/13/2008 5:48:00 PM

    The apparent repetitive use of the label: "conspiracy theorist" for researchers that have the tenacity, the wit and the guts you yourself will never have, reveals you for what you truly are: a biased and lazy excuse for a journalist with more interest for juicy gossip than fact finding coupled with an honest and balanced interpretation of information. Good luck with career, it means nothing.

  • John 08/28/2008 4:06:00 AM

    I personally don't believe in conspiracy theories, but obviously these guys went out to DC and collected taped interviews about what people saw that day. If the official flight path goes against what these eyewitnesses are saying, shouldn't we be questioning the official story rather than disparaging these two ordinary people? I don't care if they graduated from college or if their apartment is bare, if the evidence they show contradict the government's story, that's what we should be focusing on ALL PERSONAL BELIEFS ASIDE

  • Alex 08/28/2008 12:43:00 AM

    This "article" you present here has caused me to puke in disgust at your blatent contempt for respectable journalism. The lies and opinion you portray here are in complete conflict with the evidence these men provide, and your mockery of that shows that you have no place whatsoever in journalism. You should be fired.

  • Iggy Makarevich 08/24/2008 5:05:00 AM

    This is shoddy "journalism" at it's worst. This agenda-laden hit piece is so very full of lies and misrepresentations. I'd hoped to read a piece that helped expose this rich new avenue of evidence, but no, I'm treated to propagandist crap that bears little relationship to the site it's 'reporting' on. Reporter? This Schou is not a reporter. This twerp should be fired and OCWeekly should be ashamed.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy