By Peter Maguire
By Charles Lam
By Charles Lam
By Andrew Galvin
By R. Scott Moxley
By Gustavo Arellano
By R. Scott Moxley
By R. Scott Moxley
At an Oct. 9 meeting of the Orange County Rush Limbaugh Club, Assemblyman Todd Spitzer likely fired the first shot in the 2006 race for district attorney when he said there's a growing perception that incumbent Tony Rackauckas has "poisoned" trust in local law enforcement.
"The people of this county want and deserve a DA who is fair, just and above reproach," said Spitzer (R-Brea). "The average person in Orange County doesn't think the DA's office is fair anymore. We know that the DA has intervened on behalf of his friends, fouled up cases and there's been an ongoing issue of retaliation against deputies who haven't politically supported Tony Rackauckas."
The remarks at the Laguna Hills Holiday Inn weren't part of Spitzer's prepared speech on the upcoming elections, but came in response to an audience question about recent law enforcement scandals. Initially, the inquiry caught the freshman 71st Assembly District Republican off guard. "Boy," he said. "Is that question a plant by OC Weekly?" After a long pause, Spitzer said, "I guess I should be willing to say publicly what I've been saying privately."
Spitzer noted that in 2001 Rackauckas hampered a major fraud case against George Argyros, the billionaire Newport Beach real estate developer, Rackauckas contributor and now U.S. Ambassador to Spain. Spitzer said the California Attorney General's office was so suspicious of Rackauckas' conduct that they had one of the DA's own staff secretly record conversations. He also told the rapt audience that Rackauckas' handling of the infamous Haidl gang-rape case, which ended in a deadlock in June, was an embarrassment.
The DA's office issued a statement saying that Spitzer "does not know the facts" of the cases he cited and "is not in a position to judge what happened." But the assemblyman says it's Rackauckas who is clueless—especially in the Haidl case, which gained national attention.
"At first, he [Rackauckas] sought more than 50 years in prison for the defendants," said Spitzer, a former county supervisor, reserve cop, school board trustee and a deputy district attorney. "Now for the second trial, he says it's okay if the judge gives them probation? Where's his judgment? The public is confused. I'm perplexed."
Whatever happens in the Haidl case, Orange County is undoubtedly mired in a dizzying spat of law enforcement scandals. In addition to pending felony corruption charges against ex-Assistant Sheriff George Jaramillo, there are also separate allegations of jailhouse bribery, perjury, kickbacks, illegal campaign contributions, the selling of reserve sheriff badges, the thwarting of accurate public disclosure, indecent sexual activities and the use of government property such as a police helicopter for personal use. In March, the FBI raided Jaramillo's Santa Ana office. In September, the U.S. Attorney's office subpoenaed financial records for Sheriff Mike Carona's multi-million dollar children's charity.
Spitzer had almost no criticism of Carona except to note that one of the sheriff's top advisers is Mike Schroeder. The former chairman of the California Republican Party is a longtime Rackauckas friend as well as his campaign strategist. Schroeder's wife, Susan Kang Schroeder, is the DA's media director. According to the assemblyman, the arrangement casts doubt on whether Rackauckas can independently review allegations against Carona and his department. His remarks echoed concerns raised in an Oct. 3 Orange County Register column written by ex-local Common Cause president Bill Mitchell and Senior Deputy District Attorney Jane Shade.
"The lines have been blurred, and people don't know what to make of it," said Spitzer. "I'm not articulating some big conspiracy, and I'm not in a battle with [Rackauckas], but let all of that sink in for a minute."
Susan Kang Schroeder wasn't amused by Spitzer's comments. She called him a "political opportunist who attacks people when it's helpful to him."
"Mr. Spitzer is fully aware that the California Attorney General has ruled in writing that there is no conflict of interest [involving her and her husband's roles at the DA and Sheriff's offices]," said Schroeder. "And the AG has specifically said that Tony can fairly and thoroughly investigate matters relating the to the Sheriff's Department. You have to wonder why Spitzer deliberately misled his audience."
Asked by the Weekly if he planned to run against the DA, Spitzer, who twice previously endorsed Rackauckas for DA, refused to say. "I'm not going to answer that because right now the question really isn't about me," he said. "The question is: Does Tony Rackauckas deserve a third term?"
If Spitzer's calendar is any indication, he's already running—and not just against Bea Foster, a hopeless Democrat opponent in his November Assembly race. He's scheduled three town hall meetings and attended numerous events throughout Orange County. He's privately worked on building a campaign team. He's sought advice from powerful lobbyists. He's successfully planted a number of anti-Rackauckas stories in the press. His anti-crime legislation as well as his work on the growing West Nile Virus crisis in California have earned him favorable statewide media coverage. But critics, many of whom are members of his own political party, believe Spitzer is driven solely by personal ambition. They've described his style as "ready, fire, aim." Significantly, two of his campaign committees have more than $930,000 cash on hand.