By On the occasion of our 20th anniversary
By Gustavo Arellano
By R. Scott Moxley
By Alfonso Delgado
By Courtney Hamilton
By Joel Beers
By Peter Maguire
By Charles Lam
As President Bush was putting the finishing touches on his State of the Union address, the Pentagon top brass were talking about "A-Day," short for "Air Strikes Day."
On A-Day, the Air Force and Navy will launch 300 to 400 cruise missiles at targets in Iraq, CBS reported Saturday. That's more missiles than were launched during the entire 40-day Persian Gulf war of 1991.
Then, on A-Day plus one, they'll bombard Iraq with 400 more missiles. "There will not be a safe place in Baghdad," one Pentagon official told CBS. There are 4 million civilians in Baghdad, of whom 2 million are children.
The Pentagon likes A-Day because it supposedly concentrates on the psychological destruction of the enemy's will to fight, rather than on the physical destruction of his military forces. They won't admit it, but this is another horrible policy shift. This is what Hitler did to London during the Blitz in World War II. What Bush proposes is not collateral damage, but rather a level of civilian destruction not seen since the Second World War, with tens of thousands of intended civilian casualties.YOU TALKIN' TO ME?
On Meet the Press, Andrew Card, Bush's chief of staff, warned that Saddam Hussein "should anticipate that the United States will use whatever means necessary to protect us and the world from holocaust."
Does that include nuclear weapons? Tim Russert asked him.
"I'm not going to put anything on the table or off the table, but we have a responsibility to make sure Saddam Hussein and his generals do not use weapons of mass destruction," Card said. On Saturday, the Los Angeles Timesran an article based on Pentagon leaks that said Bush was drawing up targets for a nuclear attack. "What is clear, and the message that President Bush has sent unequivocally," White House communications chief Dan Bartlett told CNN, "is that if the Iraqi regime, if Saddam Hussein and his generals, decide for one second to use weapons of mass destruction against allied forces of the United States of America and our allies, we will make sure it doesn't happen."
Last December, Donald Rumsfeld signed a "classified nuclear posture review" allowing nuclear weapons to be used against countries including Iraq, Iran, Libya, Syria and North Korea.
Because weapons of mass destruction, as defined under U.S. laws, can run from a small container of anthrax to a nuclear bomb, Bush could rationalize pulling the nuclear trigger if American bombs were to unleash into the air any germ and biological warfare agents stored in underground Iraqi bunkers.
Some of the stuff sounds so outlandish it's hard to believe. But then you never know what Bush is thinking. And as he told Bob Woodward in Bush at War, the president sees no reason to explain his actions: "I'm the commander—see, I don't need to explain—I do not need to explain why I say things. That's the interesting thing about being the president. Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they say something, but I don't feel like I owe anybody an explanation."DIARY OF A MAD WHITE HOUSE
NATO has 19 members, with Turkey, Hungary and Poland among them. Most of the little countries in the shifting center of gravity either were part of the old Soviet Union or were satellites in its Eastern Bloc. They include such stalwart allies of the U.S. as Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, the Slovak Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan and the former Yugoslavia.
Some (the remnants of the former Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Ukraine) have supplied Saddam with weaponry. You're asking why? Because these small countries need revenue so they can buy advanced armaments to qualify for NATO membership.THANKS, MR. LINDSAY!