By Gustavo Arellano
By R. Scott Moxley
By Alfonso Delgado
By Courtney Hamilton
By Joel Beers
By Peter Maguire
By Charles Lam
By Charles Lam
Contact us via e-mail (firstname.lastname@example.org), regular mail (Letters to the Editor, OC Weekly, P.O. Box 10788, Costa Mesa, CA 92627) or fax (714-708-8410). Letters will be edited for clarity and length. By submission of a letter, you agree that we can publish and/or license the publication of it in print and electronically. All correspondence must include your home city and a daytime phone number.NO VIRGINS, POR FAVOR
I read with extreme disgust the piece Gustavo Arellano's "El Dia de Nuestro Señor Nativo" (Dec. 20). I found it offensive and distasteful but quite typical of the articles written by Arellano that have anything to do with me. For whatever reason, Arellano has repeatedly targeted me over the past year with critical pieces, ideological attacks, political irreverence and downright cynicism.
I'm as much for political irreverence as the next guy, but I inevitably look for the ideological underpinnings of such irreverence. Ultimately, all irreverence can be found to lean in one political direction or another. "Whose ox is gored?" is ultimately the question most readers with any political savvy seek to answer even if only intuitively. I am convinced that these are the readers of the OC Weekly.
Arellano's articles strike out not against those who sit in powerful economic or political positions, but against those who sit on the opposite side of that power. For example, Arellano has never raised his voice against those who have used their power to deny a driver's license to the estimated 2 million immigrants in California presently driving without such a document, but he unfairly targeted those who criticize such a backward public policy. Governor Gray Davis escaped unscathed from Arellano's venomous pen in that article.
He previously lashed out at big capital that agrees to a union contract for its workers in favor of little capital that opposes a union contract for its underpaid immigrant workers in his article on the Gigante Supermarket in the city of Anaheim and the broad alliance that forced the Anaheim City Council to concede a commercial permit to the Mexican-owned supermarket chain.
In the most recent article, he refrained from raising his pen against the powerful English-Only lobby represented by multimillionaire Ron Unz, author of Proposition 227, the English-Only ballot initiative approved in California in 1998. Unz seeks to unseat the four Latino school board members of the Santa Ana Unified School District. This is a district with 62,000 students, 92 percent Latino enrollment, and the fifth-largest school district in California. Not a word from Arellano about the wealthy few property owners in the north of 17th Street section of Santa Ana who vehemently oppose the building of a new elementary school in their neighborhood or their campaign to recall me from the school board for supporting this school-construction project. Arellano offers up only mockery, political disrespect, irreverence and distasteful cynicism toward those who confront the extreme right wing of the Orange County Republican Party in the current recall campaign in Santa Ana.
Cynicism is the pernicious ingredient that produces political apathy, the malaise that suits the political and social status quo adored by the power elite. Not even when dressed up by the pancake makeup of seeming political irreverence can cynicism be disguised for anything other than what it is. Herein lies the reactionary character of cynicism. It provides great comfort and support to those who have economic and political power and who use it to perpetuate the powerlessness of their victims.
On the balance sheet of the current political scene and power arrangements, it is not very hard to discern where Arellano directs his ire. He omits any critique of the existing power elite and their convenient economic interests, as such relates to the Latino communities of Orange County, and targets those who seek to change these power arrangements in the interest of the powerless. He seeks to pass it off as irreverence, void of any substantive critique, but he is only successful in displaying a disdainful cynicism and, thus, more fodder for the political apathy that mires our community in its own powerlessness. Thank you, Gustavo.Nativo Vigil Lopez Santa Ana Gustavo Arellano responds: The fact that you've devoted much of your life to fighting for immigrants and against right-wingers does not exempt you from criticism. Every one of my "irreverent" articles concerning you was inspired by your occasional—and perhaps merely human—boneheadedness. Sponsor radio ads calling Gray Davis a "fucking little white man"? Characterize the arrival in Anaheim of Gigante—a Mexico-based multinational conglomerate—as progressive? Use the Virgen de Guadalupe in a manner more self-serving than Bob Dornan could ever imagine? That's all you, chulo, not me. You describe my cynicism as "pernicious." Maybe so. But more pernicious is your expectation of complete fealty from me because I'm Latino and progressive. Finally, it takes a studied ignorance to claim my articles "omit any critique of the existing power elite" and "target those who seek to change these power arrangements." Because of your passion, intelligence and ambition—and your willingness to play the race card—you are part of the power elite.HE DIDN'T CRY, HE YAWNED!
I just finished reading Chris Ziegler's article on the Sharp Ease ("Rock & Roll Detox," Dec. 13). I was particularly intrigued by the part where the band claims they intimidated a man to tears in Santa Cruz. Currently living in Santa Cruz, I'm a member of the band that was supposed to play after the Sharp Ease set. But the cops showed up and shut everything down. We were all a little disappointed (and drunk), and our front man, Jeff, made an admittedly insensitive comment about "that lame-ass band" that just played. One of the Sharp Ease threatened to kick his ass and called him a fag. He called her homophobic. Then they went off to discuss their problems. They came back an hour later, and everything had cooled off; we staggered home and forgot about the night's ugliness.
Perhaps you can understand my shock upon reading that Jeff was "intimidated to tears" by the Sharp Ease. I don't believe there were any tears or intimidation happening that evening. I certainly cried myself to sleep that night at the thought of all the washboard solos I had been unable to share with the city of Santa Cruz, but certainly the Sharp Ease would have had no knowledge of that.Tom Child Santa CruzDEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
We incorrectly identified the author of our Dec. 20 film review of The Hours. It was actually Ella Taylor who said the film "sags badly in the middle," called Meryl Streep "distracted, lackluster," and said the novelist who wrote the book on which the film is based "can be maddeningly precious."