By On the occasion of our 20th anniversary
By Gustavo Arellano
By R. Scott Moxley
By Alfonso Delgado
By Courtney Hamilton
By Joel Beers
By Peter Maguire
By Charles Lam
Photo by Jack GouldOn Oct. 8, Jo Ellen Allen came to visit.
Four days earlier, "God Bless America," my exposé on Allen and her husband, Eddie, had appeared on the cover of the Weekly. That story documented Eddie's masterful use of patriotism and religion to (in the words of the judge overseeing Eddie's bankruptcy trial, which had just ended) misrepresent himself and defraud his investors of millions of dollars. Eddie fraudulently portrayed himself as a Harvard-trained lawyer and financial genius who managed billions of dollars of assets on Wall Street, narrowly missed making the Forbes magazine list of wealthiest Americans, and was a decorated CIA spy who was captured and tortured in Southeast Asia.
My article also cited court documents and testimony that Jo Ellen, a high-profile Republican Party official and Southern California Edison public-relations official, sometimes assisted her husband in cultivating his clients.
I tried countless times without success to get the Allens to speak to me before the story went to press. Eddie left several messages, finally indicating that he could not talk with me in the absence of his attorney, Donald Segretti—and Segretti, he explained, was out of town. But Jo Ellen failed to respond to any of my many phone and e-mail messages requesting her side of the story.
On Oct. 8, we finally got Jo Ellen's side when she hand-delivered to the Weekly's editor a 1,900-word response to "God Bless America." Like the tales Eddie told prospective investors—stories that emerged in his more than two-year bankruptcy case—Jo Ellen's response is shot throughout with high-sounding morality and politics. Nor is it surprising that Jo Ellen would portray herself as a victim who "hurts deeply" because of my article. I would ask Jo Ellen to consider the real victims here: Eddie's many creditors who, collectively, have lost millions of dollars entrusted to him. Eight of them say Jo Ellen accompanied Eddie during his sales pitches to them, vouching for his tales of military heroism, bolstering their sense that he had powerful political connections. They include Mrs. Lee Picket of Washington—now nearly blind, her aging husband near death, her house foreclosed, her life savings lured away by the Allens' tales of patriotism and faith. Jo Ellen Allen has no shame.
I had intended in this issue to document Eddie's wild, contradictory stories of his career as a top-secret spy for the U.S. government, but that story will have to wait so I can respond to the charges Jo Ellen levels in her letter.
1) The article "God Bless America!" was an "effort to malign yet another conservative Republican." In fact, the article relies almost exclusively on the findings of a federal judge in a case in which the Allens' critics identify themselves as conservative Republicans. Rather than a figment of left-wing imagination, the story is built on a bedrock of evidence from a federal trial.
2) "I am not, and never have been, in any way involved in my husband's business." This assertion is the basis of Jo Ellen's letter, but it's contradicted by her own words (as you've no doubt already seen) and flies in the face of the testimony of eight creditors—all conservative Republicans—who said Jo Ellen helped Eddie in his sales pitch to investors. Sworn testimony at Eddie's bankruptcy trial by investor Pickett, to cite just one example, noted that Jo Ellen actively assisted Eddie in his sales pitch.
3) Is Eddie a colonel? Did Eddie fight in Southeast Asia? Was he a POW? A CIA agent? All of these questions will be answered in my forthcoming story. For the moment, let's recall the unequivocal words of federal Judge Robert W. Albert, the Republican who presided at Eddie's trial last month. At the close of trial, the judge described Allen's story of military heroics as "internally inconsistent" and "thoroughly discredited."
4) In documenting links between Jo Ellen's political organizations and Eddie's financial firms, the Weekly "deliberately created a completely false impression of impropriety and possibly illegal behavior." I never alleged or even implied that the many well-documented financial ties between the organizations were illegal. Improper? Only if one of the results of those relationships was that investors felt more confident of Eddie's sales pitch. My point was that contrary to Jo Ellen's assertions in this letter, the organizations were, indeed, linked in several ways, including—but not limited to—shared office space and finances. Creditors allege that Eddie used tens of thousands of dollars of their money to help fund Jo Ellen's unsuccessful 1992 Assembly campaign.
5) "If the Weekly has a document which indicates an August 8 [birth] date, I would certainly like to see it." Please see the photograph at right.
6) "Moxley's facts [about the National Council of Business Advisors] are totally inaccurate." Evidence collected during the trial suggests the council was a shell organization designed merely to enhance the Allens' résumés. The council had no office, equipment or employees of its own, operating instead (according to the group's letterhead) from the Allens' Newport Beach business address. What did the group do? The only evidence Eddie has offered is two brief, impersonal form letters, one each from the Reagan and Bush White Houses, thanking Eddie for his comments on the economy. I have asked Jo Ellen for a list of the council's accomplishments; she has produced nothing. I have been able to find just two mentions of the organization on my own: Eddie lists it in his 1989, 1990 and 1991 Who's Who in Business and Finance entries, and when she joined Southern California Edison in 1995, Jo Ellen listed among her accomplishments her role as a consultant to the "prestigious" group.