Most Popular
Recent Blog Posts
SLIDESHOWSNational Features >
print | email | write comment
RAID killed deadAnother one bites the dustREBECCA SCHOENKOPFPublished on June 28, 2001
In the meantime, Presneill was moving from the British Isles to Laguna Beach, where his gallery of British artists cluttered up every available inch of wall space. Soon, he'd ditched the British Lime Gallery and moved to Santa Ana, where he got a small but bitchen apartment in Cal State Fullerton grad-student housing and began very quickly to insinuate himself into the loosely woven fabric of the Artists Village. Just as quickly—due mainly to the excellent one-night art parties that took over entire buildings that he organized with Cal State Fullerton art honcho Mike McGee—Presneill was synonymous with the Artists Village. Giardina and Presneill can usually be found on the Gypsy Den Grand Central's patio, shooting people looks and thinking very well of themselves and their slice of the art world. And now, with what feels like an awful conspiracy to drive me mad, RAID Projects joins a long list of OC mainstays to announce it's shutting its doors this summer. Giardina says the Empire Building's landlord has doubled RAID's rent, so it's time to head for LA, to a 6,000-square-foot space at the Brewery. They take possession of the space Aug. 1, but the Santa Ana gallery will remain open until then. This means, of course, no more cans of Pabst Blue Ribbon at the monthly Artists Village openings. No more sneering. No more aesthetically impaired works for which one has to read an incomprehensible manifesto to glean—sort of—meaning from the meaninglessness. No more respite from the earnest student works and pleas for commissions to copy masterworks for a small fee across the street. And the Artists Village will be a much duller place. RAID's current project, "Uniform Building Codes," is typical Presneill and Giardina. It's not much to look at, and the theory talks itself into pretty circles that even the curators don't understand. And yet, when you're most ready to scoff, something outstanding pops forth. Matt Fisher's blue and yellow trapezoid cutouts on the walls of the gallery's backroom are excruciating. His artist's statement is equally impenetrable, discussing Western history as a list of permutations of models and variegated attempts to analyze, qualify and anticipate reality as we experience it, using modernist abstraction to make systems of notation that transcribe interconnected matrices of information into paintings. To be fair, that wasn't originally one sentence. But still. I mean, come on. According to Giardina, the lightly penciled sheets of paper with mathematic notations on them represent people and perhaps—perhaps—genealogy. Fisher then uses computer models to come up with corresponding shapes. "I don't understand it," Giardina said, shrugging. "I'm not a physicist. But you know, he's a Claremont guy." Indeed. The fact that there is no bridge of understanding for the viewer doesn't bother Fisher at all: he says so in his artist's statement. I think. It's in the front room, with Arthur Aghajanian's projects, that things get unexpectedly lovely. He has his share of B.S. for his Otis professors—he talks of seeking to move into and interrogate coded systems of belief, knowledge and power. Who teaches these kids to write their damn artist's statements, anyway? But as a writer, I can only admire his excellent choice of action verbs, despite their overreaching. Aghajanian's works are divided into two projects. One features paired sheets of paper on which couples have individually drawn their homes' floor plans from memory. Not only do people apparently not know where their own bedrooms are, but almost every couple had one anal guy drawing in each stool and end table, and one slob who barely conveyed walls and trees. Without a lot of hemming and hawing and overblown language, Aghajanian lets the dysfunction of the pictures speak. I will, too.
write your comment
|