By Matt Coker
By R. Scott Moxley
By Charles Lam
By Nick Schou
By Gustavo Arellano
By Gustavo Arellano
By Steve Lowery
By R. Scott Moxley
A coffeehouse journal is something like Wim Wenders' 1988 movie Wings of Desire (three and a half stars, says Leonard Maltin) in which Eurotrash angels with fashionable haircuts and Gucci overcoats hang around Berlin statuary, eavesdropping, spying and mind reading. They're desperate, these angels, eager to feel vicariously the quickening of their hearts, the first flush of panic, that sinking feeling you and I get when we find ourselves in the Slough of Despond. They want to feel something, anything because, though they're immortal, they're also heartless, cold, immovable. They're natural-born stoics. One of the angels expresses the general angelic opinion when he says he is tired of hovering: "I want to feel a weight within me."
The angels envy us! And Wenders wants to know: Would you trade your up-and-down mortal life for an affect-free Prozac life that never ends? Hell, no, says Peter Falk, as an angel who trades everlasting life among the dull celestial host for a gig as American television star Peter Falk.
A coffeehouse journal is like that. Consider the Costa Mesa Gypsy Den's Year 2000 journal, a food- and drink-spattered diary of graffiti, doodling, art, despair, philosophy, pop psychology, Hallmark-card sentiments, poetry and love notes. Reading it, you learn what you might if you could download random e-mails, bug cell phones, or (provided you speak German) stalk Berlin, leaning over the shoulders of people who can't see you.
The journal wasn't supposed to be a journal. In early May, when the book was new, someone from the Gypsy Den wrote "Names & Addresses, Please" on the inside front cover and left it on a coffee table. Seven people wrote their names and addresses (including Eric Damboise of Old Town, Maine), before the eighth decided the address book ought to be a journal.
"Dear Die-ary," "Alejandro" writes in rococo swirls. "Hey, I'm bored," he begins, before telling us that he ditched school that morning, came to the Den, bought coffee and spilled it. And now we're bored, too—see how coffeehouse journals can bring us together?
But then Alejandro has a Wings of Desire moment. "You know, I feel really bad about the girl, the li'l tiny girl that got run-eded over by that train yesterday morning . . . a life taken away just like that as if she was nothing God loved," he writes.
The girl was probably Elizabeth Tepox, a 12-year-old Santa Ana kid who died May 24 when a 450-ton Metrolink train hit her while doing around 75 mph. According to Times reporters, about 200 people showed up at the accident scene, including the girl's father. He cried when he told the reporter his daughter "wanted a horse. She was saving the money we gave her to buy a horse."
What really bothers Alejandro is how much his life is like Elizabeth's. "I don't enjoy that feeling of being stepped on, being used, being nothing," he writes. "It's all over, just like the little girl."
What's all over? His life? His meditation on death and God? What does Alejandro understand about that fraction of a fraction of a second when you know you haven't made it across the train tracks? He doesn't say. He wraps up his entry with an apology if he has bored "Mrs. Gypsy Den"—as if she's a spirit, a muse, a lesser god.
Several entries treat the coffeehouse as if it really is governed by a Romany seer. They appeal to "the gypsy" in entries that begin like the Our Father. "Dear Gypsy," Veronica writes on May 26. "This is my first . . . time here. The first time that I seat [sic] down to enjoy it." But Veronica's companion "is not so lucky. He is in very much pain, so Gypsy, if you have any magic, I ask you to work on him tonight. I make this wish tonight for my dear friend to heal his heart and move on in life." The prose style suggests she's English-as-a-second-language, but her prayer—that the gypsy will help this guy "leave the past"—is strictly New Age American. She wishes the gypsy would let her friend see "the beautiful things in life that are right beside him," and you can't help wondering if one of those things is Veronica herself.
Most of the love letters are written directly to someone who's pretty clearly someplace else. "Tracy Anne" loves "Dave" "very much because you take care of me, you listen to me, because you're intelligent and loving because you love my Daughter I know the years are difficult but as long as we stand together I know we can work things out" and on and on, her handwriting sprawling larger across the page, no hesitating punctuation, just a breathless rush to the inevitable greeting-card conclusion: "I am looking forward to the rest of my life with you, love always."
In the margin, someone has written, "LOSER."
Tracy Anne's letter and the anonymous response establish the two poles of journal discourse—of self-disclosure and shut the hell up. Most of these entries are odd like that, open letters of love or remorse with no obvious expectation of a response and certainly no expectation of the occasional, mean-spirited putdown they receive. (When "Auntie" writes "Darling Girl" that "God will give you all the desires of your heart," some wise guy with a pencil scratches a pentagram over her note and, in case we mistake his jackhammer-subtle meaning, includes three backward 6s and the postscript: "HE will give you what you want.")