You really missed something special.

Your colleague in criticism,

Joel Beers
Theater critic
OC Weekly
two desks over
Buddy Seigal responds:Dear Joel: Nice to hear from you. I don't know who you're fucking these days, but she must be pretty lame in the sack. Respectfully, Buddy.


I would like to thank Nick Schou for reporting on Liberate Orange County's action for Fair Trade Certified coffee at Diedrich Coffee ("Working for Beans," May 26). However, there were some factual errors I would like to correct.

First, Liberate Orange County is not a Green Party splinter group, although some members of Liberate Orange County are Greens and some Greens took place in the Diedrich action.

Also, Diedrich has not yet agreed to carry Fair Trade Certified coffee. Our goal was to get Diedrich to take action to carry it. A few days before our planned protest, we heard that the Specialty Coffee Association of America, of which Diedrich is a member, decided to form a task force to promote and encourage its members to purchase Fair Trade Certified coffee and that Diedrich has been in dialogue with the task force and TransFairUSA, the organization that certifies Fair Trade coffee. It was therefore decided to wait and see the result of Diedrich's dialogue. Instead of having signs and chants, we educated customers about Fair Trade Certified coffee and encouraged them to ask Diedrich to carry it. In the two hours we were there, eight people helped hand out about 50 fliers to people who would have otherwise not known about Fair Trade coffee. If Diedrich doesn't agree to carry coffee that is Fair Trade Certified, we will be back with signs and chants.

Anyone who would like to learn more about Fair Trade Certified coffee or Liberate Orange County can contact us at

Mira Ingram
Liberate Orange County
Fountain Valley
Nick Schou responds: Let's chalk up the errors to a misunderstanding, then. Mira Ingram is the person who told me (at the Diedrich rally) that Diedrich Coffee had already agreed to negotiate coffee purchases with TransFair. Also, when I walked up to the demonstrators, I asked, "You folks with the Green Party?" They said yes.


I just read Victor D. Infante's article on the Santa Ana Shelter and was dismayed to say the least ("Santa Ana's Dirty Little Secret," May 19). I have been visiting the shelter for the past several weeks and found the staff to be caring and concerned. Of course there will be odors; after all, there are animals confined there. I have yet to slip in urine or feces, or even see any on the floors. The floor is often wet in spots, but that is due to the attendant constantly cleaning and hosing out the cages. He moves animals from one cage to another while doing so. Overcrowded? I have yet to see more than one dog to a cage unless they were small puppies and then only three. He [shelter owner Larry Day] is always hoping to see a dog adopted. Injured animals? Had your "reporter" taken the time to read the paperwork on the cages, he might have seen that some of those dogs had just come in. Maybe from being recently hit by a car or abandoned by their owner. I personally have seen several injured animals there as well; the paperwork on the cages were medical notes from a veterinarian noting condition and treatment.

I also question the professionalism and integrity of a "reporter" who uses the term "covered in shit"—poor command of the English language at best. My guess is he's a former National Enquirerreporter. He's great at painting a picture. It's just the wrong one.

Keith Underwood
Victor D. Infante responds: We got 11 letters thanking us for the article and two—Keith Underwood's and another from his same e-mail account—taking us to task for exposing awful conditions in Santa Ana's animal-control program. Underwood's gives me a chance to correct two errors in the article. First, it's the city animal control, not the county, that rarely orders veterinary care. Second—as Underwood correctly points out—the floors are not covered in urine and feces; they are extremely slippery because the cages are hosed. I regret the errors.

I plead guilty to believing it's a responsibility of civil society to protect animals, rather than to herd them through these subterranean hells for a quick dispatch. Otherwise, there's not one instance described in the article that I didn't both see with my own eyes and confirm with other people; in several cases, we have photographs of the actual animals.

Perhaps Underwood has been lucky enough to hit the shelter on good days, or perhaps—unlikely as it seems—I and the several other people I've spoken to have all repeatedly hit it on bad ones. Sorry that's not a nice story.

P.S. Drop the motherly harangue about other people's English usage; you'll go far in life.


Maybe it's because I'm on the East Coast and no longer live in Southern California so my morals have changed, but I find it repulsive to find such language, normally reserved for behind-the-counter publications, in print within an over-the-counter news publication. To make matters worse, it is on the Web. I have a search engine set up to search news articles which contain the phrase "Titanic" as I am somewhat of a Titanic buff and like to read about new details regarding the subject. I am used to getting news articles related to James Cameron and other forms of entertainment-industry-related projects that involve the subject, but I can't say I have ever seen one that used the word "fuck." Until now. It is sad that news publications have been reduced to mind-numbing alley-cat trash talk.

Al Costa
via e-mail
« Previous Page